On 06/01/12 18:00, Patrick Buddeberg wrote:
Maybe is my little understanding of the situation, but isn't
linux-api-headers behind what it (appears to me that it) should be?
The linux-api-headers package is entirely unrelated to the running or
installed kernel. It contains the headers that
On 06/01/12 05:44, Dan McGee wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
Hey all,
I've just dropped kmod-3 into testing as a replacement for
module-init-tools. This is still a young project,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 01:38, Myra Nelson myra.nel...@hughes.net wrote:
Fisrt Kmod experience, which spit out a lot of udevd messages, logged in,
startx, openbox starts, then one locked up box. I was going to Ctrl Alt F2,
log in, and do some work with udevadm but I had no keyboard of mouse
Am 06.01.2012 02:58, schrieb Jonathan Vasquez:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Hi :)
regarding to the rt issues I followed the explanations at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12132 .
I still get an issues with
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 .
It's not only the described problem. If I boot 3.1.7-1-Arch I get
nvidia: version magic '3.0-rt' should be
IMPORTANT: In line with the first change, it needs to be pointed out
that we will no longer package /etc/modprobe.d/modprobe.conf. This means
that if you wrote to that file, it will be .pacsave'd on removal of
m-i-t and you must rename it. We will continue to ship what used to be
called
Am 06.01.2012 09:34, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
regarding to the rt issues I followed the explanations at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12132 .
I still get an issues with
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32908 .
It's not only the described problem. If I boot 3.1.7-1-Arch I get
On 05/01/12 11:43, Cédric Girard wrote:
Hi,
haskell-text [1] has been flagged out of date in [extra], mid-November. It
has not been updated since.
Since this package has no maintainer I'm not sure this has even been
noticed.
This package is a dependency for the git version of xmobar [2].
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
On 05/01/12 11:43, Cédric Girard wrote:
Hi,
haskell-text [1] has been flagged out of date in [extra], mid-November.
It
has not been updated since.
Since this package has no maintainer I'm not sure this has even been
noticed.
I have two computers, both using nvidia driver.
My laptop started flawlessly, after I renamed empty file
modprobe.conf.pacsave to modprobe.conf in /etc/modprobe.d/
On my desktop computer, all went bad.
udevadm trigger doesn't work. I had to downgrade both packages (kmod
replaced by
Von: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org im Auftrag von Thomas Bächler
Gesendet: Fr 1/6/2012 10:25
Apparently, the nvidia-all PKGBUILD does it wrong. I don't know why it
exists - you can install nvidia from [extra] and create a package for
nvidia-rt. At least then you know the PKGBUILD does
On Jan 6, 2012 5:25 PM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 09:34, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
regarding to the rt issues I followed the explanations at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12132 .
I still get an issues with
Am 06.01.2012 11:17, schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
Von: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org im Auftrag von Thomas Bächler
Gesendet: Fr 1/6/2012 10:25
Apparently, the nvidia-all PKGBUILD does it wrong. I don't know why it
exists - you can install nvidia from [extra] and create a package for
nvidia-rt.
Von: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org im Auftrag von Thomas Bächler
Gesendet: Fr 1/6/2012 11:28
I suspect the AUR's nvidia-rt will conflict with the package nvidia?!
No, the AUR's nvidia-rt package should be what you want (if you diff the
nvidia and nvidia-rt PKGBUILDs, the differences
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:56 AM, fredbezies fredbez...@gmail.com wrote:
I opened a bug on archlinux
BTS : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27846
For the record, this has now been fixed in testing.
-t
On Friday 06 of January 2012 15:30:16 Roman Kyrylych wrote:
My bad. Sorry, no working i686 with cryptsetup.
For such cases a user signoff request on arch-general may be useful.
Or just move it without signoff.
user sign-off for cryptsetup on i686, 4 partitions on a laptop, running daily.
all
2012/1/6 Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:56 AM, fredbezies fredbez...@gmail.com wrote:
I opened a bug on archlinux
BTS : https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/27846
For the record, this has now been fixed in testing.
-t
Thanks for the fix. It works now :)
--
Frederic
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 12:03 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Von: arch-general-boun...@archlinux.org im Auftrag von Thomas Bächler
Gesendet: Fr 1/6/2012 11:28
I suspect the AUR's nvidia-rt will conflict with the package
nvidia?!
No, the AUR's nvidia-rt package should be what you want (if you
PS:
I tried editing the AUR's kernel-rt (see 1. and 2. trial) and I tried to
should be ^ nvidia-rt PKGBUILD
build a package using abs (see 3. trail), all failed.
Am 06.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
[ 8.889] Current Operating System: Linux archlinux 3.0-rt #1 SMP
PREEMPT RT Mon Dec 26 13:03:51 CET 2011 x86_64
The -rt kernel package still uses the old versioning scheme, where the
patchlevel is removed from the version string. This means that the
PPS:
Regarding to the 3.1 vs 3.0 issue, is there the need to use an older
version of the proprietary nvidia driver with current kernel-rt? I don't
need the latest proprietary driver for my computer.
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
[ 8.889] Current Operating System: Linux archlinux 3.0-rt #1 SMP
PREEMPT RT Mon Dec 26 13:03:51 CET 2011 x86_64
The -rt kernel package still uses the old versioning scheme, where the
Am 06.01.2012 16:57, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
[ 8.889] Current Operating System: Linux archlinux 3.0-rt #1 SMP
PREEMPT RT Mon Dec 26 13:03:51 CET 2011 x86_64
The -rt kernel package still uses
Hello,
I have been trying to figure out what package installs the gnu shread
program and have had no luck. Pacman doesn't seem to know either and I was
hoping someone here might know. If their is another way of looking this
up, I would be interested to know as well.
$ pacman -Qo shread
error:
On 06.01.2012 18:42, Squall Lionheart wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to figure out what package installs the gnu shread
program and have had no luck. Pacman doesn't seem to know either and I was
hoping someone here might know. If their is another way of looking this
up, I would be
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Squall Lionheart
headmastersqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to figure out what package installs the gnu shread
program and have had no luck. Pacman doesn't seem to know either and I was
hoping someone here might know. If their is another way
coreutils owns /bin/shread, but you seem to have your own local copy.
--
Scott Lawrence
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Do you mean shred?
Never heard of shread..
Anyways shred is part of coreutils.
You should install pkgtools btw, it contains pkgfile which lets you
know what package provides.
2012/1/6 Squall Lionheart headmastersqu...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have been trying to figure out what package installs
Do you mean shred?
Never heard of shread..
Yes I did, I found that I was just typing it wrong and the shread that I
have on my system is something I wrote a long time ago and it confused me.
Sorry for the noise and thanks for your help.
On Jan 6, 2012 3:27 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 02:58, schrieb Jonathan Vasquez:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Tobias Powalowski
tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
Upstream
2012/1/5 Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package Maintainer (tpowa)
http://www.archlinux.org
Hi :)
there's no audio output by a HDSPe AIO, neither for
$ pulseaudio --kill, nor for $ pulseaudio --start.
Maybe I miss the forest for the trees. I'm not working on my Arch Linux
at the moment, I just tried to get some sound on the quick from YouTube
and then speaker-test.
A test tone from
On 01/06/2012 01:39 PM, Laurent Carlier wrote:
2012/1/5 Tobias Powalowski tobias.powalow...@googlemail.com
Hi guys,
please signoff 3.2 series for both arches.
Upstream
changes:
http://kernelnewbies.org/LinuxChanges
greetings
tpowa
--
Tobias Powalowski
Archlinux Developer Package
On Jan 7, 2012 12:02 AM, Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 16:57, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 16:47 +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote:
Am 06.01.2012 16:32, schrieb Ralf Madorf:
[ 8.889] Current Operating System: Linux archlinux 3.0-rt #1 SMP
PREEMPT RT
Below is an excerpt from the integrity check results from arch-dev-public.
It seems like most (if not all) of these are provided by perl, though the
actual packages are in AUR. What is the appropriate solution (before anyone
says the bugtracker, there are already two bugs about this [1] and [2]).
I am trying to update a AUR pkgbuild I found and the source file when I
download it has a - in the file name
name_2.0.1-beta1
I figure out using ${pkgver//_/-} converts it properly when listing it
as name_2.0.1_beta1.
The problem I have run into and can not seem to find info about or
Recently, I noticed that my laptop and server are using different cron
utility.My laptop is using dcron while server using cronie.
Then,I did some digging about the Arch default cron utility.I found a
[discussion](http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2011-April/019282.html)
happend
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 00:12, Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 06/01/12 18:00, Patrick Buddeberg wrote:
Maybe is my little understanding of the situation, but isn't
linux-api-headers behind what it (appears to me that it) should be?
The linux-api-headers package is entirely unrelated
Am Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:49:48 +0800
schrieb 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezh...@gmail.com:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron?
I would still recommend fcron.
Heiko
On Jan 6, 2012 9:52 PM, Patrick Buddeberg perchy22
perch...@gmail.com@perch...@gmail.com
gmail.com perch...@gmail.com wrote:
Honestly, even a Let Me Google that For You link would be useful to
my mental blocked self right now.
http://
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Don Juan donjuans...@gmail.com wrote:
the tarball being downloaded converts properly and dl's fine, it just seems
to be in the next step for package, unless I just really am not grasping
this yet. If so feel free to say I need to read more. But I think its
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 07:41:32PM -0800, Don Juan wrote:
I am trying to update a AUR pkgbuild I found and the source file
when I download it has a - in the file name
name_2.0.1-beta1
I figure out using ${pkgver//_/-} converts it properly when listing
it as name_2.0.1_beta1.
The
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 05:50:06 +0100
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I would still recommend fcron.
+1
Sincerely,
Gour
--
As the ignorant perform their duties with attachment to results,
the learned may similarly act, but without attachment, for the
sake of leading people on the
Thank you.
-Patrick
On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 05:50:06AM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Sat, 7 Jan 2012 11:49:48 +0800
schrieb 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezh...@gmail.com:
Which cron utility should I use,cronie or dcron?
I would still recommend fcron.
I am using dcron, and am quite satisfied with it. Can you
45 matches
Mail list logo
