Hi Sam,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 01:47:51 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:20:47 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22770.html
>> Of course, M$ did have 3 wins over Linux.
>> Three? Is that all??? ;-)
>> - Steve
> Ques
Hi Clarence and all,
PLEASE don't remove this! It IS a feature :-).
Regards Joerg
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 15:33:15 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> Hi Joerg;
> Yes, we've known about that interesting little bit for some time now.
> Arachne reacts to HTML in the header because Insight leaves it
> th
anarkissed wrote:
>
> I had it running briefly on a 486dx66 with 32MB RAM and
> even pared down
What paring did you do? Did you stop unnecessary services?
Did you have a KDE or Gnome desktop? Which window manager?
> and doing nothing I had to wait for the cursor to catch
> up to the mouse.
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 16:53:22 -0400, Glenn wrote:
> No problem.
> Your assumption is correct.
> W95 uses its own "built-in" disk cacheing capabilities.
> You only need to load "dumbdrive" when you boot directly to DOS and
> do not run win.com
Thank's Glenn, ATM I'm keeping the evil empire in re
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 11:04:44 +0100 (CET), you wrote:
> Hi
> 10 Nov 2001, "Laurie L Proud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LP> It does not seem to make an improvement if I load Smartdrive.
LP> Everything seems to work very well now, and speed is very good. Now I
LP> know I am on dodgy ground asking t
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 04:28:01 -0400, I wrote:
Hi List,
Now I know I am on dodgy ground asking this but...Is W 95 cacheing my
harddrive by using something other than Smartdrive.exe ??
Please don't beat me. ;-)
And my Mentor Clarence responded:
> I'm not going to beat you.
> I'm just not speaki
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 23:20:47 -0500 (EST), Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22770.html
> Of course, M$ did have 3 wins over Linux.
> Three? Is that all??? ;-)
> - Steve
Questions:
In the Linux world, are there any full-fledged word processor
applicati
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/22770.html
Of course, M$ did have 3 wins over Linux.
Three? Is that all??? ;-)
- Steve
At 09:10 AM 11/14/01 +, you wrote:
> > The systems I've had that ran the GUIs at all were
> > so slow I couldn't wait.
>
>486 systems? How much RAM?
I had it running briefly on a 486dx66 with 32MB RAM and even pared down and
doing nothing I had to wait for the cursor to catch up to the mou
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, "Sam Ewalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
re: Re: Arachne improvements
snip-
> I wonder if they are still pursuing their lawsuit against Microsoft
> about MS-DOS and DR-DOS. The last I heard, the case was stalled
> in a Utah court due to Microsoft dela
At 07:13 AM 11/13/01 -0500, you wrote:
> Is there a LUG (Linux User's Group) in your city?
>There are always knowledgeable and helpful people
>there, and in person they can *show* you things in a
>way not possible over e-mail.
I tried that one year. They said they didn't have time. No intere
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:48:35 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote:
> Hi folks,
> with Steves message, Insight produces following HTML code:
[ snipped ]
Hi Joerg;
Yes, we've known about that interesting little bit for some time now.
Arachne reacts to HTML in the header because Insight leaves it
there, so
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:09:48 -0600, anarkissed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:22 PM 11/12/01 -0500, you wrote:
>> If you work at learning Linux for 1 minute each day
>> for 4 years, then you'll likely forget more than you'll
>> retain. If you work at learning Linux in a systematic
>> manne
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 02:11:39 +, Bastiaan Edelman wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:04:10 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I haven't been able to pick up why Arachne listers stopped
>> at 1.61 and 1.62 but I drive a 32-year-old car; its not much
>> encouragement for Polak when he press
anarkissed wrote:
>
> The things people have said about linux being fast
> on survPCs seem to apply only to the CLI version,
> the gui seems far harsher.
There's a big range of survPCs. Linux won't run at
all on a 286 (or older). With a 386, you can run
Linux with a CLI, but you should forg
Ray Andrews wrote:
>
> I have tried several times to make the jump to that
> OS, but, so far, I have found virtually nothing in the
> way of documentation to help a DOS lover like me make
> the transition.
You will probably find the transition to Linux more
comfortable if you alias the most
Hi Glenn and all,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 11:37:24 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:48:35 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> with Steves message, Insight produces following HTML code:
>>
>> Mail:Re: "...Hehe
> And right there --^--- is the problem.
> You have the li
Thomas Tabler wrote:
>
> I can mount BasicLinux, but don't understand Wordstar
> function keys,
Fair enough, I'm not familiar with Wordstar myself.
> Pico,
What's the problem with pico? The special keys are
displayed at the bottom of the screen. Just use the
normal cursor keys to move ar
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:48:35 +0100, Joerg Dietze wrote:
> Hi folks,
> with Steves message, Insight produces following HTML code:
>
> Mail:Re: "...Hehe
And right there --^--- is the problem.
You have the little red box in the upper-left of your screen again on
this message too. (don't you?) ;
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 04:31:49 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 04:19:47 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> I browsed http://www.nettamer.net/tamer.html last night, and it looked the
> same
>> as it did many months ago, same version, latest beta has no graphics. So it
>> could be
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 18:08:56 +, Ray Andrews wrote:
> I sympathize with you problems with linux. I have tried several times to
> make the jump to that OS, but, so far, I have found virtually nothing in the
> way of documentation to help a DOS lover like me make the transition. It
> seems t
Dear Wiz:
Thanks for the post. I agree that Arachne could use some improvement
but I don't have more time to work on her right now. I use Arachne
for all my main Internet needs at home, but I don't have a workable
Linux. I can mount BasicLinux, but don't understand Wordstar function
k
On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 19:04:10 + (UTC), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hallo Bastiaan : -
> You wrote on the Arachne page but I have to reply direct as I've a
> little bit of configuring to do before I could send something to the
> list.
I'll forward this to the list.
> I never used MSwindows as
I've been experimenting with the "Make a mailing list" function of
Insight. It works ok, but there is a problem. It makes a blind list
that shows up in "to" field as just "@listname". This confuses
recipients and also makes it impossible form them to respond to
all recipients because all the recip
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 08:09:36 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> real world !== microsoft world
Yeah, you know, the place where most people live. I don't want
to go there if I don't have to.
Sam Ewalt
Croswell, Michigan, USA
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 04:19:47 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I wonder if they are still pursuing their lawsuit against Microsoft
> about MS-DOS and DR-DOS. The last I heard, the case was stalled
> in a Utah court due to Microsoft delaying tactics.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, anarkissed wrote:
> If I could find one freaking course for beginners in this stupid city I
> could use the system. I am not autodidactic. I cannot create my own
> lesson plan from man pages. I do not learn from books alone.
My wife is like that. She had a loom in
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 03:46:54 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> I'd prefer Arachne to remain simple and functional. If I need or
> want multiple windows, I already have many functional alternatives
> in the real world.
real world !== microsoft world
Sam Heywood
-- This mail was written by user of The
Hello Ray,
Yes, I know an outstanding UNIX book for DOS lovers like you and me. It's
called: UNIX for DOS Users by Martin R. Arick published by John Wiley &
Sons 1995. I think it's exactly what you want.
Michael Snowden
Sumner, New
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 04:19:47 -0500 (EST), Thomas Mueller wrote:
> I browsed http://www.nettamer.net/tamer.html last night, and it looked the same
> as it did many months ago, same version, latest beta has no graphics. So it
> could be worse for Arachne. Now whatever became of WebSpyder?
WebSp
from Sam Ewalt:
>It's encourging that some interest remains. With some energy from
>Michael, you guys could make a differance.
>I love Arachne and always hope for improvement. But it's clear
>that change will be slow in coming.
I browsed http://www.nettamer.net/tamer.html last night, and it loo
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 00:34:45 -0600, Glenn Gilbreath Jr. wrote:
> What I mean by "multiple documents" is just that...even the old DosLynx
> version 0.9 (or 0.16 if using Wayne Buttle's version) will let you have
> more than one open document at a time...call it a "window" or a "pane"
Maybe that
32 matches
Mail list logo
