Wow, who can find my spelling mistakes ... can keep them. It's a bargain
tonight ...
-T
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for lacking the announcement ... but I guess that's why it is
> still in testing. The vimcurrent symlink was modelled after debi
Hi guys,
sorry for lacking the announcement ... but I guess that's why it is
still in testing. The vimcurrent symlink was modelled after debian's
behaviour. Turns out that's a necessary as a third tit. Vim actually
automatically akak out of the box checks /usr/share/vim/vimfiles as part
of
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 22:27, Daniel J Griffiths wrote:
> what was that?
>
My laziness. I'd like such a script. I'll throw it in pkgtools :P
On Jul 20, 2009 at 01:46 AM, b4283 wrote:
> there should be a
> /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent => vim72
> which is missing from the pack ?
Thanks for that =)
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 19:48, Daniel J Griffiths wrote:
If all you want to do is monitor what packages
you maintain that are actually /marked/ out of date, that's simple.. I could
throw together a shell script for that in a few seconds (let me know if you
think I should)
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 19:48, Daniel J Griffiths wrote:
> If all you want to do is monitor what packages
> you maintain that are actually /marked/ out of date, that's simple.. I could
> throw together a shell script for that in a few seconds (let me know if you
> think I should).
>
Patch against p
Pierre Chapuis wrote:
Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:07:15 -0400,
Daniel J Griffiths a écrit :
I'm working on a script for arch that does this.
I'm working on something like that too, to help me monitor my AUR packages. I
haven't done anything much yet though, and I have begun to write i
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 18:44, Pierre Chapuis wrote:
> Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:07:15 -0400,
> Daniel J Griffiths a écrit :
>
>> I'm working on a script for arch that does this.
>
> I'm working on something like that too, to help me monitor my AUR packages. I
> haven't done anything much yet though
Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:07:15 -0400,
Daniel J Griffiths a écrit :
> I'm working on a script for arch that does this.
I'm working on something like that too, to help me monitor my AUR packages. I
haven't done anything much yet though, and I have begun to write it in Lua
which is probably a ba
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Loui Chang wrote:
> On Mon 20 Jul 2009 17:40 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:18, Aaron Griffin wrote:
>> > Guess who it is?
>> > http://oswatershed.org/
>> >
>>
>> Do they have rss feeds? Where are they getting the list of "upstream
>> rele
Loui Chang wrote:
On Mon 20 Jul 2009 17:40 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:18, Aaron Griffin wrote:
Guess who it is?
http://oswatershed.org/
Do they have rss feeds? Where are they getting the list of "upstream
releases"? Can it be customized? This could r
On Mon 20 Jul 2009 17:40 -0400, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:18, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > Guess who it is?
> > http://oswatershed.org/
> >
>
> Do they have rss feeds? Where are they getting the list of "upstream
> releases"? Can it be customized? This could really be handy for
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 16:18, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> Guess who it is?
> http://oswatershed.org/
>
Do they have rss feeds? Where are they getting the list of "upstream
releases"? Can it be customized? This could really be handy for
arch-games...
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 11:18:24 am Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 July 2009 15:43:58 Thomas Bächler wrote:
> > Solve it by editing
> > /usr/share/config/kdm/kdmrc and adding TerminateServer=true to a
> > [X-*-Core] section, then restart kdm.
>
> Maybe we should add this by default?
>
>
Tim Gelter wrote:
> Octavian Florea wrote:
>> Tim Gelter wrote:
>>> I appreciate the offer, but it'd be easy enough to do something like:
>>> alias firefox="killall firefox && firefox"
>>> What I'm looking for is an answer to why Firefox has this issue on arch,
>>> but not on other mainstream distr
On Sunday 19 July 2009 06:30:45 pm Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> 2009/7/19, David C. Rankin :
> > For anyone else caught with the same problem. I wrote a small
> > script that reinstalls vim and moves vi to vi.vni. The script is nothing
> > more that what you would simply do by hand, it just
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:27:20 -0400
Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Daniel
> Isenmann wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:08:21 +0200
> > Thomas Bächler wrote:
> >
> >> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> >> > Please signoff both architectures. The new version fixes
> >> > CVE-2009-0
On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:10:06 +0200
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Daniel Isenmann schrieb:
> >>> Yes I have removed. I have asked before on the dev-public but
> >>> nobody answered. I will release a new pkgrel with added patch
> >>> soon.
> >>>
> >>> Any other things about the patches I should know?
> >
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream update.
>
> Signoff both arches.
>
User signoff, x86_64. lsusb acts as expected.
Thanks.
--
---
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
---
Ogden Nash - "The trouble w
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Upstream update. Fixes FS#15217.
>
> Sign-off both arches.
>
User signoff, x86_64. Logged in fine.
Thanks.
--
---
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
---
Joan Crawford - "
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Bump upstream patch level, moved static libraries to /usr/lib
>
> Signoff both arches.
>
User signoff, x86_64. Bash works fine.
Thanks
--
---
Denis A. Altoe Falqueto
---
Octavian Florea wrote:
> Tim Gelter wrote:
>> I appreciate the offer, but it'd be easy enough to do something like:
>> alias firefox="killall firefox && firefox"
>> What I'm looking for is an answer to why Firefox has this issue on arch,
>> but not on other mainstream distros. Or am I really the on
Allan McRae wrote:
And given the number of complaints I got about libjpeg7 (wheres
the thanks now gtk and kde are working?)
Thank you!
:-)
DR
Tim Gelter wrote:
I appreciate the offer, but it'd be easy enough to do something like:
alias firefox="killall firefox && firefox"
What I'm looking for is an answer to why Firefox has this issue on arch,
but not on other mainstream distros. Or am I really the only user
experiencing this issue? (o
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 11:18:38 -0400 2009:
>> Andrei Thorp wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 10:48:54 -0400 2009:
Damien Churchill wrote:
> 2009/7/20 Dario :
>> Hi!
>>
>> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06
Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 11:18:38 -0400 2009:
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 10:48:54 -0400 2009:
> >> Damien Churchill wrote:
> >>> 2009/7/20 Dario :
> Hi!
>
> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha s
On Monday 20 July 2009 17:18:38 Tim Gelter wrote:
> Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 10:48:54 -0400 2009:
> >> Damien Churchill wrote:
> >>> 2009/7/20 Dario :
> Hi!
>
> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
> > "Fir
Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 10:48:54 -0400 2009:
>> Damien Churchill wrote:
>>> 2009/7/20 Dario :
Hi!
In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
> "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
Excerpts from Tim Gelter's message of Mon Jul 20 10:48:54 -0400 2009:
> Damien Churchill wrote:
> > 2009/7/20 Dario :
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
> >>> "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
> >>> window, you must firs
Damien Churchill wrote:
> 2009/7/20 Dario :
>> Hi!
>>
>> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
>>> "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
>>> window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart
>>> your system."
>> Mmm I remember
Excerpts from Sven-Hendrik Haase's message of Mon Jul 20 09:58:43 -0400 2009:
> On 20.07.2009 15:46, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sun Jul 19 00:00:53 -0400 2009:
> >
> >> So the package is out-of-date and the new version does not build? Could
> >> be a reason
On 20.07.2009 15:46, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sun Jul 19 00:00:53 -0400 2009:
>
>> So the package is out-of-date and the new version does not build? Could
>> be a reason why it is not updated...
>>
>
> I recall Blender not having support for python 2.6
Excerpts from Allan McRae's message of Sun Jul 19 00:00:53 -0400 2009:
> So the package is out-of-date and the new version does not build? Could
> be a reason why it is not updated...
I recall Blender not having support for python 2.6 at some point (while
we had 2.6). It seems some folks have no
Hi guys,
just an upstream bump, with the latest security fix,
update is recommended for all users.
please signoff fast
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a di
Allan,
Ruby 1.9 can be supported by VIM with a patch which I sent to Tobias months
ago. I submitted to vim-devel, but without response.
If anyone want this patch (vim support to ruby 1.9) I will be happy to send.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Caină wrote:
>
>> It also la
Cainã wrote:
It also lacks ruby/python support
Ruby support is deliberate as we are switching to ruby-1.9 and vim
currently does not support it. No idea about python.
Allan
It also lacks ruby/python support.
2009/7/20 b4283 :
> Hi,
> just upgraded to testing/vim 7.2-234 today and found that the color schemes
> are missing.
> After simple investigation, it was a problem of lacking a symlink within
> vim's directory.
>
> there should be a
> /usr/share/vim/vimcurrent =>
Allan McRae wrote:
A couple of fixes have been applied to these packages since the last
signoff message. The list of packages looking for signoffs now are:
filesystem 2009.07-1
initscripts 2009.07-3
syslog-ng 3.0.3-2
udev 141-5
Cheers,
Allan
Would it be possible to have a news item, after th
Hi,
just upgraded to testing/vim 7.2-234 today and found that the color
schemes are missing.
After simple investigation, it was a problem of lacking a symlink within
vim's directory.
there should be a
/usr/share/vim/vimcurrent => vim72
which is missing from the pack ?
if anyone who is having
Thank you! This works fine!
Greetings :)
Am Jul 20, 2009 um 9:45 AM schrieb Damien Churchill:
2009/7/20 Dario :
Hi!
In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
"Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
window, you must first close the existing Fire
Andrei Thorp wrote:
Excerpts from Manne Merak's message of Fri Jul 17 05:50:25 -0400 2009:
My previous MythTV box, running opensuse 10.2, just died (HDD failure).
Replaced the HDD and installed Arch for n minimal MythTV platform; on an
old AMD Athlon 1.2G, 512Meg RAM, NVIDIA FX5200.
All ins
2009/7/20 Dario :
> Hi!
>
> In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
>> "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
>> window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart
>> your system."
>
> Mmm I remember something like this happening
Hi!
In data lunedì 20 luglio 2009 06:48:00, Tim Gelter ha scritto:
> "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new
> window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart
> your system."
Mmm I remember something like this happening on Windows (*cough*) machines
43 matches
Mail list logo
