On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Andreas Radke wrote:
> We had to add ugly compat packages because liblrdf and soprano can't be
> ported to the latest releases.
>
> Please test if anything went broken. The packages shouldn't stay long
> in testing.
>
> -Andy
I see that the {redland,rasqal}-compat
On 04/22/2011 04:47 PM, Marek Otahal wrote:
On Friday 22 of April 2011 23:23:03 Richard Schütz wrote:
Am 22.04.2011 23:18, schrieb Marek Otahal:
Hi,
regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what
is Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's
sear
On Friday 22 of April 2011 23:23:03 Richard Schütz wrote:
> Am 22.04.2011 23:18, schrieb Marek Otahal:
> > Hi,
> > regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what
> > is Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's
> > search behavior.
> >
> > [marek@b
Am 22.04.2011 23:18, schrieb Marek Otahal:
Hi,
regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what is
Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's search
behavior.
[marek@beruska ~]$ pacman -Ss syslog
core/perl 5.12.3-1 [12.06 MB] (base) [installed]
* Marek Otahal [22.04.2011 23:19]:
> Hi,
> regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what is
> Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's search
> behavior.
>
> [marek@beruska ~]$ pacman -Ss syslog
> core/perl 5.12.3-1 [12.06 MB] (base) [install
Hi,
regarding the recent 'default syslog' discussion I wanted to check what is
Arch up to now...I came to interesting results concerning pacman's search
behavior.
[marek@beruska ~]$ pacman -Ss syslog
core/perl 5.12.3-1 [12.06 MB] (base) [installed]
A highly capable, feature-rich programming
good question, the same happens with systemd
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:18 AM, cantabile wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 03:32 PM, Cédric Girard wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today I wanted to install the group (xorg-apps). But there is a package
>> with
>> the same name. I did not find a way to tell pacman I wan
Hi guys,
please signoff 2.6.38.4 series for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
tp...@archlinux.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
2011/4/22 Andrzej Giniewicz :
> Hi,
>
>> The main issue now is linking to lapack, which fails. There is a
>> symlink hack (you can refer to the python3- PKGBUILD in AUR), but we
>> do not know why and how (this works). Without that hack, SciPy should
>> not be choosy about linking to static or dyna
Hi,
> The main issue now is linking to lapack, which fails. There is a
> symlink hack (you can refer to the python3- PKGBUILD in AUR), but we
> do not know why and how (this works). Without that hack, SciPy should
> not be choosy about linking to static or dynamic lapack libs, but in
> this case i
2011/4/22 Andrzej Giniewicz :
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to ask if there are any important issues regarding update of
> python-scipy? It's been flagged out of date for nearly two months,
> that's quite long time for Arch standards! Is there any issue
> remaining to be solved, anything I can help with?
Am Freitag 22 April 2011 schrieb Tom Gundersen:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Thomas Bächler
wrote:
> > Version 0.6.10 was busted, this time everything should be fine (finally).
> >
> > Thomas Bächler (2):
> > Rewrite parse_cmdline (again)
> > Release version 0.6.11
> >
> > Ther
On 23 April 2011 00:08, Andrzej Giniewicz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to ask if there are any important issues regarding update of
> python-scipy? It's been flagged out of date for nearly two months,
> that's quite long time for Arch standards! Is there any issue
> remaining to be solved, anythi
Hi all,
I'd like to ask if there are any important issues regarding update of
python-scipy? It's been flagged out of date for nearly two months,
that's quite long time for Arch standards! Is there any issue
remaining to be solved, anything I can help with? I'd really like to
see this updated to 0.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Version 0.6.10 was busted, this time everything should be fine (finally).
>
> Thomas Bächler (2):
> Rewrite parse_cmdline (again)
> Release version 0.6.11
>
> There is a problem: The new filesystem package was moved to core and
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Hugo Yamashita wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Seblu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen
>> wrote:
>
> I know you'll all hate me for saying this, but usually Ubuntu finds every
> driver you might need... try loading Ubuntu using a
On 04/22/2011 03:32 PM, Cédric Girard wrote:
Hi,
Today I wanted to install the group (xorg-apps). But there is a package with
the same name. I did not find a way to tell pacman I wanted the group and
not the package.
I ended doing this:
sudo pacman -S `pacman -Sg xorg-apps | sed 's!xorg-apps \(
Kaiting Chen wrote:
>
> [...]
> Second cronie will in no way `replaces=('dcron')` but will most likely
> `conflicts=('dcron')`. Therefore while it will be impossible to install both
> on the same system having cronie in [core] will in no way force existing
> users to switch.
>
> [...]
> Next it is
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:32:07 +0200, Cédric Girard
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today I wanted to install the group (xorg-apps). But there is a package
>> with
>> the same name. I did not find a way to tell pacman I wanted the group and
>> not the
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:32:07 +0200, Cédric Girard
wrote:
Hi,
Today I wanted to install the group (xorg-apps). But there is a
package with
the same name. I did not find a way to tell pacman I wanted the group
and
not the package.
I ended doing this:
sudo pacman -S `pacman -Sg xorg-apps | sed
Hi,
Today I wanted to install the group (xorg-apps). But there is a package with
the same name. I did not find a way to tell pacman I wanted the group and
not the package.
I ended doing this:
sudo pacman -S `pacman -Sg xorg-apps | sed 's!xorg-apps \(.*\)!\1!'`
But there must be an easier way. An
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Seblu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen
> wrote:
> > Hey Hugo,
> >
> > Thanks a lot! I tried it and and tried to log out and log in again, but
> > "xinput list" doesn't change its output. :(
> >
> > Xianwen
> >
> > On 04/18/2011 07:37 PM, Hug
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Xianwen Chen wrote:
> Hey Hugo,
>
> Thanks a lot! I tried it and and tried to log out and log in again, but
> "xinput list" doesn't change its output. :(
>
> Xianwen
>
> On 04/18/2011 07:37 PM, Hugo Yamashita wrote:
>>
>> Have you tried "modprobe psmouse"?
>> Works
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> please signoff 2.6.38.3 series for both arches.
>
> signoff i686
It seems I spoke to soon. I'm seeing a minor issue with my iwl3945
wireless nic. The problem is descri
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
> you know what would be reeaally cool?
> A cron daemon that can read user crontabs from $HOME/.config/crontab or
> something. I think all user-specific stuff should be in $HOME,
> although it would probably require a posix acl to allow the
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:53:31 +0300
Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 07:23 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:07:35 -0400
> > schrieb Kaiting Chen:
> >
> >> First of all the cronie in [community-testing] is compiled with
> >> --enable-anacron. It installs not only an /etc/crontab b
On 04/22/2011 07:23 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:07:35 -0400
schrieb Kaiting Chen:
First of all the cronie in [community-testing] is compiled with
--enable-anacron. It installs not only an /etc/crontab but also an
/etc/anacrontab. Scripts in '/etc/cron.hourly' are run directly
27 matches
Mail list logo
