I guess it's OK if we have enough dev sources, so we can afford to maintain
a big mount of extra packages.
Moving a package to community is more due to "No dev wants to maintain
(without time or interest)" than "it's not popular", in fact I think it's a
choice of reality we can't help out right now
Is there any plan to port pacman to support PackageKit? Just be curious.
___
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
I have thought of change of my distro from Arch to ones with big company
behind once sometimes since I am afraid of such leadership things(I mean a
distro will lost his futuer when original devs leave for more important
things for their own lifes) , but now I am really impressed by the whole
Arch
On 9/27/07, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Essien Ita Essien wrote:
> > sounds interesting... very. Can you give s snippet from the resuling
> > PKGBUILD? sorry i'm a bit slow with _only_ textual descriptions :)
> >
> >
> OK - see if this helps.
>
> Firstly the case where one package is
Again, how about making "makepkg" as a standalone and simple bash scripts
app, seperated from pacman. If there is any technical difficulties please
forgive me, I am not a dev but a user.
On 9/25/07, Mister Dobalina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Richard Uhtenwoldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does pacman support -Ss with "?" or "*" wildcards?
On 9/26/07, Petar Bogdanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 03:55:49AM +0530, Vinay S Shastry wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 Sep 2007 3:43:57 am Petar Bogdanovic wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > from time to time, I would like to d
I think it's better that makepkg could be a standalone application instead
of being part of pacman, but splitted package is a thing I is very much
against, for me even gcc becoming gcc and gcc-libs is dispionting.
On 9/23/07, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/22/07, Alexandre Moreira <[EMA
I have the same problem and reported in the forum before, I believe it's an
upstream bug, quite annoying indeed.
On 7/16/07, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/16/07, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I just included this message, found in the README in the
On Mon, 28 May 2007 11:39:34 -0400
"Dan McGee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2007/5/28, Michael Towers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Is it now allowed to have a '.' in the 'pkgrel'? Was it always allowed?
> > > If so, is it necessary? If not, w
On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:12:06 +0200
Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote:
>
> > Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-)
> > How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken
> > one? I don't even want to mention my dell n
On Sat, 12 May 2007 19:39:33 -0600
"Scott Horowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/13/07, Gan Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > :: gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-0.10-5: local version is up to date.
> > Upgrade
>
> I'm pretty sure that you've spe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gl]# pacman -Qs gtksourceview
local/gtksourceview 1.8.5-2
A text widget adding syntax highlighting and more to GNOME
local/gtksourceview-sharp-2.0 0.10-5
a C# binding to gtksourceview
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gl]# pacman -S gtksourceview-sharp
:: gtksourceview-sharp-2.0-0.10-5: l
ArchLinux 0.8 "micro$oft"
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 22:42 -0400, Slash wrote:
> Arch Linux 0.8 "BladeRunner"
>
> On 5/16/06, Alexandre Moreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > NOW THAT would grant you, sir, a +1 funny if this was slashdot!
> >
> > 2006/5/16, Martin Lefebvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
Vino or something like?
On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 17:22 +0300, Hussam Al-Tayeb wrote:
> Mr Fubar. I don't think you understood. The other PCs are mine. They
> are just not in the same office, and it would be easier to shut them
> down at night without having to go the other room.
> ___
Have any ArchWiki entry already?
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 15:13 -0400, Jason Chu wrote:
> We started a list to bring together people who want to help with multiple
> architecture support in arch. Currently we're still trying to figure out
> how to integrate it in our current processes.
>
> If you'r
do), no
one wants a broken driver.
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 11:04 +0200, Stephane CRONE wrote:
>
> Gan Lu a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 23:16 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:05 +0800, 甘露 wrote:
> >>
> >>>When I switch
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 23:16 +0200, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 09:05 +0800, 甘露 wrote:
> > When I switch back from a X session (saying GNOME) to console, by log
> > out or Alt+Ctrl+F2, my screen got screwed up, and I can't read it.
> > There is very strang Blue or Green box around
17 matches
Mail list logo
