On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 20:24 -0500, Simo Leone wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:59:07PM -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > 2008/4/11 Ondřej Kučera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Interesting point. I checked up on it and it IS orphaned.
> > I'll CC the dev list to see if anyone is interested in it. If
Hey guys,
So I think ABS is ready to move to rsync.
The final piece, server-side ABS-tree generation, has been completed
with help from Jason.
I've just committed the svn2abs script to git - take a look at it to
get the full details, but in short it does a checkout of the svn repo
(or updates a
I am around most of today.
Hit me up on jabber.
On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> So I think ABS is ready to move to rsync.
>
> The final piece, server-side ABS-tree generation, has been completed
> with help from Jason.
>
> I've just committed the svn2abs s
Hi,
There some problem with the extra x86_64 repo. Acording to the db, the bzr
and graphviz packages are at versions: bzr-1.3-1.1 and graphviz-2.16.1-3.
But the versions of the packages on the server and
which get installed are: bzr-1.3-1 and graphviz-2.18-2
Can someone with more experienc
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
Hi,
I just uploaded an imagemagick package in testing that will require a rebuilt
of the apps that links to its libs because the libraries names have changed.
From imagemagick ChangeLog:
* New Unix/Linux refactoring (should be transparent since cha
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 12:31 -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just uploaded an imagemagick package in testing that will require a
> > rebuilt
> > of the apps that links to its libs because the libraries names have
> > changed.
> > F
To get things going, I'll start some of these rebuilds. If you plan to
rebuild your package this week-end or if you have already rebuilt package
on your local machine and were waiting for the cvs->svn move, let me know.
Locally, I have packages for labplot, pstoedit and vips. I'm working on
kof
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:18 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am around most of today.
> Hit me up on jabber.
Done and done - thanks to eliott, we've gotten the necessary
infrastructure set up on gerolde. I'll be pushing a new ABS package
to testing shortly. ;)
On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:18 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am around most of today.
> > Hit me up on jabber.
>
>
> Done and done - thanks to eliott, we've gotten the necessary
> infrastructure set up on gerolde. I'll be pus
In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
announcement draft:
---8<-8<
ABS 2.0 In Testing
With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
tree, as part of the changes that needed to be made for our internal
move from CVS
2008/4/12, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
> announcement draft:
>
> ---8<-8<
> ABS 2.0 In Testing
>
> With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
> tree, as part of
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds fine to me except #3 - I don't understand it (and I probably
> some users will too).
> Can you explain it please?
Basically, if you had to allow certain ports access to the net through
a firewall. rsync uses di
On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> May as well tell the people what's happening with ABS. Here's an
> announcement draft:
>
> ---8<-8<
> ABS 2.0 In Testing
>
> With version 2, ABS has moved to an rsync method for pulling the ABS
> tree, as
Travis Willard schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Roman Kyrylych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds fine to me except #3 - I don't understand it (and I probably
some users will too).
Can you explain it please?
Basically, if you had to allow certain ports access to the net through
a fi
On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
Should /etc/abs/rsyncd.conf.abs be in the packages etc directory?
Seems like that should be in /usr/share or something, as it is an
example, and not a runtime required configuration file (nor is
Thomas Bächler wrote:
I wouldn't mention that at all. Just mention it now uses rsync, whoever
filters outbound traffic will know exactly what to do.
That's also what I was thinking.
It already mentions that rsync is used, but I would insist on it, for
example, by changing 1) to something l
On 4/12/08, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
>
>
> Should /etc/abs/rsyncd.conf.abs be in the packages etc directory?
>
> Seems like that should be in /usr/share or something, as it is an
>
> 2) modify rsync stanza for [abs] in /etc/rsyncd.conf to allow anyone
I think this might have a negative impact on our mirroring. We only
allow 10 connections total for rsync mirrors and if any large number of
those are used by ABS users, our mirrors will have problems syncing for
sure.
It loo
eliott schrieb:
upgrading from a csup abs config to the new rsync config involved:
1. mv /etc/abs/abs.conf.pacnew /etc/abs/abs.conf
2. rm -f /etc/abs/supfile* (not required..just cleanup)
3. abs
rsync even cleanedup the abs dir for me. :)
Nice work Travis.
*functionality signoff on i686*
Ca
Good call dale.
I will add the stanzas, and see how she handles.
On 4/12/08, Dale Blount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2) modify rsync stanza for [abs] in /etc/rsyncd.conf to allow anyone
>
>
> I think this might have a negative impact on our mirroring. We only
> allow 10 connections total f
On 4/12/08, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eliott schrieb:
>
> > upgrading from a csup abs config to the new rsync config involved:
> > 1. mv /etc/abs/abs.conf.pacnew /etc/abs/abs.conf
> > 2. rm -f /etc/abs/supfile* (not required..just cleanup)
> > 3. abs
> >
> > rsync even cleanedup t
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eliott schrieb:
>
>
> > upgrading from a csup abs config to the new rsync config involved:
> > 1. mv /etc/abs/abs.conf.pacnew /etc/abs/abs.conf
> > 2. rm -f /etc/abs/supfile* (not required..just cleanup)
> > 3. abs
> >
> >
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 4:20 PM, eliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/12/08, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
>
> Should /etc/abs/rsyncd.conf.abs be in the packages etc directory?
>
> Seems like that should be in /usr/share or somet
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Travis Willard wrote:
In testing for signoff. Moved to rsync. Yay!
Now that abs depends on rsync, should rsync be moved to core? Rsync is
currently out-of-date so I (or someone else) could do the update/move at
the same time.
And what about csup? Will it be moved
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Well this sucks. It would be great if I could tell which package
On Sat, 2008-04-12 at 12:59 -0400, Eric Belanger wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> To get things going, I'll start some of these rebuilds. If you plan to
> >> rebuild your package this week-end or if you have already rebuilt package
> >> on your local machine and were waiting for the cvs->svn move, let me kno
27 matches
Mail list logo
