Just GREAT to hear that our work on the Java port will be used!
I'll gladly help with whatever problems there might be.
Excluding maven as I've never used mvn :-)
We never had time to do a user friendly install package, but it would
certainly easen the casual (windows) users installation burden
Just a couple of comments.
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Jimmy O'Regan jore...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 February 2012 00:05, Bernard Chardonneau bechapert...@free.fr wrote:
lttoolbox-java works fine with all the existing dictionaries, and should
be feature-complete with the C++ version.
Hello,
I've been searching around for a good morphological analyzer for a while
and came across Lttoolbox. The analyzer step does exactly what I want
for words in a language, it splits the word into it's lexical base and
then adds in morphological tags based on how the word was formed.Up
stevens35 steven...@llnl.gov writes:
Hello,
I've been searching around for a good morphological analyzer for a while
and came across Lttoolbox. The analyzer step does exactly what I want
for words in a language, it splits the word into it's lexical base and
then adds in morphological
Hi All,
Thanks for the quick and really awesome responses. The java version of
Lttoolbox is /*exactly*/ what I was hoping to find (and not have to
write myself)! Looking through the source code for the processing main,
it doesn't look too hard to use the internal classes as a library and
El dc 08 de 02 de 2012 a les 10:21 -0800, en/na stevens35 va escriure:
Hi All,
Thanks for the quick and really awesome responses. The java version of
Lttoolbox is /*exactly*/ what I was hoping to find (and not have to
write myself)! Looking through the source code for the processing
Just wanted to pipe up on this topic. I completed the Java port as a
GSoC project back in 2010, and yes the design of the modules is to
just pass around large strings/buffers. This makes it easier to use as
a library, yes. Though a bit of a heads-up, I believe there may still
be some places where
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:07:05 +0100
From: Kevin Brubeck Unhammer unham...@fsfe.org
To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
Reply-To: apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Apertium-stuff] Using Lttoolbox from within
