Hi devs,
we had a long discussion about xz/lzma support some time ago. So I finally
added xz-utils to testing and rebuild libarchive to make use of it.
If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from extra.
I don't know if anything else has to be recompiled to add suppo
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Hi devs,
>
> we had a long discussion about xz/lzma support some time ago. So I finally
> added xz-utils to testing and rebuild libarchive to make use of it.
>
> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
> extra.
>
> I d
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 14:14:48 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
> extra.
tpowa just asked me but I am not sure about it: Should cz-utils be part of the
base group? It'll be installed anyway because libarchive depends on it. O the
> we had a long discussion about xz/lzma support some time ago. So I finally
> added xz-utils to testing and rebuild libarchive to make use of it.
:: Replace lzma-utils with localtesting/xz-utils? [Y/n]
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transactio
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 14:14:48 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
>> extra.
>
> tpowa just asked me but I am not sure about it: Should cz-utils be part of the
> base group? It'
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 15:02:20 schrieb Firmicus:
> :: Replace lzma-utils with localtesting/xz-utils? [Y/n]
>
> resolving dependencies...
> looking for inter-conflicts...
> error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
>
> :: yelp: requires lzma-utils>=4.32.7
OK, I a not su
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 15:53:26 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> > :: yelp: requires lzma-utils>=4.32.7
OK, I just checked the yelp source. It seems the includes of lzma-utils and
xz-utils are different.
But on the other side yelp only needs lzma to open lzma compressed info pages.
Afaik all our man/
Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
> Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 15:53:26 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>
>>> :: yelp: requires lzma-utils>=4.32.7
>>>
>
> OK, I just checked the yelp source. It seems the includes of lzma-utils and
> xz-utils are different.
>
> But on the other side yelp only needs lzma to o
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
Hi devs,
we had a long discussion about xz/lzma support some time ago. So I finally
added xz-utils to testing and rebuild libarchive to make use of it.
If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from extra.
I don't know if anything else has to
Thomas Bächler a écrit :
> Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> we had a long discussion about xz/lzma support some time ago. So I
>> finally added xz-utils to testing and rebuild libarchive to make use
>> of it.
>> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils
>> from ext
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 22:53:34 schrieb Firmicus:
> I expected a command for xz/lzma (akin to j for
> bz2), but neither tar nor bsdtar has such a thing yet. Hopefully this
> this will be implemented soon, as the xz format is about to become
> relatively widespread.
Both, gnu tar and bsdtar suppor
Pierre Schmitz a écrit :
> Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 22:53:34 schrieb Firmicus:
>
>> I expected a command for xz/lzma (akin to j for
>> bz2), but neither tar nor bsdtar has such a thing yet. Hopefully this
>> this will be implemented soon, as the xz format is about to become
>> relatively widespre
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 23:18:17 schrieb Firmicus:
> > Both, gnu tar and bsdtar support the -J switch to compress and uncompress
> > xz archives. Did you try the recent packages from testin
But it seems that "bsdtar -cf blah.tar.xz blah" just produces an uncompressed
tar file. Shouldn't libarchive
Pierre Schmitz schrieb:
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 23:18:17 schrieb Firmicus:
Both, gnu tar and bsdtar support the -J switch to compress and uncompress
xz archives. Did you try the recent packages from testin
But it seems that "bsdtar -cf blah.tar.xz blah" just produces an uncompressed
tar file.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 23:18:17 schrieb Firmicus:
>> > Both, gnu tar and bsdtar support the -J switch to compress and uncompress
>> > xz archives. Did you try the recent packages from testin
>
> But it seems that "bsdtar -cf blah.tar.xz blah
Am Dienstag, 2. Juni 2009 11:47:37 schrieb Xavier:
> When compressing, they don't look at the extension either, and just
> default to uncompressed tar.
Yes, that seems to be right. Even though it looks inconsitent.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
53115 Bonn
Telefon 0228 97
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 16:41, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 14:14:48 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>>> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
>>> extra.
>>
>> tpowa just asked me but I am not sure abo
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 16:41, Dan McGee wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 Mai 2009 14:14:48 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
extra.
tpowa ju
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 16:57, Allan McRae wrote:
> Roman Kyrylych wrote:
>> Anyway what really bothers me is this:
>> # LANG=C pacman -Su
>> :: Starting full system upgrade...
>> :: Replace lzma-utils with testing/xz-utils? [Y/n] n
>> resolving dependencies...
>> looking for inter-conflicts...
>> :
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 09:57, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Hm, I don't really see a reason for this, can you explain the reason for
>> me?
>> Here's my logic:
>> a group should not be required to have all dependencies in a group,
>> reason: when installing a group pacman installs all packages as
>> 'expli
On Sunday 31 May 2009 14:14:48 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
> extra.
Are we ready to move this in? At least one more sign-off would be nice.
--
Pierre Schmitz
Clemens-August-Straße 76
53115 Bonn
Telefon 0228 9716608
M
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
On Sunday 31 May 2009 14:14:48 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
extra.
Are we ready to move this in? At least one more sign-off would be nice.
libarchive is working here. Signoff both.
Allan
Allan McRae a écrit :
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> On Sunday 31 May 2009 14:14:48 Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>>> If everything is OK we can move both to core and remove lzma-utils from
>>> extra.
>>>
>>
>> Are we ready to move this in? At least one more sign-off would be nice.
>>
>
> libarchi
23 matches
Mail list logo
