Re: *any* smtp? [was Re: Authentication

2000-10-14 Thread Kali McLaughlin
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:32:19 -0400, L.D. Best wrote: > Any time the government becomes involved in something as essential [5 > years ago, no -- now, YES] as the internet, things can only get worse. ..I hope you are talking about *your* government... Essential services in Australia used to be tru

Re: notice of violation

2000-10-14 Thread Samuel W. Heywood
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 11:46:35 +0010, Joerg Dietze wrote: > Hi folks, > it's clear that Arachne needs a spell and grammar checker badly... In all seriousness I will have to disagree on that note... To check spelling in any email message, all you have to do is to configure your Arachne to work w

Re: notice of violation

2000-10-14 Thread Arachne4Dos
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:25:50 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Thu, 12 Oct 2000 21:17:18 +0100, Arachne4Dos ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Haw Terri, gonny gies us a brek 'n 'at? Ah'll stert postin' in >>braid >> lallans 'n glasgae like this aw ra time if ye want me tae, an' >>rat'll >> reall

Re: *any* smtp? [was Re: Authentication

2000-10-14 Thread Bernie
Howard wrote: >> > It's pretty useless IMHO since you can't (AFAIK) use it to subscribe >> > to mailinglists (you can not verify who it was that sent the mail in >> > a good way). > >I don't see any reason why you can't subscribe to a mailing list >using direct to MX. Mailing lists should use e-ma

Re: *any* smtp? [was Re: Authentication

2000-10-14 Thread Bernie
Sam wrote: >It would help a lot. A US law could prohibit all ISPs located in the US >from accepting email messages from ISPs located in countries that aren't >serious about stopping spammers. I assume you mean ban *all* traffic from the outside - you can not verify the packages to see if they ar

Re: C vs. ASM

2000-10-14 Thread Clarence Verge
Michael Polak wrote: > > You argument about C vs. ASM is very funy. > > C *is* ASM. Ha. (Another technical term) C is "C". Certainly not anywhere near "ASM". > Additionaly, you can specify which variables in C code should be stored > directly in registers, which means that some portions of th

re: The Grammar Sherriff (Auld Scots Spelling)

2000-10-14 Thread Arachne4Dos
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 10:07:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On 13 Oct 00 at 20:26, Arachne4Dos wrote: > >> >> Spanish grammar has around 14 tenses as I remember, so perhaps we >> should be thankful English has so (by comparison) few! ISTR names >> along the lines of "Post indicative future participle

Re: notice of violation

2000-10-14 Thread Arachne4Dos
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000 18:57:14 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >J J Young wrote: >> >> Mel asserted: >> >Remember also, the only Scotch items are "Scotch Whisky", "Scotch >> >Tomatoes" and "Scotch Eggs" Everything else is Scottish. >> >> Could that be sensibly represented with a Venn diagram? Have

OT: Really Final words on TSX 32bit OS

2000-10-14 Thread Richard Menedetter
Hi 13 Oct 2000, Clarence Verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> CV> My experience with Linux has been limited to relatively small >> CV> hand-made distros like Dragon and Pygmy. >> Than you shouldn't generalize ... CV> Well, both DRAGON and PYGMY are only twice as big as TSX so IMNVHO it CV

Positively Really Final words on TSX 32bit OS

2000-10-14 Thread J J Young
Take a look at the Windows 2000 source code : ftp://ftp.galilei.com/library/upload/win2ksrc.txt

Re: (OT) Re: notice of violation

2000-10-14 Thread Eric S. Emerson
Hi Clarence, Just a guess, but I think it is kind of like writing ASM. You keep a good ASM bible close at hand! I'm sure Terri has a "grammar bible". Also if one uses the correct grammar often enough then he doesn't have to think about it too hard. It happens almost automatically.

re: The Grammar Sherriff (Auld Scots Spelling)

2000-10-14 Thread Alejandro Lieber
On 13 Oct 00 at 20:26, Arachne4Dos wrote: > > Spanish grammar has around 14 tenses as I remember, so perhaps we > should be thankful English has so (by comparison) few! ISTR names > along the lines of "Post indicative future participles" and so on. I > was just glad that Rafael, my tutor said

rfc2109

2000-10-14 Thread Michael Polak
I have just found out that full cookie specification is described in rfc2109, so I hope next release of Arachne will be 100% compatible with existing cookie standards. -- http://arachne.cz/ (Arachne WWW browser for DOS+Linux / Webhosting / MP3streaming)

C vs. ASM

2000-10-14 Thread Michael Polak
You argument about C vs. ASM is very funy. C *is* ASM. It doesn't meet some of the the criteria for higher programming laguage: usage of pointers cannot be avoided, there is no strict type checking and overriding pointer types is sometimes the only way to go, and additionaly, there is no special

Re: notice of violation

2000-10-14 Thread Joerg Dietze
Hi folks, it's clear that Arachne needs a spell and grammar checker badly... Regards Joerg Neu: Voice/Fax Mailbox 0180/505253996299 -- This mail was written by user of Arachne, the Ultimate Internet Client -- Arachne V1.65, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/