Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-12 Thread Flammie A Pirinen
I think I've come up with a solution that is minimally intrusive for existing work-flows and usages, and that is, allowing optionalising select tags for generation, i.e.: Analysing: echo London | lt-proc eng.automorf.bin ^London/London/London$ (I didn't even plan this it just happened to be

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-06 Thread Flammie A Pirinen
Thank you all for a lively discussion, I'll summarise here and reply to few of the comments in a typical inline reply format. I think as tldr we agree to some extent that these rich np annotation tags are specific to language pairs and steps in the pipeline and should not be hindering unrelated

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-03 Thread Bernard Chardonneau
Answer below. > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:10:42 +0300 > From: Hèctor Alòs i Font > To: "[apertium-stuff]" > Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful > Pièce(s) jointes(s) probable(s)&

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-03 Thread Hèctor Alòs i Font
Missatge de Xavi Ivars del dia dc., 3 de febr. 2021 a les 1:10: > Hèctor, please correct me if I am wrong. > > In Catalan, for example, we have gender annotated for proper nouns, > because as Hèctor explained, it's useful in the some cases when translating > to French. So Catalan monolingual

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-03 Thread Hèctor Alòs i Font
Missatge de Kevin Brubeck Unhammer del dia dc., 3 de febr. 2021 a les 0:40: > Hèctor Alòs i Font > čálii: > > > I am more sceptical about the need to distinguish between toponyms and > > hydronyms. In some languages one will have an article and the other will > > not, but these are rare cases.

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-02 Thread Xavi Ivars
Hèctor, please correct me if I am wrong. In Catalan, for example, we have gender annotated for proper nouns, because as Hèctor explained, it's useful in the some cases when translating to French. So Catalan monolingual generates rich tags for np. However, when translating to Spanish, that

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-02 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Hèctor Alòs i Font čálii: > I am more sceptical about the need to distinguish between toponyms and > hydronyms. In some languages one will have an article and the other will > not, but these are rare cases. On the other hand, we do not distinguish > between countries (or regions) and cities,

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-02 Thread Hèctor Alòs i Font
Missatge de Kevin Brubeck Unhammer del dia dt., 2 de febr. 2021 a les 13:35: > Flammie A Pirinen čálii: > > > Hi all, > > > > I've written a handful of apertium-fin-* prototypes and I usually end up > > spending way too much time with all the useless subclasses of proper > > nouns we have

Re: [Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-02 Thread Kevin Brubeck Unhammer
Flammie A Pirinen čálii: > Hi all, > > I've written a handful of apertium-fin-* prototypes and I usually end up > spending way too much time with all the useless subclasses of proper > nouns we have (cogs, ants, als, tops, orgs, and to top all that, > sometimes ms and fs for some extra

[Apertium-stuff] Proper noun classification considered harmful

2021-02-01 Thread Flammie A Pirinen
Hi all, I've written a handful of apertium-fin-* prototypes and I usually end up spending way too much time with all the useless subclasses of proper nouns we have (cogs, ants, als, tops, orgs, and to top all that, sometimes ms and fs for some extra (mis)gendering). Could we just get rid of those