Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: only call modprobe once

2010-09-19 Thread Dave Reisner
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:57:06AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote: > On 20/09/10 11:54, Dave Reisner wrote: > >Use modprobe -a and a bash PE to filter the MODULES array. > > > >Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner > >--- > > rc.sysinit | 12 > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: only call modprobe once

2010-09-19 Thread Allan McRae
On 20/09/10 11:54, Dave Reisner wrote: Use modprobe -a and a bash PE to filter the MODULES array. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner --- rc.sysinit | 12 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit index 09d5e97..4b6e1e7 100755 --- a/rc.sysin

[arch-general] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: only call modprobe once

2010-09-19 Thread Dave Reisner
Use modprobe -a and a bash PE to filter the MODULES array. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner --- rc.sysinit | 12 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit index 09d5e97..4b6e1e7 100755 --- a/rc.sysinit +++ b/rc.sysinit @@ -92,14 +92,10 @@ if

Re: [arch-general] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: only call modprobe once

2010-09-19 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 08:47:03PM -0400, Dave Reisner wrote: > Use modprobe -a and a bash PE to filter the MODULES array. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner > --- > rc.sysinit |6 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit > index 09d5e9

[arch-general] [PATCH] rc.sysinit: only call modprobe once

2010-09-19 Thread Dave Reisner
Use modprobe -a and a bash PE to filter the MODULES array. Signed-off-by: Dave Reisner --- rc.sysinit |6 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/rc.sysinit b/rc.sysinit index 09d5e97..07180d0 100755 --- a/rc.sysinit +++ b/rc.sysinit @@ -94,11 +94,7 @@ fi # Loa

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread fons
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:22:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > I have updated the wiki to include some basic information on setting > up a local mirror. I believe it provides enough information to help > someone set up local mirror while still holding them accountable for > a certain amount o

Re: [arch-general] How to detect when a package is removed from a group in pacman

2010-09-19 Thread Øyvind Heggstad
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010 17:15:44 + (GMT) F B wrote: > Hi, > recently bin86 was removed from base-devel group but the unique way I > know to see this change is manually reading the pkg changelog in the > arch site. The problem is simple, how to detect this change in > pacman? For example, after a

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Ng Oon-Ee
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 15:17 -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:22:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > If you don't like the attitude don't use arch. Arch isn't here to > > babysit you and hold your hand. This is truly what sets arch apart. > > The users who have been here f

Re: [arch-general] Adobe Releases New 64-bit Flash Plugin For Linux

2010-09-19 Thread Linas
Christian Larsson wrote: > I know it doesn't adress the problem with flash, but are a side note. Most > of us only use flash in order to view flash videos, an most of the time we > also would like to download them. For this ytmp ( > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40172) is a great substi

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Steve Holmes
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 03:22:27PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > If you don't like the attitude don't use arch. Arch isn't here to > babysit you and hold your hand. This is truly what sets arch apart. > The users who have been here for 4-5+ years know exactly what I'm > talking about. Not quite

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.35.3-1 or intel-537-2.60.80.0-68 breaks suspend (to disk and ram)

2010-09-19 Thread Lukas Grässlin
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 09:44:56PM +0200, Lukas Grässlin wrote: > Hi, > > I have exactely the same problem on my Thinkpad X200 since I updated to > 2.6.25. Ah sorry, I meant 2.6.35 of course. Bloody typo -.-

Re: [arch-general] kernel26-2.6.35.3-1 or intel-537-2.60.80.0-68 breaks suspend (to disk and ram)

2010-09-19 Thread Lukas Grässlin
Hi, I have exactely the same problem on my Thinkpad X200 since I updated to 2.6.25. The workaround in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=586674#51 works for me. Why did the break and who did it? :< On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:17:09AM +0200, ert256 wrote: > Hello. > > If you have s

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew Gyurgyik
On 09/19/2010 02:02 PM, Nathan Wayde wrote: On 19/09/10 17:26, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: [...] As I posted on the forum... How hard is it to run rsync and look at the man page for rsync? rsync is the *only* command that is needed to create a local mirror. We want to discourage this behavior as m

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Fess
On 22:31 Sun 19 Sep , Fess wrote: > On 12:26 Sun 19 Sep , Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > On 09/19/2010 11:45 AM, Steve Holmes wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > >>> There is nothing preventing you from creating a local mirror. If you > >>> can't figure out

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Fess
On 12:26 Sun 19 Sep , Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > On 09/19/2010 11:45 AM, Steve Holmes wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: >>> There is nothing preventing you from creating a local mirror. If you >>> can't figure out how to create a local mirror using the reso

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 19/09/10 17:26, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: [...] As I posted on the forum... How hard is it to run rsync and look at the man page for rsync? rsync is the *only* command that is needed to create a local mirror. We want to discourage this behavior as much as possible and it is really quite trivial

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Nathan Wayde
On 18/09/10 19:17, Stefan Erik Wilkens wrote: [...] Guus, I checked the current mirrorlist before replying, correct me if I'm wrong but I can't find any entry relating to the domain Nathan included in his mailing, nor is he listed as a tier1 on the developer's wiki. Maybe I've missed something

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew Gyurgyik
On 09/19/2010 12:16 PM, Mauro Santos wrote: On 09/19/2010 04:45 PM, Steve Holmes wrote: Most distros like to build up their presence and increase the numbers and usage. Obviously if everyone goes out there and attempts to build local mirrors and all, that would put a big drain on the arch pack

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Matthew Gyurgyik
On 09/19/2010 11:45 AM, Steve Holmes wrote: On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: There is nothing preventing you from creating a local mirror. If you can't figure out how to create a local mirror using the resource available, you probably shouldn't be using arch. N

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Mauro Santos
On 09/19/2010 04:45 PM, Steve Holmes wrote: > Most distros like to build up their presence and increase the numbers > and usage. Obviously if everyone goes out there and attempts to build > local mirrors and all, that would put a big drain on the arch package > update process. I don't think many

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread fons
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 08:45:05AM -0700, Steve Holmes wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > > There is nothing preventing you from creating a local mirror. If you > > can't figure out how to create a local mirror using the resource > > available, you probabl

Re: [arch-general] 'Local mirror' page was removed from wiki

2010-09-19 Thread Steve Holmes
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 10:46:13PM -0400, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote: > There is nothing preventing you from creating a local mirror. If you > can't figure out how to create a local mirror using the resource > available, you probably shouldn't be using arch. Now, there's a supportive answer if I ever

Re: [arch-general] Adobe Releases New 64-bit Flash Plugin For Linux

2010-09-19 Thread Mauro Santos
On 09/19/2010 02:18 AM, Caleb Cushing wrote: > ++ the general consensus was to leave 64-bit flash in... when adobe > cancelled it for a bit... I don't know why it ever got removed. I've > had problems recently with flash and I suspect it's due to running a > 32-bit version. > The 64bit version of

Re: [arch-general] There's no need for acpid

2010-09-19 Thread Lukas Grässlin
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 03:14:33PM -0400, Nicolas Bigaouette wrote: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > > > while read event; do > >case "$event" in > >ac_adapter*) > >/usr/sbin/laptop_mode auto > /dev/null 2>&1 > >;; > >esac > > done < /p