Guys,
After update to 2.6.33.3-1, network-ups-tools (nut/upsd) starts, but
cannot
communicate with itself on localhost or across the network anymore. The default
abs configuration was used so it isn't with one of my famous configure strings.
It starts fine, but then here is what I get in
At Sonntag, 2. Mai 2010 19:31 Ionut Biru wrote:
> They don't want us to modifying anything without asking for permission.
> For us that will never happen because we have shared xulrunner, we use
> system libs(they don't like that at all).
opensuse has "enable-official-branding" in their specfil
On 04/27/2010 10:11 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
> On 04/27/10 19:58, David Rosenstrauch wrote:
>>
>> Well, the obvious fix is to disable nepomuk. (Which I would do anyway.
>> I'm not a big fan of those disk indexing utils like nepomuk and beagle.)
>> But if you're actually using nepomuk then I'm
On 05/02/10 15:27, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
rollback support and friends are
very cool (this just saved me the other day actually) and i think
would provide a great benefit to the arch rolling model.
it could save one from pacman running out of disk space when installing
something (which pres
> my main issue is that btrfs is advanced and we have much to think
> about the way we want to include it. rollback support and friends are
> very cool (this just saved me the other day actually) and i think
> would provide a great benefit to the arch rolling model.
additionally its not as simple
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Gaurish Sharma
wrote:
> On 05/03/2010 12:40 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
>>
>>
>> BTRFS is not marked stable by the developers yet, its dangerous to include
>> it in the interest of arch newbies. A disk crash may spoil the impression of
>> Arch.
>>
>> In my opinio
On 05/03/2010 12:40 AM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
BTRFS is not marked stable by the developers yet, its dangerous to
include it in the interest of arch newbies. A disk crash may spoil the
impression of Arch.
In my opinion, we should wait some more time till the developers of
BTRFS release
On 05/03/2010 12:13 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
hello,
i maintain an unofficial btrfs initcpio hook in AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33376
BTRFS is not marked stable by the developers yet, its dangerous to
include it in the interest of arch newbies. A disk crash may spoil
hello,
i maintain an unofficial btrfs initcpio hook in AUR:
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33376
the hook provides rollback support among other (future) features.
hook is also required for anyone using a multi-device btrfs setup. i
would like to start/be included in discussion involvi
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> seems that you are not very inform about the lwn article about mozilla and
> trademark [1].
Nor do I claim to be :) It's just something I stumbled upon and wanted
to hear the community's opinion about. I'll read the article.
Denis.
On 05/02/2010 08:28 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Xavier Chantry
Mozilla actually contradicts itself on this matter. [...]
But just below, the trademark policy then says this :
"Again, any modification to the Mozilla product, including adding to,
modifying in any way,
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Xavier Chantry
> Mozilla actually contradicts itself on this matter. [...]
> But just below, the trademark policy then says this :
> "Again, any modification to the Mozilla product, including adding to,
> modifying in any way, or deleting content from the files incl
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 5:26 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
>> Hi archers,
>>
>> If you believe the comment on Mozilla's bugtracker [1] and the change
>> to the license file [2], the previously non-free Firefox graphics are
>> now licensed under the MP
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 18:49, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which was
> updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues with the
> .33 kernel and aufs. Related aufs packages are: aufs2 2.6.33_20100425-2 and
> aufs2-util 2010
This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which was
updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues with the
.33 kernel and aufs. Related aufs packages are: aufs2 2.6.33_20100425-2 and
aufs2-util 20100422-1
In addition to regular sign-off some feedback about a
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Denis Kobozev wrote:
> Hi archers,
>
> If you believe the comment on Mozilla's bugtracker [1] and the change
> to the license file [2], the previously non-free Firefox graphics are
> now licensed under the MPL. Does that mean that we'll be able to have
> official lo
On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 10:05, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Freitag 30 April 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
>> Hi
>> bumped to latest version, please signoff both arches.
> anyone?
Signoff x86_64.
Tested with firmware version 4.178.10.4.
P.S.: I'm going to sell my laptop, so unless another dev
On Sun, 02 May 2010 12:55:19 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
> On 02.05.2010 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
> > On 02/05/10 20:33, Caleb Cushing wrote:
> >> why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
> >
> > Because they were testing builds and never released...
> > Allan
> >
> >
> >
> Come
Hi archers,
If you believe the comment on Mozilla's bugtracker [1] and the change
to the license file [2], the previously non-free Firefox graphics are
now licensed under the MPL. Does that mean that we'll be able to have
official logo in the supported Firefox package?
[1]: https://bugzilla.mozil
On 02.05.2010 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 02/05/10 20:33, Caleb Cushing wrote:
>> why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
>
> Because they were testing builds and never released...
> Allan
>
>
>
Come to think of it, releasing a new set of official isos in a short
while probably cou
On 02/05/10 20:33, Caleb Cushing wrote:
why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
Because they were testing builds and never released...
Allan
why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.blogspot.com
Am Freitag 30 April 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
> Hi
> bumped to latest version, please signoff both arches.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
anyone?
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a
23 matches
Mail list logo
