On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 02:34:50PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 19/08/10 14:23, Victor Lowther wrote:
> >I am missing the difference. Diff please?
>
> Yours:
> >>>+ /bin/mknod /dev/rtc c $major $minor
>
> His:
> >>/bin/mknod /dev/${dev##*/} c $major $minor
>
> Yours creates /dev/rtc and his cr
On 19/08/10 14:23, Victor Lowther wrote:
I am missing the difference. Diff please?
Yours:
+ /bin/mknod /dev/rtc c $major $minor
His:
/bin/mknod /dev/${dev##*/} c $major $minor
Yours creates /dev/rtc and his creates /dev/rtc and /dev/rtc0
Allan
I am missing the difference. Diff please?
Sent from my Nexus One
On Aug 18, 2010 2:41 AM, "Kurt J. Bosch"
wrote:
> Am 2010-06-30 23:47, schrieb Victor Lowther:
>> Trying to stick with POSIX syntax only just slows things down.
>> ---
>> rc.sysinit | 27 +++
>> 1 files chang
On a newly-set-up "promiscuous USB" system, I've chosen to skip a DE,
and ultimately also forewent a login manager. Normally, I'd be happy
with an askpass client, but I've noticed that I cannot do without
nm-applet on this installation, and consequently have ended up with
gnome-keyring installed al
Am 17.08.2010 13:52, schrieb Ray Rashif:
> On 17 August 2010 19:32, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
>> Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of 2010-08-17 13:14:44 +0200:
>>> On Tue 17 Aug 2010 13:01 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of 2010-08-17 12:35:41 +0200:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
> Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:30:54, vous avez écrit :
>> Le lundi 16 août 2010 17:24:29, vous avez écrit :
>> > Le lundi 16 août 2010 14:10:10, Dan McGee a écrit :
>> > > Patches are a lot more likely to get looked at by any of us. And yes,
>>
following http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20481 I removed the dependency
on apache.
-Andy
Am Mittwoch 18 August 2010 schrieb David C. Rankin:
> On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> > Call Trace:
> > [] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
> > [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> > [] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbhid]
>
> Tobias,
>
> I'm sure you know, but
On 08/18/2010 01:24 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
Call Trace:
[] usb_kill_urb+0x85/0xc0 [usbcore]
[] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[] usbhid_init_reports+0xb1/0x120 [usbhid]
Tobias,
I'm sure you know, but 'usbhid' is the network-ups-tools driver.
--
David C. Rankin, J.D.,P.E.
On 08/14/2010 04:46 PM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
Tobias,
I updated the box that 2.6.34.3 fails to boot do to dmraid problems
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/20499) to 2.6.35.2-1 and the box boots with
dmraid ju
Andrea Crotti writes:
> Not done yet, even adding the right modes to the xorg.conf I can always
> only see the 1024x576 from xrandr.
>
> But another bad news, some kernel errors (I guess conflicts between psb
> and reiserfs) don't let me start networkmanager anymore, which is a bad
> thing...
Wh
I use ususpw and pm-suspend to suspend my dell mini 1010.
Now the swap partition is on lvm, and every time I reboot it will ask
for it, even if it knows perfectly where it is (it's printed 2 lines
above).
And also it works perfectly after, but I would like to get rid of this
thing asking me every
Not done yet, even adding the right modes to the xorg.conf I can always
only see the 1024x576 from xrandr.
But another bad news, some kernel errors (I guess conflicts between psb
and reiserfs) don't let me start networkmanager anymore, which is a bad
thing...
Andrea Crotti writes:
>
> Ok great, now after
> modprobe psb
> the framebuffer goes to an amazing resolution (the native I guess).
> But starting X is veryy bad still, maybe I have to tell to Xorg to load
> the psb driver...
Very exciting we're almost there, I added this to xorg.conf
--8<--
Andrea Crotti writes:
> Ray Rashif writes:
>
>> I got a hold of the AspireOne. Plugged in my Arch-on-a-Stick and BAM!
>>
>> 3D is DEAD. Or, dying.
>>
>> I'm giving up on this as a regression of intel/mesa, because some
>> months ago this same netbook played UrbanTerror on Ubuntu Netbook
>> Remix
Ray Rashif writes:
> I got a hold of the AspireOne. Plugged in my Arch-on-a-Stick and BAM!
>
> 3D is DEAD. Or, dying.
>
> I'm giving up on this as a regression of intel/mesa, because some
> months ago this same netbook played UrbanTerror on Ubuntu Netbook
> Remix. I can't test it on that again, b
It's good to see finally 4.5 will hit extra :)
>1) Sometimes, when I change settings in 'systemsettings' (forgot which
>ones, have to investigate again), kwin and/or plasma-desktop freeze and
>I cannot do anything but move the mouse or switch to VT.
>2) dolphin segfaults. A lot. All the time. It's
On 18 August 2010 19:25, Andrea Crotti wrote:
> Alexander Duscheleit writes:
>
>> direct rendering is always "Yes" these days, because mesa includes a
>> software render which makes you CPU do all the work.
>>
>> try: glxinfo | grep "^OpenGL"
>>
>> here's what I get on my Intel Laptop:
>> OpenGL
On 18 August 2010 16:37, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
[...]
-- Sven-Hendrik
You need to keep in mind that's its not just the disk space that might
cause problems here but traffic and especially bandwidth are. E.g. the
our mainserver has about 10mbit/d bandwidth including mirroring, website
etc..
On 18 August 2010 16:37, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:19:09 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase
> wrote:
>> On 17.08.2010 16:28, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>>> Am 17.08.2010 16:12, schrieb Dan McGee:
tl;dr: I think we need some standards with these huge packages, and
people need to b
Alexander Duscheleit writes:
> direct rendering is always "Yes" these days, because mesa includes a
> software render which makes you CPU do all the work.
>
> try: glxinfo | grep "^OpenGL"
>
> here's what I get on my Intel Laptop:
> OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc
> OpenGL renderer s
David C. Rankin (2010-08-17 14:45):
> On 08/17/2010 01:44 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >On 08/17/2010 01:27 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> >>I'll go see if I can rebuild with the ahci module loaded in the initramfs
> >>and
> >>see if that helps. But regardless, there is a bug somewhere. LTS boots fi
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:54:26 -0700
Mike Rosset wrote:
> > After playing around i a throwaway-chroot, the problem seems to be
> > libfetch >=2.30. I just modified the PKGBUILD to different versions
> > (without replacing or rebuilding pacman at all).
> >
> > Libfetch 2.26 fetches files without a p
Excerpts from Alexander Duscheleit's message of 2010-08-18 04:07:23 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> since I upgraded to pacman 3.4.0 I notice a strange behavior in the way
> pacman integrates with my local mirror server. First, pacman opens a new
> ftp connection for every download, which spams the logs a lot. S
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:19:09 +0200, Sven-Hendrik Haase
wrote:
> On 17.08.2010 16:28, Thomas Bächler wrote:
>> Am 17.08.2010 16:12, schrieb Dan McGee:
>>> tl;dr: I think we need some standards with these huge packages, and
>>> people need to be a lot more cognizant as to how big they are. We have
>
> After playing around i a throwaway-chroot, the problem seems to be
> libfetch >=2.30. I just modified the PKGBUILD to different versions
> (without replacing or rebuilding pacman at all).
>
> Libfetch 2.26 fetches files without a problem, 2.30+ fails after
> downloading 5 files while MaxInstances
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:06:44 -0700
mike rosset wrote:
> > How would I best go about researching this? I have all the
> > components right here, and it's easy enough to trigger, but I have
> > no experience whatsoever in debugging libraries or C code in
> > general.
> >
> > I could try and set up
Am 2010-06-30 23:47, schrieb Victor Lowther:
Trying to stick with POSIX syntax only just slows things down.
---
rc.sysinit | 27 +++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit
index 29adeca..f3e60b7 100755
--- a/rc.sysinit
On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 07:12 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> Am Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:16:16 +0800
> schrieb Ng Oon-Ee :
>
> > On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 19:44 +0200, Andreas Radke wrote:
> > > Dovecot 2.0.0 has been released and it's in our testing repo (it has
> > > been build against core/extra only). The
On 17.08.2010 16:28, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 17.08.2010 16:12, schrieb Dan McGee:
>> tl;dr: I think we need some standards with these huge packages, and
>> people need to be a lot more cognizant as to how big they are. We have
>> lost more than one mirror due to complaints over needed space and
> How would I best go about researching this? I have all the components
> right here, and it's easy enough to trigger, but I have no experience
> whatsoever in debugging libraries or C code in general.
>
> I could try and set up a chroot to bisect pacman /
> lib{fetch,archive,alpm} but I have no cl
31 matches
Mail list logo
