Yes, most of our tools assume that tags are position independent, but
I've come across a handful of languages that treat some tags as
position dependent, and I was more hoping to make it official to make
it less likely that we run into issues with that.
Also, I have an idea for how to make a versi
Daniel Swanson
čálii:
> To be clear, I meant splitting into .
👍
> One of my ideals for the tagset is that every tag be
> position-independent, so that the only reason I need to care about
> order is because of FST topology (and maybe not even then).
Aren't the tags themselves already positio
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 6:07 AM Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
>
> Daniel Swanson
> čálii:
>
> > Greetings Apertiumers!
> >
> > This morning I set out to change the Ancient Hebrew analyzer from
> > Latin script to Hebrew script (a task I don't wish upon anyone) and in
> > the process produced a sea
Daniel Swanson
čálii:
> Greetings Apertiumers!
>
> This morning I set out to change the Ancient Hebrew analyzer from
> Latin script to Hebrew script (a task I don't wish upon anyone) and in
> the process produced a search-and-replace tool that understands the
> structure of several of our source
Am Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 03:35:45PM -0500 schrieb Daniel Swanson:
> This script could, without too much trouble, be expanded to cover the
> rest of our source files, at which point I would like to propose that
> we move towards greater standardization of our tagset:
> https://wiki.apertium.org/wiki
