On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 00:21:02 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bonsoir Bob!!!
>> But surely communism is as equally a "pure" system? I may not agree
>> with it, but it is the antithesis of democracy, and in its pure form,
> equal.
> So, Kevin ...
> can I assume that you'll be attending the 1
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 "Kevin JCJD Symons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 , Sam Ewalt wrote:
>
> > But, in my humble opinion the world is not yet ready to abolish
> > government. The only hope for the world is democracy--a fair and
> > just self government.
>
> But surely communi
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 23:00:37 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:54:29 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:31:41 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:29:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
Most likely...
The world-as-we-kno
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:54:29 +1000, Ron Clarke wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:31:41 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:29:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>>> Most likely...
>>> The world-as-we-know-it would come to a screaching halt. ;-)
>> I doubt it. Voting in F
Hi Folks,
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:31:41 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:29:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> Most likely...
>> The world-as-we-know-it would come to a screaching halt. ;-)
> I doubt it. Voting in Fed and State elections is compulsory in
> Australia, and I susp
On Monday, July 7, 2003 at 09:52:59 -0500,
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ah, but in the good ol' USA there is a big difference.
> In the good ol' USA all government spending, to include
> also all the wasteful government spending, is approved
> of by the people themselves.
In
Hello,
The 80% not getting "off their butts" includes:
~17,000,000 non-citizen adults (~6% of total population)
~19,000,000 registered, non-voting adults (~7%)
~56,000,000 citizen adults not registered to vote (~20%)
~78,800,000 children (~28%)
Leaving us with:
~110,800,000 voting adults (~39%)
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 20:29:38 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> Most likely...
> The world-as-we-know-it would come to a screaching halt. ;-)
I doubt it. Voting in Fed and State elections is compulsory in
Australia, and I suspect we are the better for it
Greg
-- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL c
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:16:31 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 05:44:26 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> No, we need responsible government--a rule of law that respects the
>> rights of individuals to be safe and secure in their persons, homes
>> and families and lets them pursue happin
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 10:42:07 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:44:45 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>> As has already been illustrated... elected by only 20% of us. :(((
>> Therefore, at-best 20% of the population are getting what they want.
> Not even that. They are getting
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:44:45 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> As has already been illustrated... elected by only 20% of us. :(((
> Therefore, at-best 20% of the population are getting what they want.
Not even that. They are getting what their elected representative
decides HE wants after he i
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 09:52:59 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> In the good ol' USA all government spending, to include also all the
> wasteful government spending, is approved of by the people themselves.
They came and asked YOU whether to spend the money on schools, on
weapons, or on "fact findi
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 05:44:26 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
> Thank you, Glenn. "Imagine" is a wonderful, important song. Peace will
> be found first in our own hearts.
Very true.
> But, in my humble opinion the world is not yet ready to abolish
> government. The only hope for the world is democracy--a
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:10:49 -0700, Rick Orr wrote:
>> As has already been illustrated... elected by only 20% of us. :(((
>> Therefore, at-best 20% of the population are getting what they want.
>> The remaining 80% are in-fact being dictated to.
> I wonder what would happen if that 80% got
As has already been illustrated... elected by only 20% of us. :(((
Therefore, at-best 20% of the population are getting what they want.
The remaining 80% are in-fact being dictated to.
I wonder what would happen if that 80% got off their butts & stood up to
be counted?
:-)
later,
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 09:52:59 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 00:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Binky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sunday, July 6, 2003 at 05:58:31 -0500,
>> "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Whenever a country devotes its wealth and resources to
On Mon, 7 Jul 2003 00:17:49 -0700 (PDT), Binky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday, July 6, 2003 at 05:58:31 -0500,
> "Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Whenever a country devotes its wealth and resources to building
>> up its military might to a level far exceeding what is
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 19:28:01 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 05:58:31 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> Note that I had used the word within quotations so as to indicate
>> that the "facts" might not have really been proven as such.
> But to many people the use of "quotes" is on
On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 05:44:26 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> To me,
>> Anarchy == the 100% abolition of all forms of government everywhere.
>> Please read (and try to understand)..
>> http://www.merseyworld.com/imagine/lyrics/imagine.htm
> Thank you, Glenn. "Imagine" is a wonderful, important son
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 17:19:21 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> I am in 100% agreement with that piont of view. :)
> This is one of the many reasons why I advocate. Anarchy.
> To me,
> Anarchy == the 100% abolition of all forms of government everywhere.
> Please read (and try to understand)
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 05:58:31 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> Note that I had used the word within quotations so as to indicate
> that the "facts" might not have really been proven as such.
But to many people the use of "quotes" is only another method of
"emphasizing" a word or a statement, if y
On Sunday, July 6, 2003 at 05:58:31 -0500,
"Samuel W. Heywood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Whenever a country devotes its wealth and resources to building
> up its military might to a level far exceeding what is reasonable
> and necessary for providing for the country's defense and security,
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 05:58:31 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> "FACTS" are pieces of information which have been PROVEN to be TRUE.
> If by definition all "FACTS" are statements that have been PROVEN to be
> TRUE, then why do we always hear so many politicians and news analysts
> using the phr
On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 12:24:11 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> All governments tell many lies. Bad governments tell lies about good
> governments and good governments retalliate by telling lies about bad
> governments.
Please define, Bad government: , Good government: ;-)
> If the truth wer
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 20:17:23 +00, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote:
> To launch a war on a nation is a very serious matter and the evidence
> should be solid, very solid.
> The evidence for weapons of mass destruction has been very soft and it
> still is. To present it to the American people (and t
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:06:37 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:00:10 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>> Most people who know anything at all
>> about the value of military intelligence know that the "facts" ar
To launch a war on a nation is a very serious matter and the evidence
should be solid, very solid.
The evidence for weapons of mass destruction has been very soft and it
still is. To present it to the American people (and the world) as hard
core evidence is a lie.
Making it an urgent matter, THAT
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 18:06:37 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:00:10 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>>> Hi
>>> Go to http://www.google.com
>>> enter weapons of mass destruction into the searchfield
>>> and pre
On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 11:00:10 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
>> Hi
>> Go to http://www.google.com
>> enter weapons of mass destruction into the searchfield
>> and press the I'm feeling lucky button.
>> read and start to think.
>>
On Sat, 05 Jul 2003 13:30:28 +0200, Richard Menedetter wrote:
> Hi
> Go to http://www.google.com
> enter weapons of mass destruction into the searchfield
> and press the I'm feeling lucky button.
> read and start to think.
> Naturally this 404 - not found page is meant only as a joke.
> But it
Hi
Go to http://www.google.com
enter weapons of mass destruction into the searchfield
and press the I'm feeling lucky button.
read and start to think.
Naturally this 404 - not found page is meant only as a joke.
But it really gives me the creep, if a elected (??) leader of a
democratic country c
31 matches
Mail list logo
