Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> A stronger approach will be to consider combining the Layer 3 routing > protocol with the L2 IEEE 802.1Qca which provide SPB on multiple paths > (editor: janos.far...@ericsson.com). Sorry if dumb question -- but since Qca appears to depend on SPB, could you please clarify what is the relationshi

Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Philippe Klein
Allow me to elaborate. The whole hybrid home network that include Ethernet, coax, power-line and in the near future bridgeable wireless links (see the 802.11ak draft) could be modeled as a collection of Ethernet P2P wires and pseudo P2P wires interconnected by L2 bridges. These bridges could

Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Philippe Klein
Sorry. Typo ☺. I meant a split model in which a single CPE control multiple distributed CPs…. /Ph From: Randy Turner [mailto:rtur...@amalfisystems.com] Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:22 AM To: Philippe Klein Cc: Dave Taht; Hans Liu; HOMENET Working Group; STARK, BARBARA H; Claire Cheng; aqm@iet

Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Randy Turner
Is there a typo or paste error below? The text reads : "...and an optional distributed model in which a centralized...(snip)" Is it centralized or distributed? Randy > On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:36 AM, Philippe Klein wrote: > > IEEE 1905.1 is a protocol that has been designed (I was one of the in

Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Philippe Klein
IEEE 1905.1 is a protocol that has been designed (I was one of the initial designer)for building a topology data base of the hybrid home network for diagnostic purpose (despite the initial claim in the PAR) and not a protocol for dynamic purpose (for example as it’s the message traffic was in

Re: [aqm] [homenet] IEEE 1905.1 and 1905.1a

2015-03-27 Thread Dave Taht
up until this moment I had never heard of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1905 this spec, and it does sound useful. +10 on more open access to it. +100 on anyone working on open source code for it. I would certainly like closer relationships between the IEEE and IETF one day, perhaps even a t