On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Chris Young wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 20:11:26 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>
>>> I can send you my !Boot privately if you want to have a look?
>>
>> Sure, feel free to send it my way.
>
> Attached. It may have some crazy updates installed, I forget.
Now fi
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Chris Young wrote:
> I tried moving Repeat out of the Library dir so it wouldn't find it,
> but it still gives up after looking for $.Library.Repeat and $.Repeat
>
> There's nothing obvious in the !Boot sequence where it runs this file.
> If I rename the entire !Boot dir to sto
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:25:26 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Here's a new version, with the following fixes:
> http://www.phlamethrower.co.uk/misc2/arcem-fast-unix.zip
Works almost perfectly here :) Definitely seems faster too.
It doesn't seem to like my !Boot anymore, which wor
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> Since my code was a bit more broken then I was expecting, I think I'll
> spend today tidying it up a bit, test it on Windows/Linux, and upload a
> new archive with any fixes Chris produces.
Here's a new version, with the following fixes:
http://www.phlame
>>> This week I decided to take a quick break from my OMAP work and instead
>>> had a play around with optimising ArcEm to run faster on ARM hardware
>>> (although I suspect most of the optimisations will benefit other platforms
>>> too).
>>
>> Impressive! Could you re-zip your archive though, as
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Chris Young wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:49 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>> I didn't make any effort to ensure
>> the new memory code ran on big-endian machines, so it wouldn't surprise me
>> if it's failing. Take a look at the LoadByte, StoreByte and Swa
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> The bit that most likely will need modification, however, are the bits in
> FastMap.c which directly access memory as a char *. For those to work on BE
> platforms you'd either need to resort to loading words and shifting or invert
> the lower two bits o
On 1 Aug 2010 11:52:16 +0100, Chris Young wrote:
> fastmap.c isn't even compiled, there's no reference to it in the
> makefile?
Just noticed it's #included by armarc.c. I think I need to chuck some
debug in to compare what is being written to what is being read.
Chris
-
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:38:49 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time), Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Chris Young wrote:
>
> > Well, I say working, there's something wrong as although it appears to
> > work and initialises the display, the ROM either doesn't get executed
> > or at least doesn't get a
