Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATES] Status ?

2006-10-30 Thread Joe Schaefer
Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: [...] Sadly, I don't think this can go into the 2.x series because of our conversioning rules. New features need new symbols. SVN gets around this by doing: void foo (void) void foo2 (int) Can you elaborate? I didn't

Re: Problems with apreq2 on OS X

2006-10-30 Thread Patrick Galbraith
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: this one time in band camp Patrick Galbraith said on 10/29/06 16:26: Dave, Speaking of which - how do you use gdb with mod_perl/libapreq? I'm used to using it and other debuggers (Visual Studio, etc, DDD with gdb, Xcode) with mysqld and DBD::mysql, but how do you

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATES] Status ?

2006-10-30 Thread Joe Schaefer
Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: That's what I originally thought when told to do it this way, but its wrong. RFC 3875 section 4.1.7 says The server MUST set this variable; if the Script-URI does not include a query component, the QUERY_STRING MUST be defined as an empty

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATES] Status ?

2006-10-30 Thread Joe Schaefer
Joe Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why not just use GATEWAY_INTERFACE? That way we don't need to argue about the actual adoption of RFC 3875 (not a standard) vs the original (ambiguous) CGI spec. Actually I took a peek around, and I think both IIS and Tomcat support 3875. So as long as

Win32 ppm packages

2006-10-30 Thread Randy Kobes
I'd like to get a sense from Win32 ppm users of mod_perl and/or libapreq2 about the following. Right now in our http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ ppm repository, there's ppm packages for mod_perl and libapreq2. The ones compatible with Apache/2.0 are called mod_perl and libapreq2,