On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:24:43 +
"Okky Hendriansyah" wrote:
> Have you heard about the in-kernel ZFS for Linux?
I did, but got feeling that btrfs might be better option for the Linux.
Sincerely,
Gour
--
“In the material world, conceptions of good and bad are
all mental speculations…” (Sri
Hi Gour,
Have you heard about the in-kernel ZFS for Linux? (http://zfsonlinux.org)
project? I think there are some AUR packages for it.
Thanks.
Okky Hendriansyah
-Original Message-
From: Gour-Gadadhara Dasa
Sender: arch-general-bounces@archlinux.orgDate: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:17:49
To:
Hello!
After package manager which can server both official repos & AUR,there is
another thing which I consider before returning back to Arch - filesystem.
On FreeBSD I now use zfs running on two 1TB disks in mirror (raid-1) mode.
I'd like to have similar setup on Arch, but without using lvm2+ra
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:55:47 +0200
Heiko Baums wrote:
> If someone wants to have pacman and AUR totally separated and don't
> want a wrapper for both at the same time, aurbuild is a good
> alternative for yaourt.
I prefer to have them connected. :-)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
“In the material world,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 00:08, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 12:02 AM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
>>
>>> Shorter would be
>>> $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/**libcanberra.so.0 firefox
>>>
>>
>> That was already discussed, and regardless it didn't h
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 17:40, Allan McRae wrote:
>
> On 22/08/11 03:10, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee wrote:
>
> For the daring, pick your pois
On 22/08/11 03:10, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae wrote:
On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGeewrote:
For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
* pacman -U
http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Rogutės Sparnuotos
wrote:
> Did you try running a vanilla version from getfirefox.com (e.g. [1])?
> Download, unpack, cd and run ./firefox.
We have a winner! I guess I'll just use this, thanks.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
Samuel Baldwin (2011-08-21 12:21):
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
> > But why are you trying to downgrade to FF4 instead of FF5?
>
> Well, I had never used FF5 so I have no idea if it'd work. FF4 worked
> like a charm until I updated everything. I'll give that a spin thoug
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> from what i see it starting fine. You don't see any window draw? Do i
> understand well?
Nope, no window ever comes up. It'll just sit there for ages.
> have you check to see if there is another firefox process running?
Yes. There are none.
On 08/22/2011 12:15 AM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
i still don't get it what is the error...
Me neither! Firefox doesn't say anything, running with LD_DEBUG=files yields:
http://lusitania.logik.li/files/firefox6.log
The super large logfile linked
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> i still don't get it what is the error...
Me neither! Firefox doesn't say anything, running with LD_DEBUG=files yields:
http://lusitania.logik.li/files/firefox6.log
The super large logfile linked in the first email contains the output
of LD_DE
On 08/22/2011 12:02 AM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
Shorter would be
$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 firefox
That was already discussed, and regardless it didn't help.
i still don't get it what is the error...
--
Ionuț
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:
> Shorter would be
> $ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 firefox
That was already discussed, and regardless it didn't help.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
> can you run export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 and then in the same
> terminal session firefox
Shorter would be
$ LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 firefox
mar77i
It might be possible to write a script which does all of those Linux
commands on the wiki page automatically at the right time during the
installation. We might call that the arch-extra script and have people
run that script as a single step during the installation. Probably
every Linux distr
Getting it now. Thanks for the great work you put into this.
~Kyle
Sent from my Wishdroid! :)
Hi all,
I'm proud to announce the latest edition of my TalkingArch project.
TalkingArch consists of modified Arch Linux ISO images, customized
for the blind. Both Speakup and Brltty are provided.
Assuming that there are no issues with your sound card, your machine
should start speaking as soon as
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Filip Filipov
wrote:
> this, like the bug report, is for firefox 6 not 4
I had tried it with both just to be safe. It doesn't make a
discernible difference with firefox 6.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 20:42, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Filip Filipov
> wrote:
> > guess :
> > can you run export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 and then in the
> same
> > terminal session firefox
>
> Doesn't complain about not being able to LD_PRELOAD, but
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Filip Filipov
wrote:
> guess :
> can you run export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0 and then in the same
> terminal session firefox
Doesn't complain about not being able to LD_PRELOAD, but I still get
the "Can't load XPCOM." error.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logi
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 19:56, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Filip Filipov
> wrote:
> > looking at the (short) log file can you try the solution from this bug
> > report https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25678
>
> ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0' from LD
On 08/21/2011 07:14 PM, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
do you aware that the log file is about 36M?
Yup. Wasn't sure what else to do with it.
xz. It compressed a >400 MiB log file to <10 MiB iirc.
(sorry for the off-topic)
--
cantabile
"Jayne is
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>
>>> For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
>>>
>>> * pacman -U
>>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
>>> *
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Filip Filipov
wrote:
> looking at the (short) log file can you try the solution from this bug
> report https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/25678
ERROR: ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libcanberra.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD
cannot be preloaded: ignored.
It does exist on the file
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 19:21, Samuel Baldwin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jesse Jaara
> wrote:
> > But why are you trying to downgrade to FF4 instead of FF5?
>
> Well, I had never used FF5 so I have no idea if it'd work. FF4 worked
> like a charm until I updated everything. I'll gi
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Jesse Jaara wrote:
> But why are you trying to downgrade to FF4 instead of FF5?
Well, I had never used FF5 so I have no idea if it'd work. FF4 worked
like a charm until I updated everything. I'll give that a spin though.
--
Samuel Baldwin - logik.li
But why are you trying to downgrade to FF4 instead of FF5?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:37 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> do you aware that the log file is about 36M?
Yup. Wasn't sure what else to do with it.
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:37 AM, 甘露(Gan Lu) wrote:
> Can't start even with a new profile? It seems an add-on problem to me.
I tried moving .mozilla to .m
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 02:52, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>
>>> For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
>>>
>>> * pacman -U
>>> http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
>>> *
On Sunday 21 of August 2011 15:06:25 Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a custom hook [1] (opencrypt to setup encrypted partitions for me)
> > and last days (well, a couple of months maybe:P) I'm getting this on
> > every mkinitcpio
>
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Marek Otahal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a custom hook [1] (opencrypt to setup encrypted partitions for me)
> and last days (well, a couple of months maybe:P) I'm getting this on
> every mkinitcpio
> generation:
>
> -> Parsing hook: [opencrypt]
> ==> WARNING: Hook 'ope
Am Sun, 21 Aug 2011 13:57:47 +0200
schrieb José M. Prieto :
> I have not used any other helper (only bauerbill, which no longer
> works) so I can not speak of them.
If someone wants to have pacman and AUR totally separated and don't
want a wrapper for both at the same time, aurbuild is a good
alt
El sábado 20 de agosto de 2011, Myra Nelson
escribió:
> To me using an AUR helper to install the deps automattically is
> like blindly doing this "pacman -syu" [...]
yaourt tells you every dependency it needs to install and stops at every
single package, letting you view/edit each PKGBUILD and in
Hi,
I have a custom hook [1] (opencrypt to setup encrypted partitions for me)
and last days (well, a couple of months maybe:P) I'm getting this on
every mkinitcpio
generation:
-> Parsing hook: [opencrypt]
==> WARNING: Hook 'opencrypt' uses a deprecated 'install' function.
This should be renamed '
On 21/08/11 17:40, Myra Nelson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee wrote:
For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
* pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
A
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 12:28, Dan McGee wrote:
> For the daring, pick your poison (by architecture):
>
> * pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-i686.pkg.tar.gz
> * pacman -U http://dev.archlinux.org/~dan/pacman-4.0.0rc1-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz
>
> Allan, Dave, and I (and probably
On 08/21/2011 10:39 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 08/21/2011 10:30 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
What went wrong when you downgraded to Firefox 4 via ARM?
xulrunner links to old hunspell and it can't be loaded
--
Ionuț
Isn't hunspell avail
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 08/21/2011 10:30 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
>>
>> What went wrong when you downgraded to Firefox 4 via ARM?
>
> xulrunner links to old hunspell and it can't be loaded
>
> --
> Ionuț
>
Isn't hunspell available in the ARM?
On 08/21/2011 10:30 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
The topic says it all. I recently pacman -Syu'd and firefox has
refused to start after this. I've tried rolling back to firefox 4 (and
xulrunner 2) but I just get an error about XPCOM not load
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Samuel Baldwin
> wrote:
>> The topic says it all. I recently pacman -Syu'd and firefox has
>> refused to start after this. I've tried rolling back to firefox 4 (and
>> xulrunner 2) but I just get an error a
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
> The topic says it all. I recently pacman -Syu'd and firefox has
> refused to start after this. I've tried rolling back to firefox 4 (and
> xulrunner 2) but I just get an error about XPCOM not loading.
>
> Trying to start firefox 6 just yield
42 matches
Mail list logo
