On 7/29/07, Jaroslaw Swierczynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/7/29, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Again, you look like a fool. > > Because I'm questioning something you are convinced you're right > about? Do you know what discussions are for? First you discuss > something, get opinions of others, and then you draw a conclusion > which helps you in, like in this case, making code better. And calling > someone a fool isn't part of discussion as I know it. Or is it > perfectly normal where you live to insult people?
Firstly, I did not call you a fool - I said you looked like a fool. Thats a very important distinction. I am not saying that you are "questioning something that I believe is right". I am saying that when versions become alphanumeric, the decision is 100% arbitrary, and trying to say that one way is right and one way is wrong is pretty dumb. Here, I'll give you and example. Here are three version progressions. Your job is to tell me which order each ones goes in. 1.0X and 1.0 3.4_a and 3.4.a 7 and 7_f What is the correct ordering for these versions? _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
