[aqm] working group status

2015-01-13 Thread Wesley Eddy
Hi, to get 2015 started, Richard and I as chairs put together a set of milestone status notes for the AQM working group items. Please note, that there are a few relatively short drafts that should not require much work, but which haven't been very actively discussed on the list. Comments on these

Re: [aqm] working group status

2015-02-03 Thread Fred Baker (fred)
> On Jan 13, 2015, at 5:09 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > > Hi, to get 2015 started, Richard and I as chairs put together a set of > milestone status notes for the AQM working group items. > > Please note, that there are a few relatively short drafts that should > not require much work, but which hav

[aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-01 Thread Wesley Eddy
Hello; the AQM list has been mostly quiet recently, other than discussion around the IESG comments on our drafts as they progress through the IESG review, so I thought it would be a good time to send a status snapshot and start more discussion about rechartering. The datatracker page tells the

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-01 Thread Bob Briscoe
Wes, Thanks for raising this. *PI2** *The work Koen presented in ICCRG in Buenos Aires on making PIE scale better comes under your category of 'improvements to current algos' that could be documented. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-iccrg-3.pdf There's currently not a dra

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-01 Thread David Lang
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, Wesley Eddy wrote: - Are the current couple of algorithms all that's needed for the Internet, or are there other algorithms building on these, learning from experience with them, or making other improvements which we should work on? (e.g. we have the DualQ draft, and recen

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-02 Thread Dave Täht
On 6/1/16 7:10 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > Hello; the AQM list has been mostly quiet recently, other than > discussion around the IESG comments on our drafts as they progress > through the IESG review, so I thought it would be a good time to send a > status snapshot and start more discussion about r

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-13 Thread Bob Briscoe
Dave, On 02/06/16 17:54, Dave Täht wrote: On 6/1/16 7:10 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote: Hello; the AQM list has been mostly quiet recently, other than discussion around the IESG comments on our drafts as they progress through the IESG review, so I thought it would be a good time to send a status snaps

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-20 Thread Mirja Kühlewind
Hi Dave, hi all, > Am 02.06.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Dave Täht : > > My own desire is to see more link layers - wifi, 5g, 6lowpan, homeplug, > especially, explored with more implementations. There is also new stuff > like threads, wifi direct/p2p, and this new ieee effort, > http://standards.ieee.or

Re: [aqm] working group status and rechartering vs. closing

2016-06-20 Thread Dave Täht
On 6/20/16 12:46 PM, Mirja Kühlewind wrote: > Hi Dave, hi all, > >> Am 02.06.2016 um 18:54 schrieb Dave Täht : >> >> My own desire is to see more link layers - wifi, 5g, 6lowpan, homeplug, >> especially, explored with more implementations. There is also new stuff >> like threads, wifi direct/p2p