[arch] hplip: depends on LSB?

2007-07-29 Thread sajko
hi just tried to configure hplip printer driver, but on hp-check i get that LSB (Linux Standard Base) is not installed. Indeed on hplip official page that "dependancy" is mentioned: http://hplip.sourceforge.net/install/manual/distros/other.html i seem to be unable to find the package on official

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > X was "eXperimental" and is before 1.0 For me, it a release is pre, alpha, beta, rc, whatever, there is a digit after the suffix. I mean, there is no 1.0pre, there is 1.0pre1. But if there is 1.0pre, a maintainer should add "1" himself. It's simple.

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 7/29/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1.0X and 1.0 > 1.0X is newer because there is no number after X. X was "eXperimental" and is before 1.0 > > 3.4_a and 3.4.a > > 3.4_a is newer because 4_a > 4. These are the same version. I just renamed the tarball. > > 7 and 7_f

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am not saying that you are "questioning something that I believe is > right". I am saying that when versions become alphanumeric, the > decision is 100% arbitrary, and trying to say that one way is right > and one way is wrong is pretty dumb. Is

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Aaron Griffin
On 7/29/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Again, you look like a fool. > > Because I'm questioning something you are convinced you're right > about? Do you know what discussions are for? First you discuss > something, get op

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Benoit Myard
On 28/07/07, Benoit Myard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, we could argue for a whole year and come up with a completly > different conclusion but I hope we won't. Enough of that. -- Benoit Myard ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archl

Re: [arch] [security] Alert on Bind Fixed

2007-07-29 Thread Roman Kyrylych
2007/7/29, Johan Grahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > These sercurity warnings, are there any system that generates them or > are there just devs checking the package website? > They are generated by JJDaNiMoTh manually. See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Security_Task_Force for details. They are tra

Re: [arch] [security] Alert on Bind Fixed

2007-07-29 Thread Johan Grahn
These sercurity warnings, are there any system that generates them or are there just devs checking the package website? On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 01:12:00PM +0200, JJDaNiMoTh wrote: > > >Arch Linux Security Warning ALSW 2007-#35 >---

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Again, you look like a fool. Because I'm questioning something you are convinced you're right about? Do you know what discussions are for? First you discuss something, get opinions of others, and then you draw a conclusion which helps you in, like

Re: [arch] Won't update bind & dnsutils (version numbers issue)

2007-07-29 Thread Jaroslaw Swierczynski
2007/7/29, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Say 1.2.3pre is a prerelease. By your rule above, it should be a > higher version than 1.2.3, but it's really a lower version. All you'd need to do is to add 1 to this version, that is 1.2.3pre1. It's really a small price comparing to what maintain