Hi,
has anyone succeeded in having /boot on a lvm volume, or a mdadm raid device,
which grub2 can directly boot from it?
If yes please give me some advice how to do it, i want to add full grub2
support to archboot setup and the docs are quite messy. I haven't found a way
to do such a setup.
Ma
On 03/10/2010 12:11 AM, David C. Rankin wrote:
There has been a really good upside to the kde4 fiasco. I never would have
learned about all the really good desktop choices out there.
That is a useful side effect! Anything that makes you learn something
can't be a bad thing! :-)
Things wou
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:53:01 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I'm finishing the mail server setup and I've run into a
> problem with dovecot. It looks like one part of dovecot doesn't match
> the other??? Here is what everything log says:
>
> Mar 9 22:48:37 nirvana dovecot: ima
On 03/09/2010 10:43 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
> Don't get me wrong, I was a bit sad to give up on KDE. (And went
> through a good bit of pain and irritation for a few days while I tried
> to suss out which desktop to switch to.) But I've got work to get done,
> and I need a stable system in
Guys,
I'm finishing the mail server setup and I've run into a problem with
dovecot.
It looks like one part of dovecot doesn't match the other??? Here is what
everything log says:
Mar 9 22:48:37 nirvana dovecot: imap-login: Fatal: Dovecot version mismatch:
Master is v1.2.10, login is v1.
On 03/09/2010 10:48 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Thanks Allan, Dave, Isaac& Ty
I'll pester the guys at kdemod. I keep pushing for KDE to embrace the
concept
of "KDE Classic". We see how smart the Coke board was when it tried to replace
Coke with "New Coke". In less than two weeks the boa
On 03/09/2010 05:02 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 10/03/10 08:58, David C. Rankin wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3 which
>> fails due to
>> kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How do we handle this? Do
>> we just
>> remove poppler-qt3? Wo
On 03/08/2010 11:18 PM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) wrote:
On 03/08/10 at 08:09pm, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
Hello all, my free time is over to stay in the bugtracker in this year.
In few days, I will start a new caeer "math p
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 03:44:17 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> typo
sorry for spam guys.
From a9545a8d51f7f236aa2b18f70aaad8f997751ea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Scarpino
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:42:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix permissions of incoming packages
---
db-update |2 ++
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 03:42:51 Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> It's ok. I forwarded the output too.
typo
From a9545a8d51f7f236aa2b18f70aaad8f997751ea9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Scarpino
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:42:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix permissions of incoming packages
---
db-
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 03:10:39 Dan McGee wrote:
> Seems sane; but maybe do the chmod before copying it into that
> directory rather than after? That way files never set foot in there
> with the wrong permissions (even if only for almost zero time).
It's ok. I forwarded the output too.
From a9
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 02:15:32 Dan McGee wrote:
>> Inline them; that way they can be reviewed.
>>
>> -Dan
> From 7a5c0584a3ad2fcf14659f5028534887bf929cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andrea Scarpino
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:01:5
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 02:15:32 Dan McGee wrote:
> Inline them; that way they can be reviewed.
>
> -Dan
From 7a5c0584a3ad2fcf14659f5028534887bf929cf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrea Scarpino
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:01:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] fix permissions of incoming packages
---
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 02:12:21 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Where is your patch?
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-
public/attachments/20100310/8c2b8a26/attachment.bin
--
Andrea
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2010 01:12:22 Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> I doubt that running find is needed, just run chmod directly on the
>> files being uploaded by commitpkg, or have repo-add chmod the
>> individual files (it's running as root right?
Il 10/03/2010 02:04, Andrea Scarpino ha scritto:
my patch attached.
Where is your patch?
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On Wednesday 10 March 2010 01:12:22 Daenyth Blank wrote:
> I doubt that running find is needed, just run chmod directly on the
> files being uploaded by commitpkg, or have repo-add chmod the
> individual files (it's running as root right?)
I also think we should fix only the package that we add in
David C. Rankin wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:49 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
[putolin]
The only viable solution I could think of is using one git repository
per package - and that is just crazy.
If it ain't broke. don't fix it!
If it ain't broke...don't break it!
I doubt that running find is needed, just run chmod directly on the
files being uploaded by commitpkg, or have repo-add chmod the
individual files (it's running as root right?)
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 18:48, Chris Brannon wrote:
> This patch changes the permissions of uploaded packages to 664, bef
This patch changes the permissions of uploaded packages to 664, before
they are moved from the staging directory. The commitpkg script included
in devtools uses rsync to upload packages, and rsync preserves permissions.
This causes problems whenever permissions are too restrictive on the
uploader'
Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
*SNIP*
>> ok. so he has umask 077 and because we are using rsync the permission is
>> persistent. maybe we should fix dbscripts and install the package with the
>> right permission.
>
> Patches welcome. :)
>
> -Dan
Hi,
I'm the o
DR, list:
I stumbled across another neat dark theme for firefox that I thought I would
pass along to the group. The following is the download URL:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/downloads/file/82476/just_black__a_cylence_theme_for_firefox_3.6_-1.1.0-fx.jar?src=search&confirmed
As
On 03/09/10 18:03, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
poppler-qt3 doesn't even seem to exist in any of the repos anymore. And
KDE3 is pretty much a dead project at this point anyway. (I don't even
think it's possible to build it on Arch anymore.) Probably best if you
don't rely on it for anything.
insta
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:58:18 -0600
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3
> which fails due to kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How
> do we handle this? Do we just remove poppler-qt3? Won't that break
> kpdf? Thought I
On 3/9/10, Guus Snijders wrote:
> On 07-03-10 21:57, Javier Vasquez wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today's pacman -Syu installed new xorg-server package:
>>
>> % pacman -Qs xorg-server
>> local/xorg-server 1.7.5.901-1 (xorg)
>> X.Org X servers
>
> For the record, this problem is fixed in 1.7.5.901-2.
>
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 17:23:49 -0500
Carlos Mennens wrote:
> Is it a bad idea to install nVidia display drivers manually by
> downloading them from nvidia.com and installing it by hand...or should
> I use 'Pacman'? I read that I could mess up my system by manually
> installing packages and should al
On 03/09/2010 05:58 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3 which
fails due to
kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How do we handle this? Do we just
remove poppler-qt3? Won't that break kpdf? Thought I would check before I
s
On 10/03/10 08:58, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3 which
fails due to
kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How do we handle this? Do we just
remove poppler-qt3? Won't that break kpdf? Thought I would check before I
starte
Guys,
Latest updates to poppler require the removal of poppler-qt3 which
fails due to
kdemod3-kdegraphics-pdf (kpdf) dependencies. How do we handle this? Do we just
remove poppler-qt3? Won't that break kpdf? Thought I would check before I
started breaking things on my own :p
The
On 03/09/2010 05:23 PM, Carlos Mennens wrote:
Is it a bad idea to install nVidia display drivers manually by
downloading them from nvidia.com and installing it by hand...or should
I use 'Pacman'? I read that I could mess up my system by manually
installing packages and should always use Pacman.
Is it a bad idea to install nVidia display drivers manually by
downloading them from nvidia.com and installing it by hand...or should
I use 'Pacman'? I read that I could mess up my system by manually
installing packages and should always use Pacman.
Thoughts / Suggestions?
-Carlos
--
Sent from
At the moment I'm developing http://bitbucket.org/aseba/tnt/ with a
friend. Is a simple twitter client for for using in console, we have a
normal client and an urwid one. There's no intention to have an X
client at the moment, but everyone is free to contribute.
--
Sebastián M. Alvarez
Website: ht
On 03/07/2010 07:49 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>
> This comes up every month at least (not necessarily on the mailing list,
> but somewhere) and people always say "use git" without even thinking how
> that would work - so far, nobody has ever presented a workflow that
> would match our packaging re
Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> Hi,
> Does anyone know a good twitter client for KDE apart from Firefox's
> echofon, Chromed Bird (I don't use GChrome), and KDE μblog ?
> Twitgin sucks if you have to many tweets from people you're following and
> that's my case.
>
I really like Qwit (available in AU
On 07-03-10 21:57, Javier Vasquez wrote:
Hi,
Today's pacman -Syu installed new xorg-server package:
% pacman -Qs xorg-server
local/xorg-server 1.7.5.901-1 (xorg)
X.Org X servers
For the record, this problem is fixed in 1.7.5.901-2.
Bugreport is here: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18598
On 03/09/2010 06:44 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 03/09/2010 06:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 03/09/2010 04:00 AM, Manne Merak wrote:
On 03/09/2010 10:31 AM, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
2010/3/9 Manne Merak:
Hi Manne,
I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
Did check out the bug rep
Il 09/03/2010 11:23, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Fixed in git:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=d85421ec
Well, then do we should expect a new release of pacman?
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On 03/09/2010 06:39 PM, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
On 03/09/2010 04:00 AM, Manne Merak wrote:
On 03/09/2010 10:31 AM, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
2010/3/9 Manne Merak:
Hi Manne,
I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
Did check out the bug reports at Arch and EncFS and after downgradin
On 03/09/2010 04:00 AM, Manne Merak wrote:
On 03/09/2010 10:31 AM, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
2010/3/9 Manne Merak:
Hi Manne,
I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
Did check out the bug reports at Arch and EncFS and after downgrading
Boost
to 1.41 I now do not get the config file re
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:04:50 -0600
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
>
>> I agree with everyone else that's said it. This comes up often enough
>> but no one ever has a good workflow that works. I have seen nothing
>> proposed in this thread that is g
On 09.03.2010 15:25, Dan McGee wrote:
> We're bandwidth and rsync-slot constrained, not "slow at
> distribution". It seems like this solution is not solving a problem we
> currently have...
>
Actually that's being solved by multi tier mirroring and the more tiers
there are the slower the whole pro
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Florian Pritz wrote:
> On 09.03.2010 14:37, Ionut Biru wrote:
>> On 03/09/2010 03:17 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
>>> On 09.03.2010 02:20, keenerd wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee wrote
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd wrote:
On 03/09/2010 03:17 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
On 09.03.2010 02:20, keenerd wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee wrote
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd wrote:
There does not seem to be a documented "standard rsync" command for
the mirrors to use, so I'm making all sorts of
On 09.03.2010 02:20, keenerd wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee wrote
>> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd wrote:
>> > There does not seem to be a documented "standard rsync" command for
>> > the mirrors to use, so I'm making all sorts of wild assumptions about
>> > what
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 13:19:58 Giovanni Scafora wrote:
> Well, what about moving testing/namcap to extra?
ok, for me.
--
Andrea
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:04:50 -0600
Aaron Griffin wrote:
> I agree with everyone else that's said it. This comes up often enough
> but no one ever has a good workflow that works. I have seen nothing
> proposed in this thread that is good. The ONLY thing gained is "oh
> neat, it's in git". We lose q
On 09.03.2010 14:37, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 03/09/2010 03:17 PM, Florian Pritz wrote:
>> On 09.03.2010 02:20, keenerd wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 19:13:38 -0600, Dan McGee wrote
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:09 PM, keenerd wrote:
> There does not seem to be a documented "standard rsync" co
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> In few days, I will start a new caeer "math professor", I am really
> very happy because it's something I always wanted to study, and
> beyond that, I really like teaching.
> Besides, I work as a teacher in a secondary school in e
Il 09/03/2010 11:23, Allan McRae ha scritto:
Why... namcap in testing works fine.
Well, what about moving testing/namcap to extra?
--
Arch Linux Developer
http://www.archlinux.org
http://www.archlinux.it
On 09/03/2010, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 09/03/10 20:09, Ray Rashif wrote:
>> Btw, aside from namcap (which Ghost1227 semi-patched for
>> PKGBUILD.com),
>
> Why... namcap in testing works fine.
>
>
>> bash-completion for pacman needs to be updated.
>
> Fixed in git:
> http://projects.archlinux.org/
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 03:09:40 Dan McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
>
> wrote:
> > Hello all, my free time is over to stay in the bugtracker in this year.
> >
> > In few days, I will start a new caeer "math professor", I am really very
> > happy because it
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Paul Mattal wrote:
>
> So this is a weird one, but I think I just made some headway.
>
> Apparently, this seems to be related to the ACTUAL CPU of the box I build
> on. When building on an i686 Arch box running on an AMD 64 CPU, the build
> generates the broken bin
On 09/03/10 20:09, Ray Rashif wrote:
Btw, aside from namcap (which Ghost1227 semi-patched for
PKGBUILD.com),
Why... namcap in testing works fine.
bash-completion for pacman needs to be updated.
Fixed in git:
http://projects.archlinux.org/pacman.git/commit/?id=d85421ec
Subject: attempting to build firefox-qt
Date: Tuesday 09 March 2010, 15:40:55
From: Shridhar Daithankar
To: arch-dev-pub...@archlinux.org
Hello,
I am interested in building firefox with Qt. Following directions from
https://wiki.mozilla.org/User:Pjohnsen/MozillaQtBuild, I updated the pkgbuild
On 09/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 9. März 2010 09:19:22 schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
>> What about devs/tus who also maintain AUR packages? As I recall AUR
>> doesn't accept .tar.xz yet?
>
> You cannot upload packages to AUR anyway. Source packages can be kept as
> src.tar.gz. There should
On 03/09/2010 11:04 AM, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
2010/3/9 Manne Merak:
Hi Manne,
Using encfs-1.5-6, boost-1.41.0-2 and openssl-0.9.8m-2 and that works for
me.
Even on your old volumes?
I can create new ones fine with that combination, but have trouble with
mounting old ones.
Would
2010/3/9 Manne Merak :
Hi Manne,
>> Using encfs-1.5-6, boost-1.41.0-2 and openssl-0.9.8m-2 and that works for
>> me.
>
> Even on your old volumes?
> I can create new ones fine with that combination, but have trouble with
> mounting old ones.
> Would you mind sending me the header of your .encfs6.
On 03/09/2010 10:31 AM, Bram Schoenmakers wrote:
2010/3/9 Manne Merak:
Hi Manne,
I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
Did check out the bug reports at Arch and EncFS and after downgrading Boost
to 1.41 I now do not get the config file reading error anymore.
Unfortunately tryin
Am Dienstag, 9. März 2010 09:19:22 schrieb Ng Oon-Ee:
> What about devs/tus who also maintain AUR packages? As I recall AUR
> doesn't accept .tar.xz yet?
You cannot upload packages to AUR anyway. Source packages can be kept as
src.tar.gz. There shouldn't be a reall difference if you compress a pk
2010/3/9 Manne Merak :
Hi Manne,
> I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
> Did check out the bug reports at Arch and EncFS and after downgrading Boost
> to 1.41 I now do not get the config file reading error anymore.
> Unfortunately trying to decode my data results in "Error decoding
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:16 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> some of us already commit xz compressed packages, others don't. We didn't
> really decide on this yet.
>
> So, is there a reason not to recommond every TU and Dev to change PKGEXT to
> .pkg.tar.xz?
>
> We might also want to write
I have problems with the latest update and EncFS.
Did check out the bug reports at Arch and EncFS and after downgrading
Boost to 1.41 I now do not get the config file reading error anymore.
Unfortunately trying to decode my data results in "Error decoding volume
key, password incorrect", my pass
62 matches
Mail list logo
