On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 13:54:04 +0100, Mel Evans wrote:
> Opera is an excellent vehicle for those with Win machines who don't
> want to clutter up drives with M$ bloat. It does most (not quite all)
And it's FAST Especially noticable on a slow machine...
> For e-mail I find Pocomail an excellent
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 21:52:15 -0400, Roger Turk wrote:
>Once again I plead for two things for Arachne:
>
>1.ability to access secure sites
>
>2.javascript ability.
>
>With regards to #1, if Opera (a Norwegian browser) is able to have
>secure
>site capability, why can't Arachne?
Hi Roger an
Once again I plead for two things for Arachne:
1.ability to access secure sites
2.javascript ability.
With regards to #1, if Opera (a Norwegian browser) is able to have secure
site capability, why can't Arachne? About a year or so ago, an encryption
developer was reported as moving
On Sat, 07 Jun 2003 09:18:30 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Glenn, I am using 1.70r3 and I just checked my "sent mail" folder
> and found 1291 messages!!! So how is that possible if the old limit
> was 512?
I just checked the SRC code for Insight.exe and I must 'eat my words'. :(
--- found in i
On Thu, 05 Jun 2003 23:13:27 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Be it 'inbox', 'outbox', \mail\oldstuff\*.mes, etc... etc
> The *new* limit is now 1024
> But since you are still usimng v1.66.
> You are still stuck with 512
Glenn, I am using 1.70r3 and I just checked my "sent mail" folder
..
.
Glenn McCorkle
Really great to see your continuing interest and
efforts, Glenn.
That 512 maximum for Arachne... is that just for
the Inbox, or is that 512 max for a POP3 download,
or is that 512 maximum for all Folders combined ??
On Sun, 01 Jun 2003 21:04:03 +, Ross Virgin wrote:
> ...
> ..
> Glenn McCorkle
> Really great to see your continuing interest and
> efforts, Glenn.
> That 512 maximum for Arachne... is that just for
> the Inbox, or is that 512 max for a POP3 download,
> or is th
- Original Message -
From: "L.D. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:13 PM
Subject: What are you doing wrong? [was Re: Arachne Wish List
> True, with Netscrape etal you can do the CTRL-click to 'batch
mark'
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:55:53 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Sam,
> Over 2 years ago, as a test.sent 600 messages to my own address.
> I found then that the limit in Arachne is 512.
> What is it that you would like to be able to do in sorting of
> large numbers of messages ?
> So-long-as what
On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:30 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> Yep, 34 messages is low volume. If you had a couple of hundred to
>> sort through then Arachne's Insight would drive you crazy.
> I often have multi-hundred messages to plow through, I'v
On Wed, 28 May 2003 12:10:59 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:30 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Someone (now who was it? d***ed if I can remember) told me that he
> downloads the headers only, selects which messages he wants then
> downloads just those, while deleting everything
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:55:53 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Sam,
> Over 2 years ago, as a test.sent 600 messages to my own address.
> I found then that the limit in Arachne is 512.
I know that you had addressed the report of your experiment to The
Other Sam. I would like to report that I
On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:30 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> I know from experience Arachne allows the fastest and SAFEST way [no
> mail opened unless you want it opened] of any of the browsers I've had
> to deal with. The only thing comparable to the ease of handling junk
> mail with Arachne is some o
On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Yep, 34 messages is low volume. If you had a couple of hundred to
> sort through then Arachne's Insight would drive you crazy.
I guess it would at that
> Yes, we can hope that improvements are coming from Glenn and perhaps
> from others.
E
On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:40 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>> Arachne works ok for low volume situations and is easy to setup
>>> and use. It just has limitations. And it's not apt to be "fixed"
>>> any time soon because of the small number of u
On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Yep, 34 messages is low volume. If you had a couple of hundred to
> sort through then Arachne's Insight would drive you crazy.
I often have multi-hundred messages to plow through, I've used IE & N
both on 'top end' machines, and Arachne is the
16 matches
Mail list logo
