Re: [arch] xorg/gnome hanging

2005-11-28 Thread Michael Salivar
Could you try reinstalling again, this time using the packages strictly off the CD, then not syncing until you put a HoldPkg on the kernel and xorg? Then if no problems arise, specifically install one and then the other to determine the offending package. I'd think the results of an lsmod might

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
--- Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/05, Khashayar Naderehvandi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I guess if your gensplash-bits would have been > merged > > into the official initscripts, you wouldn't have > this > > problem any longer? And I guess they aren't merged > > since

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 11/28/05, Khashayar Naderehvandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess if your gensplash-bits would have been merged > into the official initscripts, you wouldn't have this > problem any longer? And I guess they aren't merged > since the stock kernel doesn't include fbsplash. So > that leads me t

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Khashayar Naderehvandi
I guess if your gensplash-bits would have been merged into the official initscripts, you wouldn't have this problem any longer? And I guess they aren't merged since the stock kernel doesn't include fbsplash. So that leads me to ask; is there any particular reason why fbsplash isn't added to the sto

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 16:21, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > Thread hijack anyone?! > > Newton B. Costa Junior wrote: > > 005/11/28, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>On Monday 28 November 2005 11:03, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: > >>>http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 > >>> > >>

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Thread hijack anyone?! Newton B. Costa Junior wrote: > 005/11/28, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >>On Monday 28 November 2005 11:03, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: >> >>>http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 >>> >>>Maybe not exactly what you meant but is helpful with annoying .pacnew >>>

[arch] pkgbuild-mode for Emacs (new version 0.5)

2005-11-28 Thread Jürgen Hötzel
Hi, i did again some improvements. I hope you like it. Changes: * New interactive function pkgbuild-browse-url (C-c C-u) to visit project's website (Customize your browse-url-browser-function). * emacs 22 (cvs snapshot) compatibility download: http://www.hoetzel.info/Hacking/emacs/pkgbuild-m

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Newton B. Costa Junior
005/11/28, Joe Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 28 November 2005 11:03, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: > > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 > > > > Maybe not exactly what you meant but is helpful with annoying .pacnew > > and .pacsave files. > > > > -- Thank you very much! That is

Re: [arch] Java slow to startup

2005-11-28 Thread Vinay Shastry
if shorewall is the issue here.. i think shorewall's rules block java apps from accessing (communicating with) the "X server" locally. On 11/28/05, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply Vinay, > I've tried disabling Shorewall but it hasn't made a difference for me. >

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 11:03, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: > http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 > > Maybe not exactly what you meant but is helpful with annoying .pacnew > and .pacsave files. > > -- > Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=16754 Maybe not exactly what you meant but is helpful with annoying .pacnew and .pacsave files. -- Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.archlinux.org | www.juvepoland.com ___ arch mailing list arch@arch

Re: [arch] Java slow to startup

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Wilkinson
Thanks for your reply Vinay, I've tried disabling Shorewall but it hasn't made a difference for me. The firewall would explain why Java doesn't load immediately in the browser, but I don't know why that should affect ControlPanel and Maple... Steve On 11/28/05, Vinay Shastry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

[arch] prerelease/mkinitrd/new kernel causing keyboard/mouse hang - was Pre-release iso - gnome hangs

2005-11-28 Thread Paul Hoy
Hi, I tried your suggestion, but without success - hanging of the mouse or keyboard continues. I'm convinced that the problem is related to the new kernel, mkinitrd, and xorg mostly because the hanging occurred as soon as I performed a pacman update. I decided to reinstall using the new p

Re: [arch] Java slow to startup

2005-11-28 Thread Vinay Shastry
from what i see in the gentoo bugs section.. its a firewall issue.. disable your firewall and reboot your machine.. On 11/28/05, Stephen Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having Java problems on my Archlinux installation - there are > three manifestations of the problem: > - Ja

Re: [arch] KDE 3.5: Can't stop KOrganizer daemon

2005-11-28 Thread Ralph Alvy
Joe Giles wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 08:29, Joe Giles wrote: >> On Monday 28 November 2005 08:08, Ralph Alvy wrote: >> > I notice that whenever I load Kontact, the KOrganizer daemon loads and >> > appears in my system tray. How can I stop this? I don't use KOrganizer. >> > >> > >> > _

Re: [arch] KDE 3.5: Can't stop KOrganizer daemon

2005-11-28 Thread pbw
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:36, Joe Giles wrote: > That should do it > > Joe Not in 3.5.. I have same problem. Doesnt bother me too much though as i usually have kontact/kmail already running and dont restart often. ___ arch mailing list arch@arc

Re: [arch] KDE 3.5: Can't stop KOrganizer daemon

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 08:29, Joe Giles wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 08:08, Ralph Alvy wrote: > > I notice that whenever I load Kontact, the KOrganizer daemon loads and > > appears in my system tray. How can I stop this? I don't use KOrganizer. > > > > > > ___

Re: [arch] KDE 3.5: Can't stop KOrganizer daemon

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 08:08, Ralph Alvy wrote: > I notice that whenever I load Kontact, the KOrganizer daemon loads and > appears in my system tray. How can I stop this? I don't use KOrganizer. > > > ___ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > htt

[arch] KDE 3.5: Can't stop KOrganizer daemon

2005-11-28 Thread Ralph Alvy
I notice that whenever I load Kontact, the KOrganizer daemon loads and appears in my system tray. How can I stop this? I don't use KOrganizer. ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Re: [arch] unable to mount cifs

2005-11-28 Thread Geert Smolders
Thanks, it's done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3536 Geert Thomas Bächler wrote: >Geert Smolders schrieb: > > >>so i read here and there, and it seems there is a command to mount cifs: >>mount.cifs >>only: i do not have this command! >> >> > >I can confirm this: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 07:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Monday 28 November 2005 07:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >> >> Georg Grabler wrote: > >> >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >

Re: [arch] unable to mount cifs

2005-11-28 Thread Thomas Bächler
Geert Smolders schrieb: > so i read here and there, and it seems there is a command to mount cifs: > mount.cifs > only: i do not have this command! I can confirm this: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ls -l /sbin/mount.cifs lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 27 02:07 /sbin/mount.cifs -> /usr/bin/cifsmount [EMA

Re: [arch] unable to mount cifs

2005-11-28 Thread Geert Smolders
I see what you mean. But, the 'mnt' dir is in my homefolder, so it should work this way. It does with smbfs, by the way... thanks, Geert Joe Giles wrote >On Monday 28 November 2005 07:26, Geert Smolders wrote: > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] nme]# mount -t cifs //kwepeer/geert2 mnt/usb/ >> >> > >

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread w9ya
> On Monday 28 November 2005 07:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >> >> Georg Grabler wrote: >> >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >> >> >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it

Re: [arch] unable to mount cifs

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 07:26, Geert Smolders wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] nme]# mount -t cifs //kwepeer/geert2 mnt/usb/ Just as an observation, but in your command: [EMAIL PROTECTED] nme]# mount -t cifs //kwepeer/geert2 mnt/usb/ you are missing the / in front of the mnt. mount might think this

[arch] unable to mount cifs

2005-11-28 Thread Geert Smolders
Hello kind Arch people, I have been using CIFS for some time now, because it 'feels' a bit faster than smbfs and, according to experts, i feel this correctly. However, since a few days my cifs-mounts have stopped working! I had and still have no clue as to why this is happening. Here are the fac

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 07:17, Joe Giles wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 07:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > >> Georg Grabler wrote: > > >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > >> >>Well,

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 07:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >> Georg Grabler wrote: > >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >> >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as oft

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread w9ya
> On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >> Georg Grabler wrote: >> > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >> >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often >> as he likes if it was pkg'ed separately. I think most people

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Joe Giles
On Monday 28 November 2005 04:15, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > Georg Grabler wrote: > > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as > >>he likes if it was pkg'ed separately. I think most people hav

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Georg Grabler wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as >>he likes if it was pkg'ed separately. I think most people have to do >>the .pacnew tango when they update their initscripts and tha

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Georg Grabler
On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as > he likes if it was pkg'ed separately.  I think most people have to do > the .pacnew tango when they update their initscripts and that's > frustrating when the

[arch] Java slow to startup

2005-11-28 Thread Stephen Wilkinson
Hello, I'm having Java problems on my Archlinux installation - there are three manifestations of the problem: - Java applets take 3 minutes to start in Firefox. - Java ControlPanel (/opt/java/jre/bin/ControlPanel on my system) takes 3 minutes to start - Maple's Java interface takes 3 minutes to st

Re: [arch] Annoying initscripts updates!

2005-11-28 Thread Philip Dillon-Thiselton
Judd Vinet wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 10:56:10PM +, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Touche. You know, you could have just said, "Shut up, Phil." and saved >>yourself some typing. > > > Hehe, I didn't want to insult, Phil. Ah but instead you treated me like a distro hoping whinner

Re: [arch] Missing Email

2005-11-28 Thread A. S. Budden
Ok, I've had another word with him this morning and I think we've found out what went wrong, so thanks to all for the help. It seems he subscribed via the web interface with "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", but all new UK accounts are set up to use "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" now, so the outgoing mail came from that