Re: [arch-general] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-23 Thread slubman
On Saturday 24 April 2010 07:10:46 Gary Wright wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:27 PM, slubman wrote: > > Since the openssl update, whenever I install or update a package with > > pacman, I've got this message as the last pacman output line when a > > package is installed (a new package or an u

Re: [arch-general] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-23 Thread Gary Wright
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:27 PM, slubman wrote: > Since the openssl update, whenever I install or update a package with > pacman, I've got this message as the last pacman output line when a > package is installed (a new package or an update) > > /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link >

[arch-general] /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link

2010-04-23 Thread slubman
Since the openssl update, whenever I install or update a package with pacman, I've got this message as the last pacman output line when a package is installed (a new package or an update) /sbin/ldconfig: /usr/lib/ is not a symbolic link But everything runs fine AFAIK. I'm using x86_64. Does som

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Partha Chowdhury
On this topic, since updating to nvidia 195.36.15, the health icons in vuze/azureus are missing. I searched nvnews.net and found the following thread [1] but with no solution.Have any one else faced this issue ? Currently i have downgraded to kernel 2.6.32 and nvidia 190-53. [1]http://www.nvnews.n

[arch-general] Problem with ext4 and luks

2010-04-23 Thread Brendan Long
I've been using luks + dm-crypt (http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/System_Encryption_with_LUKS_for_dm-crypt) to encrypt / and /home. Both are using ext4. For some reason, mounting / always works, but sometimes I get an error that my /home partition "doesn't describe a valid ext2 filesystem". If I

Re: [arch-general] where did /etc/conf.d/mysqld go?

2010-04-23 Thread Milos Negovanovic
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:42:32AM -0400, dave reisner wrote: >On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Milos Negovanovic ><[1]milos.negovano...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > on last update my /etc/conf.d/mysqld was packsaved and no new version > was installed. Now my non def

Re: [arch-general] where did /etc/conf.d/mysqld go?

2010-04-23 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Friday 23 April 2010 17:37:24 Milos Negovanovic wrote: > Hi, > > on last update my /etc/conf.d/mysqld was packsaved and no new version > was installed. Now my non default MYSQLD_ROOT DB doesnt start any more! > Is this config file no longer supported? Hi, did you set your datadir in /etc/mysql/

Re: [arch-general] where did /etc/conf.d/mysqld go?

2010-04-23 Thread Ionut Biru
On 04/23/2010 06:37 PM, Milos Negovanovic wrote: Hi, on last update my /etc/conf.d/mysqld was packsaved and no new version was installed. Now my non default MYSQLD_ROOT DB doesnt start any more! Is this config file no longer supported? Regards according to the history it was removed: http://

Re: [arch-general] where did /etc/conf.d/mysqld go?

2010-04-23 Thread dave reisner
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Milos Negovanovic < milos.negovano...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > on last update my /etc/conf.d/mysqld was packsaved and no new version > was installed. Now my non default MYSQLD_ROOT DB doesnt start any more! > Is this config file no longer supported? > > Re

[arch-general] where did /etc/conf.d/mysqld go?

2010-04-23 Thread Milos Negovanovic
Hi, on last update my /etc/conf.d/mysqld was packsaved and no new version was installed. Now my non default MYSQLD_ROOT DB doesnt start any more! Is this config file no longer supported? Regards -- Milos Negovanovic milos.negovano...@googlemail.com

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Thomas Jost
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:00:08 +0200, Manne Merak wrote: > On 04/23/2010 03:35 PM, Patrick Baumgart wrote: > I did an update and it was not that bad - small performance hit - but > not big enough to go back to Compiz. > Wow, 45000fps, what card are you using? I get 1800fps with my 8600M GT > and

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Jan de Groot
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 15:35 +0200, Patrick Baumgart wrote: > Another one: I also have in mind that glxgears, started without > parameters on default size, gets me around 45000 fps and now it has > abouot 15000 fps. glxgears is NOT A BENCHMARK. This simple demo just confirms that 3D works, nothing

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Manne Merak
On 04/23/2010 03:35 PM, Patrick Baumgart wrote: Am Freitag, den 23.04.2010, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Manne Merak: On 04/23/2010 09:19 AM, Robert Howard wrote: Works fine here. KDE4.4+Compiz with a pair of GTX 295's. Can't tell any difference between new and old. On Apr 23, 2010 2:32 AM, "

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Patrick Baumgart
Am Freitag, den 23.04.2010, 11:07 +0200 schrieb Manne Merak: > On 04/23/2010 09:19 AM, Robert Howard wrote: > > Works fine here. KDE4.4+Compiz with a pair of GTX 295's. Can't tell any > > difference between new and old. > > > > On Apr 23, 2010 2:32 AM, "Manne Merak" wrote: > > > > I see there are

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Manne Merak
On 04/23/2010 10:13 AM, Gaurish Sharma wrote: On 04/23/2010 12:04 PM, Manne Merak wrote: I see there are some discussions going on the nvidia, KDE and arch forums about the performance of KDE 4.4 and latest nvidia driver, no results yet as I can see. My current setup with 190.53 works fast and

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Manne Merak
On 04/23/2010 09:19 AM, Robert Howard wrote: Works fine here. KDE4.4+Compiz with a pair of GTX 295's. Can't tell any difference between new and old. On Apr 23, 2010 2:32 AM, "Manne Merak" wrote: I see there are some discussions going on the nvidia, KDE and arch forums about the performance of

Re: [arch-general] IceCat and Novell Moonlight pre

2010-04-23 Thread francesco groccia
> Figue wrote: > Same here on i686. Maybe upstream bug? just for our information :-), see: . Cheers, F. Gr.

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Gaurish Sharma
On 04/23/2010 12:04 PM, Manne Merak wrote: I see there are some discussions going on the nvidia, KDE and arch forums about the performance of KDE 4.4 and latest nvidia driver, no results yet as I can see. My current setup with 190.53 works fast and snappy (no special xorg param); but updating t

Re: [arch-general] Latest NVIDIA en kernel update

2010-04-23 Thread Robert Howard
Works fine here. KDE4.4+Compiz with a pair of GTX 295's. Can't tell any difference between new and old. On Apr 23, 2010 2:32 AM, "Manne Merak" wrote: I see there are some discussions going on the nvidia, KDE and arch forums about the performance of KDE 4.4 and latest nvidia driver, no results ye