On 12 November 2011 08:04, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 01:59 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>>> On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>
On 11/12/2011 01:59 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:56 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
> So far the only solution is to download
On 11/12/2011 01:43 AM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
locally using gpg --det
On 12 November 2011 07:35, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
>>> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
>>> b
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
>> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
>> back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
>
>
On 31 October 2011 02:06, Florian Pritz wrote:
> So far the only solution is to download the finished package, sign it
> locally using gpg --detach-sign and then uploading the signature
> back to pkgbuild.com so commitpkg will find it.
Did something change WRT this workflow now? I'm getting
sign
On 31/10/11 06:09, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:06:21 +0100
Florian Pritz wrote:
On 30.10.2011 18:56, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
I'm building my packages exclusive on pkgbuild.com and there I can't
sign packages. If we do the switch in dbscripts then pkgbuild.com
should be ready
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:06:21 +0100
Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 30.10.2011 18:56, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> > I'm building my packages exclusive on pkgbuild.com and there I can't
> > sign packages. If we do the switch in dbscripts then pkgbuild.com
> > should be ready to generate signed packages. As
On 30.10.2011 18:56, Daniel Isenmann wrote:
> I'm building my packages exclusive on pkgbuild.com and there I can't
> sign packages. If we do the switch in dbscripts then pkgbuild.com
> should be ready to generate signed packages. As far as I know it isn't
> possible yet, am I right?
So far the onl
10 matches
Mail list logo