Re: [Apertium-stuff] Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial) going EOL

2021-05-10 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Kevin Brubeck Unhammer čálii: > it's probably the impossiblest to compile the same way, just put it into that line was missing a "not" there :-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Apertium-stuff mailing list

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial) going EOL

2021-05-10 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
"Bernard Chardonneau" čálii: > a solution could be to give both source code of Apertium tools > ans source code of system libraries it uses. These libraries would be > compiled with Apertium tools using them and object files stored outside > /usr/lib . So, there would not be compatibility

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial) going EOL

2021-05-10 Thread Tino Didriksen
I think Apertium's support model is a very good balance of bleeding edge and long term support, but as the packager I am also the one who basically decided it so I'll admit I am biased. Still, I think it's objectively good, and I'll try to argue my point. First of all, security. Distros and