On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 23:56 +0200, Alexander Duscheleit wrote:
But there seems to be a trend starting in this direction which worries
me a little. IIRC there is nothing holding back Xorg 1.8 except for
legacy nvidia drivers, and that for quite a while. If that is true,
it's even more
I still see the problem. Is it possible that it's bug in GCC?
Lukas
On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
Andreas Radke wrote:
This release works with udev for input hotplugging and
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL?
Best regards,
Guillermo Leira
On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need
On 21/06/10 20:35, Guillermo Leira wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys support
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL?
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most notabaly KDE and Thunar
and in gnome with gnome-power-manager to have some special keys
$ pacman -Qi hal
Name : hal
Version: 0.5.14-4
.
Required By: gnome-vfs vlc
.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.ukwrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 06:46:13AM -0400, Matthew Monaco wrote:
How can I know if I still need HAL?
[...]
After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
... which will, however, only work if hal hasn't been installed
explicitly and will also disregard optdeps.
If
Im not 100% sure if KDE will work whit out hall, but KDE doesent use hal
directly instead it uses the Solid framework of KDE. Solid isint dependant of
one spesific bacend, but its like phonon so you can have multiple differend
back
ends whit it. i do not have any Idea of the state of differend
How can I know if I still need HAL?
run /etc/rc.d/hal stop and remove it from your DAEMONS array. If
stuff breaks, you needed it.
Allan
Thank you very much to all. :-)
I'll have to mix all the answers: I have systems with XFCE and GNOME, physical
and virtual... I'll check
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent news updates: Andreas Radke
wrote:
Andreas
On 06/21/2010 07:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Ionuț Bîrubiru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/21/2010 06:34 AM, jwbirdsong wrote:
On 06/20/2010 09:13 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/06/10 13:04, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 02:31 AM, Arch Linux: Recent
In fact this happeded weeks before, maybe after upgrading to xorg1.8, when
typing in xterm, it left with each letter with an annoying vertical line.
[see the image attached]
I believe this has something to do with compiz-wm, if I switch to the other
window and switch back, those lines gone, but
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Ananda Samaddar ana...@samaddar.co.ukwrote:
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:35:23 +0200
Guillermo Leira gle...@gleira.com wrote:
WOW nice. So HAL is not needed anymore ?
Not for X. You may still need it for other things...
Allan
Most
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now, I want to activate it and I get an error
David C. Rankin kirjoitti maanantai, 21. kesäkuuta 2010 19:33:18:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially,
when I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82
so the box came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to groups then
again to ssl... keeps going on.
What can be the problem ?
--
Regards,
Nilesh
On 06/21/2010 10:03 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now,
On 06/21/2010 11:35 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:33 AM, David C. Rankin
drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82
On 06/21/2010 10:19 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:03 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so
the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to groups then
again to ssl... keeps going on.
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a
loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes to google's ssl for login validation, then back to
mkswap /dev/sdb6
echo /dev/sdb6 swap swap defaults 0 0 /etc/fstab
swapon -av
Thanks to all. That loud 'POP!' you heard was the CRI being cured.
(for the curious, CRI=Cranal Rectal Inversion)
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
Rankin Law Firm, PLLC
510 Ochiltree Street
Nacogdoches, Texas
On 06/21/2010 07:57 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 06/21/2010 07:47 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
When I try to use google groups on firefox, it keeps redirecting in a
loop.
groups.google.com homepage loads, then when I click on any group, it
goes
On 06/21/10 12:33, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of an issue)
But now, I
On 06/21/2010 10:47 PM, Baho Utot wrote:
On 06/21/10 12:33, David C. Rankin wrote:
Guys,
I'm laughing at myself for being unable to get swap activated.
Initially, when
I breezed through the install, I forgot to set /dev/sdb6 to type 82 so
the box
came up with swap off (2G of ram so not much of
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 08:16:27PM +0300, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
just cleaned my profile(cookies, cache and active logins). seems
that now is working
I've noticed another weird thing with firefox: when typing
in the 'search' field (right top), quite frequently the
desktop session ends and I find
Dear Arch community,
I thought I'd post a follow up on some of the things said in the last
thread I created on this list. I'm using upper case for headings just
to make things easier to read and not to shout! Please post or cc all
follow ups to the Arch General list, and read this message
It's not browser specific by the way, it happens on various sites on
different browsers on different OSes: for example, I got stuck in a loop
trying to go to Google Docs in Chrome on Windows. I'm going to say it's
probably a bug in their login system.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Ionuț Bîru
Matthew Monaco wrote:
On 06/21/2010 06:35 AM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
Hi,
How can I know if I still need HAL?
Best regards,
Guillermo Leira
After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server !??? Some
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet.
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes wrong ?
Ignacio
On 21/06/10 22:22, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet.
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes wrong ?
Have you tried to reinstall libsoup?
-- Rafael Correia
2010/6/21 Ignacio Galmarino igalmar...@gmail.com
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet.
and im offered the
On 06/21/2010 10:22 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet.
and im offered the option to delete the clock applet.
Any idea what goes
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/21/2010 10:22 PM, Ignacio Galmarino wrote:
After updating my system today and logging into gnome i get a dialog
with the following error:
The panel encountered a problem while loading OAFIID:GNOME_ClockApplet.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 09:21:39PM +0200, Jérôme M. Berger wrote:
After an upgrade, it will remain on your system if you do a pacman -Qdt
According to that rule, I don't need xorg-server !??? Some packages
are missing a dep here, I think...
That's correct. Only few packages actually
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
is not like is hard to update the build, is more like it doesn't fit in
our principle to bump to a
On 21 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
http://pastie.org/1014264
is not like is hard to update the
On 06/22/2010 12:55 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
On 21 June 2010 22:49, Ionuț Bîrubiru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/22/2010 12:46 AM, Damien Churchill wrote:
Since vala 0.9.2 is now out I figured I'd update the PKGBUILD for it,
just a simple version bump and sha256sum update.
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 19:28 +0100, Ananda Samaddar wrote:
5. LONG TERM GOALS
Most Arch stuff starts out as external projects than then merge with
the main distro. If our work turns out to be useful, and I hope it
will be, I would like us to become an official Arch Team. We could
then
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 07:11:25 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd still like to know how this replaces/conflicts with Arch policy
for 'as upstream as possible'. I'm aware that just starting out the
answer may just be we don't know yet, but for me one of the
benefits of Arch is that
2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-patches
from git/svn).
This is just pessimistic outlook. Having patches means that you're actually
contributing upstream instead of leaching the latest ver every 3 weeks.
People need to stop
Devs,
As mentioned earlier, after my HD tanked, I did my first Gnome only
install
using the Arch 2010-05 install media. Except for my FU forgetting mkswap, the
install is picture perfect. Further, since the radeon/dri/mesa modules are
mature enough that they handle gpu downclocking
On Jun 21, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-
patches
from git/svn).
This is just pessimistic outlook. Having patches means that you're
actually
contributing upstream
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
He said from git/svn... ie backporting, not contributing.
...?
Once they're in svn they're confined to abs? Besides, it's not like there's
anything keeping upstream from looking at obsd cvs, Debian's bug tracker, nor
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 18:47 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Jun 21, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/6/21 Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com:
bugs with upstream, which may not be the case with 5-10 security-
patches
from git/svn).
This is just pessimistic
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Andres P aep...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 7:17 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
He said from git/svn... ie backporting, not contributing.
...?
Once they're in svn they're confined to abs? Besides, it's not like there's
anything
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security decisions regarding
their software.if Arch started naively backporting stuff based of
the latest alert from XYZ, i wouldn't be
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
want _anyone_ other than upstream to make security decisions regarding
their software.if Arch started
Hi,
I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
have been scared of running arch as server.
Please share your experience
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:27 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 22/06/10 12:07, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
my point of this ramble if there is one, is that personally, i don't
want _anyone_ other than
On 06/21/2010 09:40 PM, Gaurish Sharma wrote:
Hi,
I would be interested to know your experience of running arch as
server os. running I use distros like debian,CentOS etc. till now I
have been scared of running arch as server.
Please share your experience
Regards,
Gaurish Sharma
I'm
54 matches
Mail list logo
