[arch-general] GTK applications can not remember their last position

2008-06-10 Thread Lyman
Hi, all It is a little weird that all my GTK applications (eg, pidgin pcmanx) can not remember their last position today. Instead, they all appear at top-left corner. I've no idea what could be wrong. Any ideas? lyman

Re: [arch-general] GTK applications can not remember their last position

2008-06-10 Thread Chris Bolton
if you go to that bug page, and follow the link to the upstream bug report, apparently there's a patch that fixed. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to apply that patch. can someone provide instructions? thanks.

Re: [arch-general] GTK applications can not remember their last position

2008-06-10 Thread Dennis Herbrich
On Tue, June 10, 2008 10:32, Chris Bolton wrote: if you go to that bug page, and follow the link to the upstream bug report, apparently there's a patch that fixed. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to apply that patch. can someone provide instructions? thanks. I uploaded a PKGBUILD integrating

[arch-general] Can we use the Firefox name?

2008-06-10 Thread Alessio Bolognino
There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package firefox ? If you ask it to me, I think we can not: Mike Connor (a Mozilla guy :) said

Re: [arch-general] Can we use the Firefox name?

2008-06-10 Thread Alessio Bolognino
On Wed 2008-06-11 05:46, Alessio 'mOLOk' Bolognino wrote: There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package firefox ? If you ask it to

Re: [arch-general] Can we use the Firefox name?

2008-06-10 Thread Dan McGee
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a thing that I have never understood: we ship the Firefox package not branded, for the well known issues with the licensing of the artwork, and that's fine; but are we sure we can name that package firefox ?

Re: [arch-general] Can we use the Firefox name?

2008-06-10 Thread Alessio Bolognino
On Tue 2008-06-10 22:52, Dan McGee wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Alessio Bolognino [...] Sure we name our package firefox- after the binary named firefox contained within. When they fix their build process to name the unbranded binary differently, perhaps we can adjust our