Re: [aqm] Alia Atlas' Yes on draft-ietf-aqm-codel-07: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alia, nearly forgot that I quickly want to come back to you on this one. Actually there is no one good recommendation to make. This is why the working ended up standardizing multiple schemes. However, the general guidance given in RFC 7567 is to deploy at least one of the solution. And

[aqm] Recharter discussion in Berlin

Hi wg, as we had a short recharter discussion in Berlin, I would like to take the opportunity to summary my view on the wg. I was very happy to see a quite lively discussion in Berlin. From my memory and also by looking at the minutes, I would draw the following conclusions from this

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

Hi Dave, hi all, > Am 02.06.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Dave Täht : > > My own desire is to see more link layers - wifi, 5g, 6lowpan, homeplug, > especially, explored with more implementations. There is also new stuff > like threads, wifi direct/p2p, and this new ieee effort, >

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

ED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com>: > > more below, thanks for the clarifications, Mirja! > Al > >> -----Original Message- >> From: Mirja Kühlewind [mailto:mirja.kuehlew...@tik.ee.ethz.ch] >> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 12:55 PM >> To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL);

Re: [aqm] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benoit, I would not expect to see a bis doc here. As I said I would rather expect a new, separate document to specify and register the metrics (and providing more details). Given the very different scope and use case, I would not even see it as a problem if those two documents don't align

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-04.txt

Hi Wes, the concern I have is that, even if no normative language is used (which is correct), people might still take this as a IETF recommendation and therefore I think we should review it carefully. However, as no normative language is used, people might not review this document

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-04.txt

/ ___ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm -- -- Dipl.-Ing. Mirja Kühlewind Communication Systems Group Institute TIK, ETH Zürich Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zürich

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-04.txt

.-Ing. Mirja Kühlewind Communication Systems Group Institute TIK, ETH Zürich Gloriastrasse 35, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland Room ETZ G93 phone: +41 44 63 26932 email: mirja.kuehlew...@tik.ee.ethz.ch -- ___ aqm mailing

Re: [aqm] I-D Action: draft-ietf-aqm-recommendation-04.txt

Hi all, quick comment on ledbat. The main use case for bitTorrent was huge buffers in home routers (where in fact the configuration could be changed by the user but usually the user does not know what to do and just keeps the default config and complains about bitTorrent disturbing Skype

Re: [aqm] splat start?

Hi Dave, Michael Scharf performed his PhD thesis on start up mechanisms. Here is one of his papers (from 2009): Scharf, M.: Work in Progress: Performance Evaluation of Fast Startup Congestion Control Schemes Proceedings of the 8th IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference (Networking 2009), Lecture

[aqm] Review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-03

Hi Gorry, hi Michael, as promised here is my review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-03. My overall comment is that even after reading the document (or even slightly more than before) I'm not completely sure what the purpose of this document is and also what the audience is this documented is