On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 06:33:12PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> (Also, I'm very much unconvinced that "building this binary artifact
> from source in a reproducible manner is too hard, let's ship it in the
It's not that it's too hard -- after all, it worked before, and we took it
out :) -- it's that
Tyler Hicks:
> On 01/20/2017 09:46 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> Tyler Hicks:
>>> In Ubuntu, I was planning on using the pre-generated pdf.
>>
>> Then I guess we should simply agree to disagree about this aspect of
>> Free Software :)
> I don't even know if I disagree with you on this topic. I just don
On 01/20/2017 09:46 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Tyler Hicks:
>> On 01/20/2017 02:15 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>>> note that as far the Debian packaging is concerned, I'll keep building
>>> that file from source: that's the only way to guarantee that we
>>> distribute the source "code" corresponding to the bi
Tyler Hicks:
> On 01/20/2017 02:15 AM, intrigeri wrote:
>> note that as far the Debian packaging is concerned, I'll keep building
>> that file from source: that's the only way to guarantee that we
>> distribute the source "code" corresponding to the binary artifacts
>> included in our binary packag
On 01/20/2017 02:15 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> note that as far the Debian packaging is concerned, I'll keep building
> that file from source: that's the only way to guarantee that we
> distribute the source "code" corresponding to the binary artifacts
> included in our binary packages. This d
On 01/20/2017 06:31 AM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 at 04:14:53 +, Tyler Hicks wrote:
>> -rm -rf techdoc.aux techdoc.out techdoc.log techdoc.pdf techdoc.toc
>> techdoc.txt techdoc/
>
> If my (admittedly very rusty) memory of LaTeX is correct, shouldn't
> you still be delet
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 at 04:14:53 +, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> - rm -rf techdoc.aux techdoc.out techdoc.log techdoc.pdf techdoc.toc
> techdoc.txt techdoc/
If my (admittedly very rusty) memory of LaTeX is correct, shouldn't
you still be deleting the .log, .out, etc., and only keeping
the final pr
Hi,
note that as far the Debian packaging is concerned, I'll keep building
that file from source: that's the only way to guarantee that we
distribute the source "code" corresponding to the binary artifacts
included in our binary packages. This doesn't conflict with the
proposed patch though, I'll
