I made some minor changes to shadow, and renamed some files in
addition to the version bump.
This one now has libshadow.so again. Whoopsie.
Please test, and criticize. If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be
appreciated too.
Thanks,
Aaron
:wq
One of the things I was thinking about, because sometimes signoffs can
stagnate
Should we have a time-based limit?
That is, if a package has been in testing for X days, with no
complaints, but no signoffs, yet, can we consider it fully functional,
assuming the packager is comfortable with tha
On 8/29/08, Thomas Bächler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version bump, untested by me, please sign off.
Dunno who all uses this, but if we can't really test it after a few
days, you can consider me signed off, just to get things moving.
On 8/30/08, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One important thing to note is that it apparently can't build shared
> anymore. I do now know if this breaks anything (libshadow)... if it
> does I will try to hack on it and get it to work, but actually I'm a
> little more comfortable with sta
I made some minor changes to shadow, and renamed some files in
addition to the version bump.
One important thing to note is that it apparently can't build shared
anymore. I do now know if this breaks anything (libshadow)... if it
does I will try to hack on it and get it to work, but actually I'm a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been told that not including the libncurses.so.5 library breaks
> "many, many, many" binary blobs so I had to re-include that in the ncurses
> package. Building on Arch will still link to the wide-characte
So I made a handful of changes to the dbscripts, and wanted to get a
quick review from people before I push them live.
If you get a chance, please look over the recent patches here:
http://projects.archlinux.org/?p=dbscripts.git;a=summary
This include's Xavier's new-and-improved check_archlinux s
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Aug 30,
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Tobias Powalowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> >> start_udev is
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >> start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
> >> update initscripts when t
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
>> update initscripts when they updated udev or something.. I can't
>> remember
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
see http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/KDE3_Rebuild
knetload
knetload is not useless. It works perfectly well not only with kde, but
with any other window manager that has a dock (for example icewm or even
gnome). It's also the only traffic applet that doesn't
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are in the repo but not the db
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
gnash-kde-0.8.3-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kiosktool-1.0-2.pkg.tar.gz
kkbswitch-1.4.3-2.pkg.tar.gz
klogic-1.63-1.p
Am Samstag 30 August 2008 18:40:19 schrieb Hugo Doria:
> Could we remove the kde3 section from
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup then?
>
> -- Hugo
I have updated that page.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
53115 Bonn
Telefon 0228 9716608
Mobil
Could we remove the kde3 section from
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup then?
-- Hugo
Hi,
I have just removed some packages from [extra] which are broken or useless due
to the switch from KDE3 to 4.
Those are:
libopensync:kdepim claims to use a development verision > 0.33; but it
didn't. And becvause no other package uses that lib I
removed it from t
Scan complete for extra (i686) at /home/ftp/extra/os/i686/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
kdelibs-4.1.1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
kqemu-1.3.0pre11-21-i686.pkg.tar.gz
The following files are in the repo but not the db
They wil
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
> update initscripts when they updated udev or something.. I can't
> remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting
> their systems
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Xavier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ahah, just as I finished writing this, I saw Eric reported exactly the
> same. So this is just a confirmation from my side.
>
The only thing in common with what Eric said is that the system booted
fine and some problems happene
2008/8/30 Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Eric Belanger
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also, /etc/start_udev refers to /sbin/udevtrigger and /sbin/udevsettle.
>> These binaries are missing in udev-126-2. If they were removed on purpose,
>> then start_udev shou
Scan complete for extra (x86_64) at /home/ftp/extra/os/x86_64/
The following files are out of date
They will be moved to /home/package-cleanup
qt-doc-4.4.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
21 matches
Mail list logo
