On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> I have now removed most packages that have less that 1% usage and no
> maintainer from the repos, the exceptions being pacbuild and libnids
> (required by something in community). They are now moving to the AUR, but
> some may take slightly lo
I have now removed most packages that have less that 1% usage and no
maintainer from the repos, the exceptions being pacbuild and libnids
(required by something in community). They are now moving to the AUR,
but some may take slightly longer to get uploaded due to their PKGBUILDs
not being upd
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:12, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>>
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 12:11:39 schrieb Allan McRae:
Do you have some kind of script to upload those
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:12, Allan McRae wrote:
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 12:11:39 schrieb Allan McRae:
Do you have some kind of script to upload those to the AUR? Otherwise you
could just remove them; they are still in the svn repo an
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 08:12, Allan McRae wrote:
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 12:11:39 schrieb Allan McRae:
>>
>> Do you have some kind of script to upload those to the AUR? Otherwise you
>> could just remove them; they are still in the svn repo anyway.
>>
>
> I wa
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 12:11:39 schrieb Allan McRae:
Apart from this, does anyone have objections to me moving any of the
other packages in this list to the AUR over the next few weeks?
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats#Orph
a
Am Donnerstag 18 Dezember 2008 12:11:39 schrieb Allan McRae:
> Apart from this, does anyone have objections to me moving any of the
> other packages in this list to the AUR over the next few weeks?
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats#Orph
>aned_packages
Do you
Jason Chu wrote:
Hehehe... umm... I've used it, maintained it, and hacked on it. I
started the damned project. I've also not picked it up for quite some
time. No time these days. Plus I do less packaging myself.
The git repo is still hosted on project.archlinux.org but the package
itself is
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Giovanni Scafora
> wrote:
>> 2008/12/15, Tom K :
>>> pacbuild is an official Arch project - is the AUR the right place for it?
>>
>> imho pacbuild should be in extra.
>
> Has anyone on the dev team used it? Or
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 5:09 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Giovanni Scafora
> wrote:
>> 2008/12/15, Tom K :
>>> pacbuild is an official Arch project - is the AUR the right place for it?
>>
>> imho pacbuild should be in extra.
>
> Has anyone on the dev team used it? Or
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:38 AM, Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2008/12/15, Tom K :
>> pacbuild is an official Arch project - is the AUR the right place for it?
>
> imho pacbuild should be in extra.
Has anyone on the dev team used it? Or maintained it or hacked on it?
I think we can hold it in a slig
2008/12/15, Tom K :
> pacbuild is an official Arch project - is the AUR the right place for it?
imho pacbuild should be in extra.
--
Arch Linux Developer (voidnull)
AUR & Pacman Italian Translations
Microdia Developer
http://www.archlinux.it
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi,
I have sorted all packages with <1% usage into those that need kept,
and the remaining into those with maintainers and those that are
orphans. See
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats .
There are 142 packages that have <1% usage, are
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 14 Dezember 2008 12:03:46 schrieb Allan McRae:
I have sorted all packages with <1% usage into those that need kept, and
the remaining into those with maintainers and those that are orphans.
See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pk
Am Sonntag 14 Dezember 2008 12:03:46 schrieb Allan McRae:
> I have sorted all packages with <1% usage into those that need kept, and
> the remaining into those with maintainers and those that are orphans.
> See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats
> .
Ar you usi
Am Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:03:46 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae :
> Hi,
>
> I have sorted all packages with <1% usage into those that need kept,
> and the remaining into those with maintainers and those that are
> orphans. See
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats .
>
>
Hi,
I have sorted all packages with <1% usage into those that need kept, and
the remaining into those with maintainers and those that are orphans.
See http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats .
There are 142 packages that have <1% usage, are orphans and are not
So does anybody know where this exactly got up to?
There is these two wiki pages which appear partially (or possibly fully)
merged:
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Allan/Extra_Repo_and_Pkgstats
Tomorrow I intend to go throug
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Firmicus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan McGee a écrit :
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Firmicus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> <...>
>>>
>>> The page Package_Cleanup is now redirected to
>>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Clea
Dan McGee a écrit :
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Firmicus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<...>
The page Package_Cleanup is now redirected to
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup
I have moved the content of the former to the latter and reorganized it a
bit.
I also
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Firmicus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Allan McRae a écrit :
>>
>> Firmicus wrote:
>>>
>>> Allan McRae a écrit :
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have
Allan McRae a écrit :
Firmicus wrote:
Allan McRae a écrit :
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or
otherwise needed (in pa
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:54 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firmicus wrote:
>> But don't forget that we also have those two wiki pages:
>>
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Package_Cleanup
>>
>> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Repo_Cleanup
>>
>> I think it would
Firmicus wrote:
Allan McRae a écrit :
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or
otherwise needed (in pacman testsuite, using o
Allan McRae a écrit :
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwise
needed (in pacman testsuite, using on gerolde). See
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo based
> on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and flagged for
> keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwis
Allan McRae wrote:
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwise
needed (in pacman testsuite, using on gerolde). See the
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:16:40 +1000
Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
> based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
> flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or
> o
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or
otherwise needed (in p
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Allan McRae wrote:
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo based on
<1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and flagged for
keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwise needed (in pacman
testsuite, using
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo based
> on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and flagged for
> keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwise needed (in
Hi devs,
I have created a table of candidates for removal from the extra repo
based on <1% usage in the pkgstats results. I have gone through and
flagged for keeping packages which are i18n, makedepends, or otherwise
needed (in pacman testsuite, using on gerolde). See the list here:
http://
32 matches
Mail list logo
