Delayed Mail

2000-08-01 Thread Edenyard
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 17:18:12 -0500, Pete Randolph said: > Yesterday I recieved my fifth Arachne-Announce re A166...Anyone else? > Yes - I think that I got six. To be fair, one set of duplicates was because I was subscribed to the announce list by two different addresses (which I've now hopefu

Re: Linux

2000-08-01 Thread Or Botton
Steven wrote: > Michael is now moving in this direction too. I have not seen any hint for this. Or Botton [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Truth is stranger then fiction, since fiction has to make sense." -

Re: Linux

2000-08-01 Thread Clarence Verge
On Tue, 01 Aug 2000 00:44:35 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: > > I shall explode your package tonite and report on it tomorrow. Hello again; I don't have to wait for morning to report. Unfortunately your version does not use an UMSDOS filesystem and looks like too much work to get going. After all

Re: Linux

2000-08-01 Thread Clarence Verge
On Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:12:38 +, Steven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As some of you may remember, I have been interested in developing > a mini-Linux which winDOS people can use to run the Linux version > of Arachne. Please don't jump on me guys, but it appears that > Michael is now moving in

Re: 1nol IP addresses

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 11:24:23 -0700, Richard Burckhardt wrote: > Norm, > Try these: > Domain Name servers: > primary=204.178.185.5 > secondary=204.178.185.105 I noted that the DNS numbers named above are the same that I use with my account with the DialFree ISP. This means that DialFree and N

Linux

2000-08-01 Thread Steven
As some of you may remember, I have been interested in developing a mini-Linux which winDOS people can use to run the Linux version of Arachne. Please don't jump on me guys, but it appears that Michael is now moving in this direction too. I have now assembled such a mini-Linux. It is available

Re: BUG in A166 located !!

2000-08-01 Thread Glenn McCorkle
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 12:30:32 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric S. Emerson) wrote: > Hi Glenn, > Thanks. I did a file compare on your config (GACF.TXT) > and mine (EACF.TXT). See results below. Please comment as > appropriate. > Eric > Comparing files EACF.TXT and GACF.TXT > * EACF.T

Serious problem with A1.66

2000-08-01 Thread Clarence Verge
Hello Michael, All; I have been using Arachne 1.66 quite a bit lately for testing, and have found that an old problem has returned. :-(( On my P90 at home, it takes A166 *26* seconds to load either: Options | Preferences or Conf_PPP.htm (arachne:pppsetup) from cache. It seems like she gets the in

Re: creating glue headers for smtpop

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Tue, 1 Aug 00 10:15:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Howard Schwartz) wrote: >> The glue header format used by SMTPOP.EXE is one of several "standard" ones >> specified in RFC822. The format is the same as the header format that >> is produced automagically by the Barebones DOS email system. SMTPOP

Re: authenticated smtp

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:30:28 EST, Neil Parks wrote: > For example, if I send a msg from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", the smtp host at > mailandnews.com refuses to accept it. If I send the same msg but my From > line contains "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", then m-and-n recognizes that as a > legit user and accepts

Re: Always uncheck "use signature" when sending SPAM report

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000 13:21:45 EST, Neil Parks wrote: > You're lucky to do even that well with spamcop. If I simply "forward" a > spam, spamcop tends to confuse the header on my outbound msg with the > header of the orig spam, and tries to generate a report to my ISP. The way to do it is to addres

Re: Always uncheck "use signature" when sending SPAM reports

2000-08-01 Thread Eric S. Emerson
Hi Sam, Howard, et al, Same happened here too! But, IIRC it was automatic reboot. I never did see that cartoon. I saw some of the others tho'. Eric Sam Heywood wrote: > >On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 07:52:11 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] >(Howard Eisenberger) wrote: > >>

RE: 1nol IP addresses

2000-08-01 Thread Richard Burckhardt
Norm, Try these: Domain Name servers: primary=204.178.185.5 secondary=204.178.185.105 Email servers, set both POP3 (receive) and SMTP (send) to: mail.1nol.com Newsgroup server: news.1nol.com Later, Richard Burckhardt >Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 20:45:07 -0400 (EDT) >From: "Norman C.

Re: Always uncheck "use signature" when sending SPAM report

2000-08-01 Thread Neil Parks
On 1 Aug 00 at 9:51, arachne-digest wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Howard Eisenberger) > Check out http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=2728 for > another way to deal with spam. :-) Have tried that URL several times with 1.66/DOS, and can't get anything but Memory Allocati

authenticated smtp

2000-08-01 Thread Neil Parks
On 31 Jul 00 at 12:26, arachne-digest wrote: (Sam Heywood said:) > >I can use Arachne InSight and other DOS-based email clients to access my > free email accounts at http://www.subdimension.com and at > http://www.telebot.com. With Arachne InSight and also with other various > DOS email clients,

creating glue headers for smtpop

2000-08-01 Thread Howard Schwartz
> The glue header format used by SMTPOP.EXE is one of several "standard" ones > specified in RFC822. The format is the same as the header format that > is produced automagically by the Barebones DOS email system. SMTPOP.EXE > will work just fine as a standalone program provided you write the

Re: Always uncheck "use signature" when sending SPAM report

2000-08-01 Thread Neil Parks
On 31 Jul 00 at 12:26, arachne-digest wrote: > From: "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If we should inadvertently forget to uncheck "use signature" when > sending a SPAM report to [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the machine at > spamcop that processes the SPAM will flag http://home.arach

Re: SMTP Authorization [Was: Re: SMTPserver problem]

2000-08-01 Thread Eko Priono
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 16:58:00 +, Bastiaan wrote: > does this mean that you do not use your ISP (the one with > the local phone number and the one that is not relaying) > but first go via internet to http://mail.telkom.net/ and > then activate the e-mail functions? Yes, I could chose whatever

Re: Always uncheck "use signature" when sending SPAM reports

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 07:52:11 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Howard Eisenberger) wrote: > Check out http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=2728 for > another way to deal with spam. :-) I attempted to access the page twice with images on. Both times I received the error message "Illegal xS

Re: Need a teeny bitta help

2000-08-01 Thread Joerg Dietze
Hi folks, On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:10:25 -0400, Roger Turk wrote: > Zach, > PCMCIA modems are bears to use under DOS. First, you need an "enabler," which > isn't hard to find. Then you need a "socket" driver. There must be a specific PCMCIA driver to activate the slots. This is specific to You

How to use SMTPOP.EXE as a standalone to send mail

2000-08-01 Thread sheywood
Hello: A few minutes ago I used SMTPOP.EXE as a standalone to send two messages to the list, subject: "Howto use insight as standalone to send mail". The messages are identical, except that in the first message I failed to end the message by placing a period by itself on the last line. Please ref

Re: Howto use insight as standalone to send mail

2000-08-01 Thread sheywood
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:47:04 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote: > As for SMTPOP12, it seemed to be sending, but never reached the destination, > apparently because of a nonstandard glue header format. The glue header format used by SMTPOP.EXE is one of several "standard" ones specified in RFC82

Re: More on www.orbs.org....

2000-08-01 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:46:58 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote: >> I can use Arachne InSight and other DOS-based email clients to access my > free email accounts at http://www.subdimension.com and at > http://www.telebot.com. With Arachne InSight and also with other various > DOS email clients,

Re: Howto use insight as standalone to send mail

2000-08-01 Thread sheywood
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 03:47:04 -0400 (EDT), Thomas Mueller wrote: > As for SMTPOP12, it seemed to be sending, but never reached the destination, > apparently because of a nonstandard glue header format. The glue header format used by SMTPOP.EXE is one of several "standard" ones specified in RFC82