On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I
guess one could get the community tree from here:
http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well
(cvs.archlinux.org does not
On 4/26/08, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I
guess one could get the community tree from here:
http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:36 AM, eliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/26/08, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 6:12 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, is there a reason we had to break CVS links in the AUR interface? I
guess one could get the
eliott schrieb:
http://www.archlinux.org/cvs/, but the information is wrong as well
(cvs.archlinux.org does not exist).
I just added it back into the bind config. It should replicate out to
the slave nameservers in an hour or so..
The information on the website should be updated anyway.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked
in or anything else like that?
Why do you still have uncommitted changes in CVS when we initially
began this move something like 4 or 5 weeks ago. Please
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) There is no web based viewing for community anymore
Sure there is. repos.archlinux.org can display ALL of the old CVS repos too
For
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked
in or anything else like that?
Why do you still have uncommitted changes in
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:42 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does no one else still have changes cached locally they never checked
in
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Issues right now:
1) There is no public SVN checkout method yet
I sent you a personal email about getting
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andreas Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in testing for both arches
Seems to work fine here - signed off x86_64
signoff both arches
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Andreas Radke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in testing for both arches
Seems to work fine, x86_64
I didn't test --lzma, but that is badass!
man page is installed in /usr/man
--
This message has been scanned for
Hi Gang,
I maintained the courier* packages for a long time and I still think it
is a very solid mail server suite. I was using it happyly on my own
server but recently fell for a tarmail/dovecot combination. Abandoning
the usage of courier makes it harder to maintain the package, which is
rather
12 matches
Mail list logo
