Fran, I agree with your suggestion, I'll do it this way.
Flammie, the only change you need to do in the bidix is to add an entry
like this:
's
This will allow your pair to get a lemma after the word in genitive
that can be used in transfer rules when translating from English. The other
way
2017-07-18, Francis Tyers sanoi:
> El 2017-07-18 14:44, Marc Riera Irigoyen escribió:
> > Hello! I'm working on apertium-eng-cat and I've been having some
> > issues with genitives. Currently, many noun paradigms in
> > apertium-eng (mostly irregular nouns) have a form with the
> > genitive. Not
El 2017-07-18 19:04, Marc Riera Irigoyen escribió:
I hadn't considered the other uses, but I've come up with a better
solution that takes them into consideration and shouldn't break pairs
relying on apertium-eng.
Basically, the genitive form would be added as generation-only for
paradigms with
I hadn't considered the other uses, but I've come up with a better solution
that takes them into consideration and shouldn't break pairs relying on
apertium-eng.
Basically, the genitive form would be added as generation-only for
paradigms with a regular ('s) genitive. The would allow apertium to
Hello! I'm working on apertium-eng-cat and I've been having some issues
with genitives. Currently, many noun paradigms in apertium-eng (mostly
irregular nouns) have a form with the genitive. Not all nouns have
it, so apertium-eng also includes a specific lemma for the regular genitive
('s) to add
