On 10 February 2010 15:35, Gaurish Sharma cont...@gaurishsharma.com wrote:
maybe give the status of testers to some active arch members who use
testing (if any users are interested at all..)
+1 to the idea.
this work can be delegated to active users who have enabled [testing]
repo. a
On 10 February 2010 01:25, Damjan Georgievski gdam...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked upstream and Fedora:
either the pulseaudio package in community is outdated, or it contains a
bullshit dependency.
it's a wrong dependency (together with some other) I've already
submited a bug report.
* Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com [09.02.2010 23:46]:
Forwarding the below, for those interested. fons, you'd maybe like this?
Forwarded Message
To: linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org
Subject: [LAU] A sound decision
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:26:36 -0200
Excerpts from Uli Armbruster's message of 2010-02-10 09:28:12 +0100:
* Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com [09.02.2010 23:46]:
Forwarding the below, for those interested. fons, you'd maybe like this?
Forwarded Message
To: linux-audio-u...@lists.linuxaudio.org
Subject: [LAU]
Hello,
I have a small problem with default permissions of Automounted
Removable Devices. Whenever I mount it via KDE4.4's Auto-mounter. it
sets all files to be owned by root.
$ ls -la /media/Backup/
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Feb 10 16:07 .
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root 4096 Feb 10 17:30 ..
* hollunder hollun...@lavabit.com [10.02.2010 12:45]:
Well, there are also lots of people who have complaints about macs and
pt, but pt sure has good marketing. I doubt a networked setup such as
his would be possible with pt.
Well, I don't know if it's possible to set up a comparable networked
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 8:58 PM, Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing I know for sure, he's a fast worker!
Oh yeah! Daniel is very fast, congratulations!
--
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com
Hi,
Recently I'm facing a funny problem. pacman (and even packer) is t
slow to search -Ss (db+aur) or -Qs (db). I see a lot of HDD activity
going on. But when I run pacman-optimize, it gets fixed.
This happens at every boot. Any ideas ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Adminstrator
Thursday 28 January 2010 skrev Hussam Al-Tayeb:
I updated to udev, cryptsetup and device mapper from testing the
installed kernel 2.6.32.6 and rebooted.
Something similar, or the same thing, happened to me.
I updated my system, and then on reboot it could not find the disk /dev/sda
anymore.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently I'm facing a funny problem. pacman (and even packer) is t slow
to search -Ss (db+aur) or -Qs (db). I see a lot of HDD activity going on.
But when I run pacman-optimize, it gets fixed.
This happens
On 10/02/2010 04:49 μμ, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
Recently I'm facing a funny problem. pacman (and even packer) is t
slow to search -Ss (db+aur) or -Qs (db). I see a lot of HDD activity
going on. But when I run pacman-optimize, it gets fixed.
This happens at every boot. Any ideas ?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently I'm facing a funny problem. pacman (and even packer) is t slow
to search -Ss (db+aur) or -Qs (db). I see a lot of HDD activity going on.
But when I run pacman-optimize, it gets fixed.
This happens
Am 10.02.2010 16:00, schrieb karolina.lindqv...@kramnet.se:
I updated my system, and then on reboot it could not find the disk /dev/sda
anymore. A pity, since it hold the boot and root file systems. I have a
custom
kernel, for various reasons, but now I could not get my custom kernel, of
@all, thanks for the tip. I used ext4 for the loop's format.
But anybody knows the reason behind this ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
Excerpts from Uli Armbruster's message of 2010-02-10 13:11:50 +0100:
* hollunder hollun...@lavabit.com [10.02.2010 12:45]:
Well, there are also lots of people who have complaints about macs and
pt, but pt sure has good marketing. I doubt a networked setup such as
his would be possible with
Am 07.02.2010 12:03, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
Okay, this is it. The busybox-based mkinitcpio is entering testing now.
BACK UP YOUR OLD (WORKING) INITRAMFS (kernel26.img) FILE! Also, do NOT
use this if you have root on NFS, it is NOT IMPLEMENTED yet.
Known issues: If you use 2.6.33 and enable
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 13.01.2010 00:34, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Since I've been bitten by this, how can I know if the file I modified is
goint to be overwritten or not, *before* it actually
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
Guys that thing bit me again: During the big libpng upgrade initscripts
package got upgraded too and /etc/rc.{sysinit,shutdown} got overwritten
without notifying me. Because of special changes I've made to mount /var as
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Am 13.01.2010 00:34, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Since I've been bitten by this, how can I know
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, dave reisner wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
Guys that thing bit me again: During the big libpng upgrade initscripts
package got upgraded too and /etc/rc.{sysinit,shutdown} got overwritten
without notifying me. Because of
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org
wrote:
Am 13.01.2010 00:34, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Since
On 11 February 2010 05:03, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net
wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Bächler
Am 10.02.2010 21:30, schrieb Dimitrios Apostolou:
Guys that thing bit me again: During the big libpng upgrade
initscripts package got upgraded too and /etc/rc.{sysinit,shutdown}
got overwritten without notifying me. Because of special changes I've
made to mount /var as tmpfs, and because I
Am 10.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Thomas Bächler:
I am still looking for someone to implement NFS root with this, please
contact me if you are interested. This will not be the final version,
there is still some work to do, but for now this requires more testing.
Okay, version 0.5.99.5 is up. This
Listmates,
After full update to kde44 and all packages from
testing/community-testing, virtualbox is working again. Cool! So far so good.
Thanks for the quick work getting all the packages together. All anyone with
the other distros sees is the little notice at kde.org KDE 4.4 Has
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 12:39 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
@all, thanks for the tip. I used ext4 for the loop's format.
But anybody knows the reason behind this ?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
Site Server Adminstrator
www.itech7.com
Can I mount /var/lib/pacman/sync as tmpfs
On 02/06/2010 09:57 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
On 06/02/2010 01:58 μμ, richard terry wrote:
Hi List/Evangelos:
This is a really useful utility, I'd like to use it to join documents.
It dosn't seem to be built against a 'patched version' of qt whatever
that may
mean.:
This version of
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert
to vers 2 but why is the newer vers slow, laggy,
semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch
values to cause it to work quicker?
alternatively,
what is your favoured mail news client for POP3, IMAP,
On 02/11/2010 11:54 AM, andrew james wrote:
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2 but
why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to cause
it to work quicker?
alternatively,
what is your
On 11/02/10 16:54, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 02/11/2010 11:54 AM, andrew james wrote:
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2 but
why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to cause
it to work
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:24:08 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On 02/11/2010 11:54 AM, andrew james wrote:
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers
2 but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:24:30AM -0500, andrew james wrote:
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2
but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to
cause it to work quicker?
On 02/10/2010 11:24 PM, andrew james wrote:
i think I am soon tired of thunderbird 3.. I could revert to vers 2
but why is the newer vers slow, laggy, semi-stallish?
has anyone else a funky thunderbird vers 3? any switch values to
cause it to work quicker?
alternatively,
what is your
33 matches
Mail list logo
