On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 11:17 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 18:21 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 08:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > Just don't use Gnome. Upstream is going to make Pulseaudio default. KDE
> > > as well, maybe.
> > >
> > I don't see KDE upstream
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 18:21 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 08:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > Just don't use Gnome. Upstream is going to make Pulseaudio default. KDE
> > as well, maybe.
> >
> I don't see KDE upstream doing that. They have Phonon. What's more, most
> KDE apps toda
2010/11/27 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 13:01 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Philipp Überbacher
>> > Gnome isn't Linux, Gnome is primarily a DAU-top. I don't see why gnome
>> > should govern the direction of every distribution. Yes, ubuntu decided
>> > t
2010/11/28 Ng Oon-Ee :
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 19:34 -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> My experience is that pulseaudio sometimes works for simple desktop audio.
>> Any serious work with audio it just cause (or potentially cause) problems...
>> (again, just my experience)
>
> if (serious audio work)
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 19:34 -0200, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> My experience is that pulseaudio sometimes works for simple desktop audio.
> Any serious work with audio it just cause (or potentially cause) problems...
> (again, just my experience)
if (serious audio work); then
pulseaudio -k; jackd
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 13:01 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Philipp Überbacher
> > Gnome isn't Linux, Gnome is primarily a DAU-top. I don't see why gnome
> > should govern the direction of every distribution. Yes, ubuntu decided
> > that they want to follow and b
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 08:18 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:09 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
> >
> > I stated it before, but I'll say it here, I don't think Pulse Audio is
> > right for [extra]. Compiz is a lot more stable and still manages to stay
> > in [community]. Pulse goes
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 12:09 -0600, Yaro Kasear wrote:
>
> I stated it before, but I'll say it here, I don't think Pulse Audio is
> right for [extra]. Compiz is a lot more stable and still manages to stay
> in [community]. Pulse goes down a lot and takes sound with it and it's
> getting put in [ex
My experience is that pulseaudio sometimes works for simple desktop audio.
Any serious work with audio it just cause (or potentially cause) problems...
(again, just my experience)
On 26.11.2010 21:34, Jan Steffens wrote:
I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
feedback on this.
This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
PulseAudio.
Works great for me on gnome with pu
Στις Σάββατο 27 Νοέμβριος 2010 21:11:10 Δημακάκος Δημάκης γράψατε:
> Στις Σάββατο 27 Νοέμβριος 2010 02:17:59 Δημακάκος Δημάκης γράψατε:
> > Στις Παρασκευή 26 Νοέμβριος 2010 22:34:18 Jan Steffens γράψατε:
> > > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> > > feedback on this.
Στις Σάββατο 27 Νοέμβριος 2010 02:17:59 Δημακάκος Δημάκης γράψατε:
> Στις Παρασκευή 26 Νοέμβριος 2010 22:34:18 Jan Steffens γράψατε:
> > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> > feedback on this.
> >
> > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
> >
> > So I
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:30 AM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>
> (not to mention cool stuff like btrfs support... that's about to lead to
> _managed_ KERNEL rollbacks under Archlinux in < 48hrs... *cough*
> hint... :-)
well once again i've been defeated... i thought i found a clever way
to suppor
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Philipp Überbacher
wrote:
> Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2010-11-27 08:11:04 +0100:
>> 2010/11/27 Ng Oon-Ee :
>> > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:02 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>> >> On Nov 26, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > On
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:26 +0800, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 06:30:36 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> > > > >> for an eventual default by chance?
> > >
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 06:30:36 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> > > >> for an eventual default by chance?
> > > >
> > > > Almost nothing is default on Arch...
> >
> > So
On 11/27/10 at 09:17pm, mwnn wrote:
> Hi,
> After upgrading to the latest xf86-video-intel package I am
> facing the following problems:
> - XDM is not visible (only the mouse pointer shows up; Even though I
> am able to login by entering my username and password).
> - Windows do not move fluen
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 4:49 PM, ianux wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 26/11/10, Seblu a écrit :
>
>
>> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jan Steffens
>> wrote:
>> > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
>> > feedback on this.
>> >
>> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 26/11/10, Seblu a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:34 PM, Jan Steffens
> wrote:
> > I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> > feedback on this.
> >
> > This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
> >
> It w
Hi,
After upgrading to the latest xf86-video-intel package I am facing
the following problems:
- XDM is not visible (only the mouse pointer shows up; Even though I am
able to login by entering my username and password).
- Windows do not move fluently. There is a clearly visible drag.
Regar
On 27-11-2010 13:19, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:33 +, Mauro Santos wrote:
>> On 27-11-2010 01:18, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
feedback on this.
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:55 +, Peter Lewis wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 06:30:36 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> > > >> for an eventual default by chance?
> > > >
> > > > Almost nothing is default on Arch...
> >
> > So
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 11:33 +, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 27-11-2010 01:18, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> >> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> >> feedback on this.
> >>
> >> This either means it works well, or nobod
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
> feedback on this.
>
> This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
>
> So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
> PulseAudio.
Tested ye
I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
feedback on this.
This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME and KDE users running
PulseAudio.
I tested it a while on KDE and as expected it has downsides compared to
usin
On Saturday 27 November 2010 06:30:36 Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> > >> Good to see the overwhelming positive lean; is pulse being considered
> > >> for an eventual default by chance?
> > >
> > > Almost nothing is default on Arch...
>
> So you should ask Gnome. And the answer is that yes, it will be default
On 27-11-2010 01:18, Ng Oon-Ee wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 21:34 +0100, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> I've put PulseAudio into [testing] some time ago, but received no
>> feedback on this.
>>
>> This either means it works well, or nobody uses it.
>>
>> So I'm asking for it now, especially from GNOME an
27 matches
Mail list logo
