On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
> hi ,
> What's going on ?
> The 2 mirrors I use give 404 error when trying to fetch community db .
>
Hi,
The community repo was accidentally removed from the main server. It
is currently being resynced. It will probably take several days
before all mir
hi ,
What's going on ?
The 2 mirrors I use give 404 error when trying to fetch community db .
A new distro? evil idea!!
By the way: reinvent the wheel may be an interesting
progress.
On 2009-09-17 23:10:10, nekomancer davion wrote:
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:10:10 -0400
> From: nekomancer davion
> To: General D
Hi,
It is just an idea, nothing more than it.
These days, I had think more than had done anything( a bad hehaver)
As an clumzy idea, git will help to manage the config/build script files.
And binary pkgs and source pkgs should be maintained by something else.
As an embeded engi
Forsight linux does something like this, but their server side was
closed source the last time I took a look(back in February).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conary_(package_manager)
It is a very interesting idea, and could speed things up a lot. It
would make downloading packages to install elsew
I'm using Arch on a old Sony Vaio: pentium II 200MHz with ~64MB of ram. It
is running LXDE. It is slow to boot, but I suspend without problems (its up
since a couple of month with suspend+resume each morning).
It is running slow, but this machine is now my alarm clock, and it works
perfectly stream
> My guess is either outdated library in ubuntu, which your codes works
> with, but doesn't work with a newer version, or that gcc/glibc being
> newer is making it break. It's likely one of those.
>
even if it is a bug on there end or with my code. it would be good to
figure out exactly what the i
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 17:04, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
>> The other is that I had trouble finding a truly lightweight X terminal
>> (there were times when xterm was considered bloated ;) so I packaged myself
>> rxvt. Most other distributi
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 17:04, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> The other is that I had trouble finding a truly lightweight X terminal
> (there were times when xterm was considered bloated ;) so I packaged myself
> rxvt. Most other distributions offer it so in case you decide to include it
> I attach
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 17:03, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> according to the crypto++ mailing list my code does compile with that
> command on ubuntu. if I'm doing something wrong for arch I'd like to
> know. But I'm concerned that something is not being compiled right for
> crypto++ on arch.
> --
> Ca
В Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:23:12 -0500
Aaron Griffin пишет:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh
> wrote:
> > My account has been locked because: "Your account had been locked
> > due to too many failed login attempts"
>
> What's your user account name?
UR6LAD. Now I'm logging.
T
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Vitaliy Berdinskikh wrote:
> My account has been locked because: "Your account had been locked due
> to too many failed login attempts"
What's your user account name?
My account has been locked because: "Your account had been locked due
to too many failed login attempts"
В Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:15:24 +0300
Vitaliy Berdinskikh пишет:
> Hi all!
>
> I can't login to Flyspray, just have the error message "Error #23:
> User or group not enabled for login."
>
> I'v
Hi all!
I can't login to Flyspray, just have the error message "Error #23: User
or group not enabled for login."
I've requested "Lost password retrieval" and set the new
password - the same error.
--
Sincerelly yours,
Vitaliy Berdinskikh (Виталий Бердинских)
UR6LAD
73!
xmpp:vita...@berdinskikh.
Hello list,
I just installed archlinux on a very old laptop of mine PIII at 500MHz
with 128MB RAM. I am planning on using it as a desktop... I should mention
two facts.
First is that I installed from CD succesfully without problems. I remember
in the past the installer would fail with such a
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
using namespace boost::filesystem;
string getSha1Hash(const path &file, bool uppercase)
{
string result;
CryptoPP::SHA1 hash;
CryptoPP::FileSource(file.file_string().c_str(),true,
new CryptoPP::Ha
Done
Biru Ionut wrote:
Lars Tennstedt wrote:
I guess it is not a good idea to report the bug because the package is
flagged out of date. So I will wait a bit longer.
Greetings
Lars Tennstedt
report it. the maintainer will update and fix this issue as well.
Lars Tennstedt wrote:
I guess it is not a good idea to report the bug because the package is
flagged out of date. So I will wait a bit longer.
Greetings
Lars Tennstedt
report it. the maintainer will update and fix this issue as well.
--
Ionut
I guess it is not a good idea to report the bug because the package is
flagged out of date. So I will wait a bit longer.
Greetings
Lars Tennstedt
Johannes Held wrote:
Lars Tennstedt :
I noticed that RubyRipper does not start anymore since the last ruby
update. Can anyone confirm that?
con
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 20:47:19 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> Feel free to provide a git patch. I made what changes I could see
> (Pierre or Dan, I trust you guys with the web side more than myself -
> could you make those changes live?)
Looks fine to me now; pushed the changes to gudrun (this
Lars Tennstedt :
> I noticed that RubyRipper does not start anymore since the last ruby
> update. Can anyone confirm that?
confirmed
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst dich gut.
Mast und Schotbruch mit dem http://segelsport-blog.de.
signature.asc
Description: PGP sig
Hello,
I noticed that RubyRipper does not start anymore since the last ruby
update. Can anyone confirm that?
Bye
Lars Tennstedt
Lars Tennstedt wrote:
The answer was so easy that I missed it. Thanks!
Johannes Held wrote:
hi
I updated my Arch Linux box today and pacman wanted to install a
The answer was so easy that I missed it. Thanks!
Johannes Held wrote:
hi
I updated my Arch Linux box today and pacman wanted to install an update
for ruby that conflicted with rubygems. So I removed rubygems. But what
is the reason for this conflict?
afaik new ruby 1.9 contains rubygems and ra
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:37:09 -0500
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
>> > Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> >
>> >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 1
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 11:37:09 -0500
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
> > Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> >
> >> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> >> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 200
hi
> I updated my Arch Linux box today and pacman wanted to install an update
> for ruby that conflicted with rubygems. So I removed rubygems. But what
> is the reason for this conflict?
afaik new ruby 1.9 contains rubygems and rake.
--
Gruß, Johannes
Täglich http://blog.hehejo.de und du fühlst d
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>
>> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
>> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
>> > > If someone has a chance, can you
Hello,
I updated my Arch Linux box today and pacman wanted to install an update
for ruby that conflicted with rubygems. So I removed rubygems. But what
is the reason for this conflict?
Bye,
Lars Tennstedt
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:00:48 +0200
Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> > Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > > If someone has a chance, can you release this live?
> >
> > done
>
> Well, some links are wrong;
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:52:24 schrieb Pierre Schmitz:
> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> > If someone has a chance, can you release this live?
>
> done
Well, some links are wrong; mainly all to http://archlinux.org. They should be
replaced by ftp links
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 17:47:52 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
> If someone has a chance, can you release this live?
done
--
Pierre Schmitz, http://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 7:04 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
>>> For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now
>>> http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
>> For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now
>> http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02
>> stuff
>>
>> anyone know how t
Am Donnerstag 17 September 2009 09:57:44 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
> For 2009.08 the downloads page was updated here and there. now
> http://www.archlinux.org/download/ shows the old page with the 2009.02
> stuff
>
> anyone know how this happened? (server upgrade?) can we restore the correct
>
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:06:41 +0300
> "Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Tom K wrote:
>> > Why are you using 2009.02? 2009.08 was released last month.
>> >
>> > T.
>>
>> Sorry. I'm using 2009.08.
>>
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:06:41 +0300
"Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Tom K wrote:
> > Why are you using 2009.02? 2009.08 was released last month.
> >
> > T.
>
> Sorry. I'm using 2009.08.
>
> But when I've posted on the mailing list I've looked on
> www
36 matches
Mail list logo
