On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
Firstly:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Damjan Georgievski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And,
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
start_udev is still there because people
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
I hope I can make the changes to load-modules.sh soon to make
blacklisting work in a reasonable way. See
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
I hope I can make the changes to
2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
I
Am Donnerstag 04 September 2008 schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
I hope I can make the changes to load-modules.sh soon to
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Dusty Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/9/4 Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Thomas Bächler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron Griffin schrieb:
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this explaination a little better than our rules are stock
too, but I'm still undecided. I'd be interested in hearing some other
opinions here... Dan, you usually have good input... opinion?
Without completely
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Dan McGee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like this explaination a little better than our rules are stock
too, but I'm still undecided. I'd be interested in hearing some other
opinions here...
Some followups here. tpowa went ahead and handled a few of the changes
I was discussing here, but there are a few more before I push this to
testing.
Firstly:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Damjan Georgievski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, 51-arch.rules is being installed in /etc/udev/rules.d.
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Tobias Powalowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I am not even sure this is a problem with udev or if I did
something wrong, but the auto-mount feature of gnome apparently
stopped working after this upgrade.
But the system boot fines, the external usb disk is still
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Xavier:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I am not even sure this is a problem with udev or if I did
something wrong, but the auto-mount feature of gnome apparently
stopped working after this upgrade.
But the system
Am Samstag 30 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried udev-126-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz. My machine still booted fine. The
only problem that I noticed is that the /dev/sg0 device that it creates
for my external USB
2008/8/30 Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, /etc/start_udev refers to /sbin/udevtrigger and /sbin/udevsettle.
These binaries are missing in udev-126-2. If they were removed on purpose,
then start_udev should be
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahah, just as I finished writing this, I saw Eric reported exactly the
same. So this is just a confirmation from my side.
The only thing in common with what Eric said is that the system booted
fine and some problems happened
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
update initscripts when they updated udev or something.. I can't
remember the issue, but it was people being foolish and expecting
their systems to
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
update initscripts when they updated udev or something.. I can't
remember the issue,
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
start_udev is still there because people were jackasses and didn't
update initscripts when they updated
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Tobias Powalowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
start_udev is still there
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Tobias Powalowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 4:28 AM, Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 1:45
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a bump here. I'd like to throw this in testing if someone else
can verify I didn't make machines unbootable. When this hit's testing,
it will require a rebuild of packages which contain udev rules (move
from
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried udev-126-2-i686.pkg.tar.gz. My machine still booted fine. The only
problem that I noticed is that the /dev/sg0 device that it creates for my
external USB DVD/CD-RW doesn't have the write permission for the optical
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Eric Belanger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, /etc/start_udev refers to /sbin/udevtrigger and /sbin/udevsettle.
These binaries are missing in udev-126-2. If they were removed on purpose,
then start_udev should be updated.
start_udev is still there because people
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My !pcspkr entry in the MODULES array of /etc/rc.conf was ignored.
Looks like modprobe is still called directly in
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules I will fix that. It should call
load-modules. Fixing and re-uploading.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My !pcspkr entry in the MODULES array of /etc/rc.conf was ignored.
Looks like modprobe is still called directly in
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules I will fix that. It should call
load-modules. Fixing and re-uploading.
Am Donnerstag 28 August 2008 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My !pcspkr entry in the MODULES array of /etc/rc.conf was ignored.
Looks like modprobe is still called directly in
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules I will fix that. It
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Allan McRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My !pcspkr entry in the MODULES array of /etc/rc.conf was ignored.
Looks like modprobe is still called directly in
/lib/udev/rules.d/80-drivers.rules I will fix that. It should call
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life has given me a lack of time for anything serious in
Arch-land.
Anyway, I've rebuilt udev 126 (we're on 119, eek!) and made what
changes I
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:24 AM, James Rayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Aaron Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life has given me a lack of time for anything serious in
Arch-land.
Anyway,
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life has given me a lack of time for anything serious in
Arch-land.
Anyway, I've rebuilt udev 126 (we're on 119, eek!) and made what
changes I thought ideal. I would love to stick with strictly vanilla
rules, but some of
Aaron Griffin wrote:
So I've let udev stagnate for a while, mostly because I'm a fool and
real life has given me a lack of time for anything serious in
Arch-land.
Anyway, I've rebuilt udev 126 (we're on 119, eek!) and made what
changes I thought ideal. I would love to stick with strictly
36 matches
Mail list logo
