Re: [arch] updating libgtop

2007-01-20 Thread ded
On Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 02:12:46AM +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 22:29 +0000, ded wrote: > > Hi all, > > While updating today I get the following: > > checking package integrity... done. > > loading package data... done. > > checking for

[arch] updating libgtop

2007-01-20 Thread ded
Hi all, While updating today I get the following: checking package integrity... done. loading package data... done. checking for file conflicts... error: the following file conflicts were found: libgtop: /opt/gnome/share/info/dir: exists in filesystem errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

Re: [arch] Pacman's new feature

2007-01-10 Thread ded
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:14:00PM -0200, Denis Alessandro Altoe Falqueto wrote: > On 1/10/07, RedShift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho wrote: > > > On 1/10/07, Israel Junior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> On 1/10/07, Fabiano Furtado Pessoa Coelho wrote: > > >>> Hi

Re: [arch] Pacman slow after upgrade?

2007-01-01 Thread ded
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:49:25PM +0800, Rock Feng wrote: > On 2007/01/01 ?? 13:38:05, Rodrigo Coacci wrote: > >I've noticed that almost any command I give to pacman takes much more time > >than > >it used to take, and that became to happen after I upgraded it. Is that just > >me > >or someone e

Re: [arch] mutagen pkg not found

2006-12-31 Thread ded
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 08:49:50AM +0100, Luca Peduto wrote: > Hi Dan, > I installed the package manually and all seem to work correctly: > pacman -U /var/cache/pacman/pkg/mutagen-1.9-1.pkg.tar.gz Hi Luca, Yes, I used that method to install the rest of the package updates after pacman said that mu

Re: [arch] mutagen pkg not found

2006-12-30 Thread ded
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 01:25:23PM -0500, Greg Meyer wrote: > checking package integrity... > error: archive mutagen-1.9-1.pkg.tar.gz is corrupted Got that with an update yesterday afternoon and again this evening. Dan -- BOFH excuse #446: Mailer-daemon is busy burning your message in hell. __

Re: [arch] christmas gifts

2006-12-26 Thread ded
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 11:23:30PM +0100, RedShift wrote: > Linux detects the USB device, but it isn't detected as an USB mass > storage device :( Output from dmesg: > usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 > usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Check the settin

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.16 and KDE 3.5.5 in Extra

2006-10-27 Thread ded
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:48:06PM +0200, domanov wrote: > > what's the secret for getting 2.16? > > Just wait for your mirror to sync, or change mirror. > > Regard, > domanov > PS: very lucky wife ;) > PPS: and also the husband! :) Thanks for the reply. We run thirteen computers on a home net

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.16 and KDE 3.5.5 in Extra

2006-10-27 Thread ded
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 11:44:22AM -0400, Askadar wrote: > Am Freitag, 27. Oktober 2006 11:28 schrieb ded: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 10:22:53AM -0200, Allen Franco wrote: > > At the risk of appearing silly (I am not an Arch user), pacman -Syu > > doesn't seem to bring

[arch] ATTN List Manager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Out of Office AutoReply: GNOME 2.16 and KDE 3.5.5 in Extra]

2006-10-27 Thread ded
Perhaps you can unsubscribe this individual and stop the auto-replies? Kind Regards, ded - Forwarded message from Simon Paynton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Simon Paynton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:42:02 +0100 To: ded <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subj

Re: [arch] GNOME 2.16 and KDE 3.5.5 in Extra

2006-10-27 Thread ded
er. At the risk of appearing silly (I am not an Arch user), pacman -Syu doesn't seem to bring any of the new gnome 2.16 packages in...what's the secret for getting 2.16? Regards, ded ___ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archl