On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
This completely broke
On 08/04/2010 05:34 AM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
This completely broke
New version is in testing without a homedir for the mailman user. Please
try to upgrade from last version in our extra repo. Tell us if I broke
something.
-Andy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 23:50 Heiko Baums wrote:
> I hadn't had any post-update maintenance nightmares yet. Well, not
> nightmares. I want to know what is done and what happens on my system.
> Otherwise I would recommend a different distro. But to be honest I had
> a lot more post-update night
On 08/03/2010 02:31 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
You may want to take a look at the Trinity project [1] (unfortunately
the website is down now) if you didn't already. It's a maintained fork
of KDE 3.
[1]http://trinity.pearsoncomputing.net/
Thank you Lukáš, I will definitely take a look.
--
Davi
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 22:59 Mario Figueiredo wrote:
> An argument can be made that this approach makes a rolling release less
> attractive to users who have invested heavily in the supported
> repositories. I heard this much just recently from a former Arch user;
> The possibility of an a
Am Wed, 04 Aug 2010 00:06:53 -0500
schrieb "David C. Rankin" :
> On 08/03/2010 04:14 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > With a particular package, you've no idea which category this falls
> > into. Sure, you could apply the safest approach of always
> > restarting everything that's upgraded, but that's no
On 08/03/2010 11:49 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
Bug reopened. You didn't gave an answer for some days. Please make
sure to divide it into either KMS/module loading is broken or your
Compiz is fucked up.
As written in the bugreport I had to manually put all needed
graphics related modules into the r
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 22:35 Heiko Baums wrote:
> That's a common and necessary task of a Linux admin which doesn't need
> and in my opinion shouldn't be done by the package manager, because the
> package manager can't decide which config files I need or want to
> adjust and when I can and wa
On 08/03/2010 09:22 PM, Caleb Cushing wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
what else do I need to do?
out of curiousity have you tried building your own kernel and
bisecting it? or mailing the lkml?
I've built the rc kernel and it will not even boot. As for bisect
On 08/03/2010 04:14 AM, Peter Lewis wrote:
With a particular package, you've no idea which category this falls into.
Sure, you could apply the safest approach of always restarting everything
that's upgraded, but that's not always practical. IMO it would be nice to have
short indicators when somet
Am Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:31:09 +0200
schrieb Andreas Radke :
> Upstream update, please signoff.
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.32.17
>
> -Andy
>
Bump. It's a security related update.
-Andy
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:09:52 -0500
schrieb "David C. Rankin" :
> Guys,
>
> I still have this problem where the changes to the kernel for
> kernel26 2.6.34 cause my box to hardlock on boot! It happens every
> time after the kernel has booted once after the initial build of the
> initramfs wi
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan McGee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>> please signoff for both arches.
>>
>> I already have
>> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
>
> This completely broke wireless for me on my lapto
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> I already have
> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
This completely broke wireless for me on my laptop. b43 driver, i686
architecture. The wlan0 device would sho
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 6:09 PM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> what else do I need to do?
out of curiousity have you tried building your own kernel and
bisecting it? or mailing the lkml?
--
Caleb Cushing
http://xenoterracide.com
Guys,
I still have this problem where the changes to the kernel for kernel26 2.6.34
cause my box to hardlock on boot! It happens every time after the kernel has
booted once after the initial build of the initramfs with mkinitcpio. It is
frustrating has hell. I opened bug 20200 which was close
On 03.08.2010 23:21, Andre "Osku" Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to
> write it here. and please link me to any previous discussion if this
> was asked before, i was kinda lazy to really search and
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:59:10 +0100
schrieb Mario Figueiredo :
> An argument can be made that this approach makes a rolling release
> less attractive to users who have invested heavily in the supported
> repositories. I heard this much just recently from a former Arch
> user; The possibility of an
Am Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:48:48 +0200
schrieb f...@kokkinizita.net:
> Well, that depends. If a user is upgrading a package X explicitly then
> he/she is probably anticipating the consequences, and has prepared for
> them. If X is updated as a side effect that could be different, and a
> warning would
Hello,
this may be a minor issue, but it's bugging me so much that i had to
write it here. and please link me to any previous discussion if this
was asked before, i was kinda lazy to really search and
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards didn't
mention anything about it.
i
On 03-08-2010 21:35, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:40:20 +0200
schrieb Attila:
It's so simple and every Linux user should or must know this. If a
daemon or any other software is updated it must be restarted either to
use the new version or to get it working if the running version bro
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:35:02PM +0200, Heiko Baums wrote:
> It's so simple and every Linux user should or must know this. If a
> daemon or any other software is updated it must be restarted either to
> use the new version or to get it working if the running version broken
> by the update. And t
Am Tue, 03 Aug 2010 21:40:20 +0200
schrieb Attila :
> Okay, i recognized that i wrote too much under this little thread so
> set it on read if this is too much for you.-)
>
> ...
I must admit, that I didn't read this completely.
It's so simple and every Linux user should or must know this. If a
Okay, i recognized that i wrote too much under this little thread so set it on
read if this is too much for you.-)
The best compromise what i have seen is what zypper (package management tool
for
opensuse) do in a case if libs or a daemon get changed.
After upgrading in such a case you get a w
On 03-08-2010 16:14, Simon Stoakley wrote:
On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
greeting
Am 03.08.2010 16:19, schrieb Stefano Avallone:
> There are a number of fixes about pageflipping with drm/i915 in the changelog
> of 2.6.34.2. So, I installed this new kernel and rebuilt xf86-video-intel
> without the patch to disable pageflipping. I have a G45 graphics and I
> suffered from freq
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 11:14 Peter Lewis wrote:
> I have to admit that the recent dovecot update caught me out too for a few
> minutes, until I realised that I'd had no new email for an eerie amount of
> time.
This is not nice no question but how will you solve changes in the config file
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 08:00 David C. Rankin wrote:
> Well sometimes the stupid ones among us don't always catch that
dovecot is
> being updated when it is one of 73+ updates that take place. But we 'do'
always
> catch the failure to copy to sent -- later :p
If the count of updat
At Dienstag, 3. August 2010 06:39 Tavian Barnes wrote:
> Because of KISS? Pacman is a package manager, not a system administration
tool.
This has nothing to do with package manager or not because dpkg or rpm can do
this without a problem.
> Imagine the story with a different daemon: SSH. You
Oh, hell. I totally clicked on the wrong contact. Please ignore this,
people, and I'm sorry for the noise.
~celti
Let me know if any of you are already getting this, and I'll take you
off the forward.
~celti
-- Forwarded message --
From: Marg Grady
Date: Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 08:55
Subject: *** Dark Ones August Party ***
To: "J.L. Ali"
THE DARK ONES PRESENT: AUGUST PARTY – “ARABIAN NIGHTS”
2010/8/3 jesse jaara :
>>
>> check out http://larch.berlios.de/, I think that tool is written for
>> just this use case.
>>
>> Dieter
>>
>
>
> Doesent larch just create a new arch linux install, if i understood Martín
> he wants to move his whole current system to usb.
>
It depends what he wants.
Hello Stefan,
> That is not quite correct. New TUs are elected by the other TUs, not
> by the "community". But yes, the discussion is open to all.
oh, that is indeed a difference. I'll print an erratum in the next issue.
Best,
Mathias
Am 03.08.2010 13:20, schrieb Mathias Huber:
> Hi,
>
> for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for
> Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online:
>
> http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware
>
> Best Regards,
> Mathias
>
>
Hello
On 3 August 2010 03:04, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:39 -0600, Tavian Barnes wrote:
>> Imagine the story with a different daemon: SSH. You ssh into your
>> box, su, and pacman -Syu. Halfway through the upgrade, openssh gets
>> updated, which automatically restarts the server, w
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 07:12:40AM -0300, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> I've a hp 1020 printer. In order to work, the module usblp must not be loaded.
> So, i remove that from DAEMONS section at /etc/rc.conf
> When i boot Arch, that works fine. The module is not loaded, and the
> printer works.
>
On 03/08/10 09:51, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský:
On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Devel
On 08/03/2010 02:47 PM, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> Yes, that's all i do to configure the printer.
> Now I want to automatize the removal of the module after i turn on the
> printer.
> If there's a rule that loads the module when the printer is turned on,
> I guess there must be a way to catch t
On Tuesday 03 August 2010 10:23:19 Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Latest kernel is in testing,
> > please signoff for both arches.
> >
> > I already have
> > .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
> >
> > greetings
> > tpowa
> > --
> > Tobias
On 03.08.2010 15:47, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> Yes, that's all i do to configure the printer.
> Now I want to automatize the removal of the module after i turn on the
> printer.
> If there's a rule that loads the module when the printer is turned on,
> I guess there must be a way to catch that
Yes, that's all i do to configure the printer.
Now I want to automatize the removal of the module after i turn on the printer.
If there's a rule that loads the module when the printer is turned on,
I guess there must be a way to catch that rule to disable the module
loading.
2010/8/3 vlad :
> Hell
Hi Andre,
> but isn't this part outdated (with xorg 1.8):
>
> "Wer hätte etwa gedacht, dass die USB-Tastatur nach dem X-Start nur
> funktioniert, wenn vorher schon der Hal-Daemon läuft?"
you're right. That was when I installed Arch with X.org 1.7.6 while I
was researching the article.
But it is
Am 03.08.2010 10:51, schrieb Evangelos Foutras:
>> I get following error on x86_64:
>> (1/1) checking for file conflicts []
>> 100%
>> error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files)
>> kernel26: /lib/modules/2.6.34-ARCH/modules.devname exists in filesy
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 09:52:05AM -0300, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> Thanks for the help
> I don't use backlist because in the wiki says so.
>
> In
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CUPS_printer-specific_problems#LaserJet_1020
> i can read:
>
> "Ensure that the usblp module is not
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 13:32:36 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
wrote:
> Still, unified logins is a problem we're having for years. and many
> people have 1 main pc. If browser programmers would implement a small
> and easily accessible "account manager" which uses client ssl
> certificates (and web server/
Thanks for the help
I don't use backlist because in the wiki says so.
In
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/CUPS_printer-specific_problems#LaserJet_1020
i can read:
"Ensure that the usblp module is not blacklisted in the MODULES array
of /etc/rc.conf"
Just in case, I'll try it anyway.
Thanks
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Mathias Huber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for
> Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online:
>
> http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware
>
> Best Regards,
> Mathias
sup
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 11:12 AM, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > I've a hp 1020 printer. In order to work, the module usblp must not be
> > loaded.
> > So, i remove that from DAEMONS section at /etc/rc.conf
> > When i boot Arc
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:58:15 +0100
Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 09:35, Dieter Plaetinck
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
> > jesse jaara wrote:
> >
> >> 2010/8/3 Magnus Therning
> >> >
> >> > One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of
> >> > credentials
On 08/03/2010 11:12 AM, Mario Daniel Carugno wrote:
> Hi list
>
> I've a hp 1020 printer. In order to work, the module usblp must not be loaded.
> So, i remove that from DAEMONS section at /etc/rc.conf
> When i boot Arch, that works fine. The module is not loaded, and the
> printer works.
> But wh
Hi,
for those who wanted to be alerted: My short writeup on Arch Linux for
Linux-Magazin (German Edition) is freely available online:
http://www.linux-magazin.de/Heft-Abo/Ausgaben/2010/09/Frische-Ware
Best Regards,
Mathias
Hi list
I've a hp 1020 printer. In order to work, the module usblp must not be loaded.
So, i remove that from DAEMONS section at /etc/rc.conf
When i boot Arch, that works fine. The module is not loaded, and the
printer works.
But when i turn off, and then turn on the printer, the usblp module is
l
On Tuesday 03 Aug 2010 at 09:28 Magnus Therning wrote:
> > No useless "little 1-line notes" only ment for braindead users.. i
> > only want to see what i need to see.
>
> I doubt I'm as knowledgeable on Linux systems as you, so I'd rather
> like seeing a bit more messages than you need to see.
I
On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 22:39 -0600, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> Imagine the story with a different daemon: SSH. You ssh into your
> box, su, and pacman -Syu. Halfway through the upgrade, openssh gets
> updated, which automatically restarts the server, which SIGHUPs
> pacman, which is left in an inconsi
On 08/03/2010 11:58 AM, Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 09:35, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
jesse jaara wrote:
2010/8/3 Magnus Therning
One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of credentials :-)
For instance OpenID.
I never understood w
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 01:00 -0500, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Well sometimes the stupid ones among us don't always catch
> that dovecot is
> being updated when it is one of 73+ updates that take place. But we
> 'do' always
> catch the failure to copy to sent -- later :p
>
> Serious
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 09:35, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
> jesse jaara wrote:
>
>> 2010/8/3 Magnus Therning
>> >
>> > One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of credentials :-)
>> > For instance OpenID.
>
> I never understood why there is a need for open
2010/8/3 Lukáš Jirkovský :
> On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Latest kernel is in testing,
>> please signoff for both arches.
>>
>> I already have
>> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
>>
>> greetings
>> tpowa
>> --
>> Tobias
>> Powalowski
>> Archlinux Developer & Pack
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
jesse jaara wrote:
> 2010/8/3 Magnus Therning
> >
> > One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of credentials :-)
> > For instance OpenID.
I never understood why there is a need for openid when there are client
ssl certificates. I never got why ssl cli
On 3 August 2010 10:24, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Am Dienstag 03 August 2010 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
>> On 3 August 2010 09:39,
> Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> > Latest kernel is in testing,
>>
>> please signoff for both arches.
>> >
>> > I already have
>> > .35 prepared,
> a fast signoff would b
Am 03.08.2010 09:43, schrieb jesse jaara:
> It is possible you will have to reformat your pendrive to use filesystem
> other than fat, using the journaling filesystems will wearout the pen
> drive fast so ext2 or pisssibly ?nilfs2? are the ones to go whit.
> Also you shouldn't use any swap in usb s
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 08:52, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:00:09 -0500
> "David C. Rankin" wrote:
>
>> Well sometimes the stupid ones among us don't always catch
>> that dovecot is being updated when it is one of 73+ updates that take
>> place. But we 'do' always catch t
Am Dienstag 03 August 2010 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský:
> On 3 August 2010 09:39,
Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Latest kernel is in testing,
>
> please signoff for both arches.
> >
> > I already have
> > .35 prepared,
a fast signoff would be great.
> >
> > greetings
> > tpowa
> > --
> >
Tobias
> > Po
2010/8/3 Magnus Therning
>
> One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of credentials :-)
> For instance OpenID.
>
> /M
>
> --
> Magnus Therning(OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
> magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
> http://therning.org/magnus ident
On 3 August 2010 09:39, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> Latest kernel is in testing,
> please signoff for both arches.
>
> I already have
> .35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
>
> greetings
> tpowa
> --
> Tobias
> Powalowski
> Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
> (tpowa)
> http://www.arc
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 08:30, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:46:41 -0300, Martín Cigorraga
> wrote:
>> I don't know if this was addressed before, I'm sorry to say this and you'll
>> probably hate me but it's something that get my attention: the
>> authentication in Arch's website i
>
> check out http://larch.berlios.de/, I think that tool is written for
> just this use case.
>
> Dieter
>
Doesent larch just create a new arch linux install, if i understood Martín
he wants to move his whole current system to usb.
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:00:09 -0500
"David C. Rankin" wrote:
> Well sometimes the stupid ones among us don't always catch
> that dovecot is being updated when it is one of 73+ updates that take
> place. But we 'do' always catch the failure to copy to sent --
> later :p
>
> Seriously,
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:03 +0300
jesse jaara wrote:
> 2010/8/3 Martín Cigorraga
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is possible to image my current Arch system into a USB pendrive and
> > use it from there?
> > Many thanks!
> >
> > Martín
> >
>
> It is possible you will have to reformat your pendrive to use
>
2010/8/3 Martín Cigorraga
> Hi,
>
> is possible to image my current Arch system into a USB pendrive and use it
> from there?
> Many thanks!
>
> Martín
>
It is possible you will have to reformat your pendrive to use filesystem
other than fat, using the journaling filesystems will wearout the pen
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
I already have
.35 prepared, a fast signoff would be great.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias
Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer
(tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On 3 August 2010 07:50, David C. Rankin wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This is just a point of interest more than anything else. Many of you
> know I came to Arch from suse and one of the reasons was suse announced plan
> to eliminate kde3 in its 11.2 release in early 2009. Arch had chakra and it
> wor
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:46:41 -0300, Martín Cigorraga
wrote:
> I don't know if this was addressed before, I'm sorry to say this and you'll
> probably hate me but it's something that get my attention: the
> authentication in Arch's website is, at least, very unefficient. At worst,
> it's directly aga
74 matches
Mail list logo
