Re: [arch-general] libreadline.so issues

2009-07-13 Thread Samuel Baldwin
Yup! Works great, thank you! -- Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel

Re: [arch-general] libreadline.so issues

2009-07-13 Thread David Rosenstrauch
Samuel Baldwin wrote: -s), but now when I boot I get errors when it tries to enter runlevel 3 (I haven't played with any runlevel stuff): /bin/bash: error while loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory INIT: Entering runlvel: 3 /bin/ba

[arch-general] libreadline.so issues

2009-07-13 Thread Samuel Baldwin
The other day I tried to install K3B on my x86_64 laptop, and midway through it I got some errors, so I ran pacman -Sy k3b and it got about midway through before I started getting error messages about the computer not being able to find libreadline.so. I use zsh as my shell for my normal user, but

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] iwlwifi-4965-ucode 228.61.2.24-1

2009-07-13 Thread Henning Garus
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:00:00AM +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > New upstream release, please test and sign off. I also remove the ABI > version 1 ucode, which should not be needed anymore with recent kernels. I can still connect to my router using wpa and netcfg.

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Caleb Cushing
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Zé Ninguém wrote: > Neither was the previous vi, and the package was named vi. > I think there needs to exist a binary named vi in the system, for > POSIX compliance, but I am not shure. > So if there needs to be a package that provides it, there can't be several >

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Dieter Plaetinck
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:46:50 +0200 Stefan Husmann wrote: > David C. Rankin schrieb: > > Listmates, > > > > One are where I can use help is vi configuration. With the > > latest updates to vi and I guess readline, vi behaves very > > differently than it did just before the update. Specificall

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Stefan Husmann
David C. Rankin schrieb: Listmates, One are where I can use help is vi configuration. With the latest updates to vi and I guess readline, vi behaves very differently than it did just before the update. Specifically, the screen flashes white/black when the cursor is in column 1 if a le

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread hollunder
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:32:45 +0100 Zé Ninguém wrote: > 2009/7/13 Magnus Therning > > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs wrote: > > > On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > > >> to the dev: > > >> why not rename vi package to nvi ? > > > > > > +1 to that > > > > Sounds

Re: [arch-general] SIGSEGV in getopt, libc-problem?

2009-07-13 Thread clemens fischer
On Tue-2009/07/07-22:17 clemens fischer wrote: > (gdb) bt > incomplete CFI data; unspecified registers (e.g., eax) at 0xb7fa838a...#0 > 0xb7fa84dc in _getopt_internal_r () > from /lib/libc.so.6 > #1 0xb7fa946e in _getopt_internal () from /lib/libc.so.6 > #2 0xb7fa96b9 in getopt_long ()

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 05:32, Magnus Therning wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs wrote: >> On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: >>> to the dev: >>> why not rename vi package to nvi ? >> >> +1 to that > > Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in t

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Zé Ninguém
2009/7/13 Magnus Therning > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs wrote: > > On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > >> to the dev: > >> why not rename vi package to nvi ? > > > > +1 to that > > Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in the strictest > sense.

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Ed Jobs wrote: > On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: >> to the dev: >> why not rename vi package to nvi ? > > +1 to that Sounds like a good idea, especially since nvi _isn't_ vi in the strictest sense. /M -- Magnus Therning

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Ed Jobs
On Monday 13 July 2009 11:49, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote: > to the dev: > why not rename vi package to nvi ? +1 to that -- If we could implement a physical system with the storage capacity that matches the 128-bit address range of ZFS, that we would "literally evaporate all the oceans on earth". [

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread solsTiCe d'Hiver
i think you're using [testing] and then use vi-1.79 which is nvi. and not the vi you know which was a stripped down version of vim nvi behave like the original vi and not like vim. i think there's nothing you can do about this to the dev: why not rename vi package to nvi ?

Re: [arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread Magnus Therning
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:00 AM, David C. Rankin wrote: > Listmates, > >        One are where I can use help is vi configuration. With the latest > updates to vi and I guess readline, vi behaves very differently than it did > just before the update. Specifically, the screen flashes white/black wh

[arch-general] reconfiguring vi to work like it did before the last update?

2009-07-13 Thread David C. Rankin
Listmates, One are where I can use help is vi configuration. With the latest updates to vi and I guess readline, vi behaves very differently than it did just before the update. Specifically, the screen flashes white/black when the cursor is in column 1 if a left cursor is pressed or if