On 20.01.2012 02:18, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Tavian Barnes
> wrote:
>> On 19 January 2012 18:23, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
>>> a funny bug in the Xorg server that could allow attackers with physical
>>> access to a machine to bypass the screensaver/screen locker pr
On 20.01.2012 02:08, Tavian Barnes wrote:
> On 19 January 2012 18:23, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
>> a funny bug in the Xorg server that could allow attackers with physical
>> access to a machine to bypass the screensaver/screen locker program.
>> Most people use those programs to lock their computer
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 18:11, Nils wrote:
> With much help from the Archlinux Mailing List (they all have Python3) I
> think I have found the problem and its solution.
> Fontscaling in the graphic area for different dpi than 96x96 is now
> forbidden. The fonts remain the same pixel size.
> You
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Tavian Barnes
wrote:
> On 19 January 2012 18:23, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
>> a funny bug in the Xorg server that could allow attackers with physical
>> access to a machine to bypass the screensaver/screen locker program.
>> Most people use those programs to lock th
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Nils wrote:
> With much help from the Archlinux Mailing List (they all have Python3) I
> think I have found the problem and its solution.
> Fontscaling in the graphic area for different dpi than 96x96 is now
> forbidden. The fonts remain the same pixel size.
> Y
With much help from the Archlinux Mailing List (they all have Python3) I think
I have found the problem and its solution.
Fontscaling in the graphic area for different dpi than 96x96 is now forbidden.
The fonts remain the same pixel size.
You are still very welcome to try it out after a git pull!
On 19 January 2012 18:23, Dmitry Korzhevin wrote:
> a funny bug in the Xorg server that could allow attackers with physical
> access to a machine to bypass the screensaver/screen locker program.
> Most people use those programs to lock their computer when they are
> away. On Gnome, gnome-screensav
On 20-01-2012 00:08, Don Juan wrote:
>> I just restarted, and it's exhibiting the same behavior.
> Happens for me as well, fully updated and restarted.
>
Works fine here. Fully up-to-date x86_64, radeon driver, xscreensaver, xfce.
--
Mauro Santos
On 01/19/2012 04:07 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
I just restarted, and it's exhibiting the same behavior.
Do you have a Happy Hacking Keyboard? ;-)
Retract my last statement. I do not have the issue still my bad :(
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nils wrote:
>> You will see 5 lines and a symbol. The symbol must be perfectly alingned
>> within the five lines (one pixel above can be tolerated). It should look
>> like this: http://www.wargsan
On 01/19/2012 04:04 PM, David J. Haines wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
On 01/20/2012 01:32 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM
Thank you very very much for that information!
This problem is the last piece before I can do my first (alpha) release.
With xrandr --fbmm I could reproduce the error on the first try so I can do
further tests myself now.
And it really is a font issue. The lines in the display are correct but my
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:04 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> I just restarted, and it's exhibiting the same behavior.
Do you have a Happy Hacking Keyboard? ;-)
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 01:32 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Michael Holmes wrote:
> Cannot reproduce, using xkeyboard-config 2.4.1-3, xscreensaver with
> Xfce 4.8. Looks like the testing version has this patched.
There's none, the only xkeyboard-config we have in the synced mirrors
is already in extra:
http://www.archlinu
Cannot reproduce, using xkeyboard-config 2.4.1-3, xscreensaver with
Xfce 4.8. Looks like the testing version has this patched.
On 01/20/2012 01:32 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin
wro
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:32 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
>>> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin
>>> wrote:
ctrl+atl+*(on num lock keyboard) confirmed and
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:28 AM, David J. Haines wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin
>> wrote:
>>> ctrl+atl+*(on num lock keyboard) confirmed and work in arch linux.
>>
>> On a fully updated system?
>> http://m
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin
> wrote:
>> ctrl+atl+*(on num lock keyboard) confirmed and work in arch linux.
>
> On a fully updated system?
> http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-January/024298.html
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Dmitry Korzhevin
wrote:
> ctrl+atl+*(on num lock keyboard) confirmed and work in arch linux.
On a fully updated system?
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2012-January/024298.html
a funny bug in the Xorg server that could allow attackers with physical
access to a machine to bypass the screensaver/screen locker program.
Most people use those programs to lock their computer when they are
away. On Gnome, gnome-screensaver is responsible for this. On KDE,
kscreenlocker is. There
Am 20.01.2012 00:02, schrieb Andrzej Giniewicz:
> today one of users of one of my packages (daggerfall in AUR) noticed,
> and I confirmed, that makepkg wasn't able to extract needed files,
> while it was working perfectly for pacman 3.x. The message is
>
> -> Extracting dos32a-912-bin.zip with bsd
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:50:24 +0100
Thomas Bächler wrote:
> Am 19.01.2012 23:31, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> > I am trying to find the mapping between actual modules and net-pf-X
> > aliases which used to be in /usr/include/linux/socket.h but not anymore...
>
> Why would they be there?
Uhmm... O
today one of users of one of my packages (daggerfall in AUR) noticed,
and I confirmed, that makepkg wasn't able to extract needed files,
while it was working perfectly for pacman 3.x. The message is
-> Extracting dos32a-912-bin.zip with bsdtar
binw/: Can't remove already-existing dir
bsdtar: Error
Am 19.01.2012 23:31, schrieb Leonid Isaev:
> I am trying to find the mapping between actual modules and net-pf-X
> aliases which used to be in /usr/include/linux/socket.h but not anymore...
Why would they be there?
> Does anybody know where these aliases are defined now?
grep net-pf- /lib/
On 01/19/12 17:19, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Could you please answer me with the following information attached: Your graphic driver
(type ("ati, nvidia, intel" etc. and closed or open source?) and desktop
enviroment/window manager (Gnome, KDE, xfce, i3 etc.). If you want to add more
informati
Hi,
I am trying to find the mapping between actual modules and net-pf-X
aliases which used to be in /usr/include/linux/socket.h but not anymore...
Does anybody know where these aliases are defined now?
Thanks.
--
Leonid Isaev
GnuPG key ID: 164B5A6D
Key fingerprint: C0DF 20D0 C075 C3F1 E
Nils wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I hope this is not offtopic and I hope to find help here because Archlinux
> has python3 as default python.
>
> I have a software, a Music Notation Editor, here that can start in a
> one-liner and I need to find a bug that only occurs on some systems.
>
> git cl
On 01/19/2012 02:17 PM, Bastien Dejean wrote:
Hi,
My '/etc/rc.local' contains the following lines:
echo EHC1> /proc/acpi/wakeup
echo EHC2> /proc/acpi/wakeup
Those commands were working fine before Linux 3.2.
But now, they seem to be ineffective (i.e. the corresponding devices are
May not be much help, but
Prior to 3.2 I had to use "echo USB0 > /proc/acpi/wakeup" to allow my
keyboard/mouse to wake up the computer (USB0 was disabled by default).
Now with 3.2 this no longer the case (USB0 is enabled by default).
In my case, I want it disabled since I have my keyboard
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Nils wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> You will see 5 lines and a symbol. The symbol must be perfectly alingned
> within the five lines (one pixel above can be tolerated). It should look like
> this: http://www.wargsang.de/pyqt-bug-report.jpg
> Do you see that symbol shi
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Nils wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I hope this is not offtopic and I hope to find help here because Archlinux
> has python3 as default python.
>
> I have a software, a Music Notation Editor, here that can start in a
> one-liner and I need to find a bug that only occu
2012/1/19 Nils :
> Hello list!
>
> I hope this is not offtopic and I hope to find help here because Archlinux
> has python3 as default python.
>
> I have a software, a Music Notation Editor, here that can start in a
> one-liner and I need to find a bug that only occurs on some systems.
>
> git c
Hi,
My '/etc/rc.local' contains the following lines:
echo EHC1 > /proc/acpi/wakeup
echo EHC2 > /proc/acpi/wakeup
Those commands were working fine before Linux 3.2.
But now, they seem to be ineffective (i.e. the corresponding devices are
marked as '*disabled' in the output of `cat /proc/
On 20/01/12 07:35, Nils wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I hope this is not offtopic and I hope to find help here because Archlinux
> has python3 as default python.
>
> I have a software, a Music Notation Editor, here that can start in a
> one-liner and I need to find a bug that only occurs on some s
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:35, Nils wrote:
> You will see 5 lines and a symbol. The symbol must be perfectly alingned
> within the five lines (one pixel above can be tolerated). It should look like
> this: http://www.wargsang.de/pyqt-bug-report.jpg
> Do you see that symbol shifted up or down or
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nils wrote:
> You will see 5 lines and a symbol. The symbol must be perfectly alingned
> within the five lines (one pixel above can be tolerated). It should look like
> this: http://www.wargsang.de/pyqt-bug-report.jpg
> Do you see that symbol shifted up or down o
Le jeudi 19 jan 2012 à 19:35:59 (+0100), Nils a écrit :
> You will see 5 lines and a symbol. The symbol must be perfectly alingned
> within the five lines (one pixel above can be tolerated). It should look like
> this: http://www.wargsang.de/pyqt-bug-report.jpg
> Do you see that symbol shifted up
Hello list!
I hope this is not offtopic and I hope to find help here because Archlinux has
python3 as default python.
I have a software, a Music Notation Editor, here that can start in a one-liner
and I need to find a bug that only occurs on some systems.
git clone git://github.com/nilsgey/L
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Karol Blazewicz
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista
> wrote:
>> Yes, i did it
>> Atts,
>
> This is getting ridiculous. Please *don't*
> - top-post
> - quote whole messages
> - include legal notices in your mail
- send three usel
> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:24:51 +0100
> From: fredbezies
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Subject: Re: [arch-general] gnome-shell 3.2.2-1's problem?
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 2012/1/19 ???
>
> > today,i upgrade gnome-shell to 3.2.2-1
On do, 2012-01-19 at 14:59 -0300, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote:
> Yes, i did it
> Atts,
>
> Paulo Roberto
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 12:43 -0300, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista wrote:
> >> Yes,
> >> I'm sure this pacman -U
> >>
> >>
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Paulo Roberto P. Evangelista
wrote:
> Yes, i did it
> Atts,
This is getting ridiculous. Please *don't*
- top-post
- quote whole messages
- include legal notices in your mail
yes, i installed the rebuilt packet!
Atts,
Paulo Roberto
AVISO LEGAL
...Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem
é dirigida, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente
privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, desde já
fica notificado de ab
yes, the file is there!
Atts,
Paulo Roberto
AVISO LEGAL
...Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem
é dirigida, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente
privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, desde já
fica notificado de abster-se a divu
Yes, i did it
Atts,
Paulo Roberto
AVISO LEGAL
...Esta mensagem é destinada exclusivamente para a(s) pessoa(s) a quem
é dirigida, podendo conter informação confidencial e/ou legalmente
privilegiada. Se você não for destinatário desta mensagem, desde já
fica notificado de abster-se a divulgar, copi
Florian Pritz on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:44:18 +0100:
> On 01/19/2012 09:45 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> > 2012/1/19 Magnus Therning :
> >> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:58, Divan Santana
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
> >>>
> >>>
On 01/19/2012 09:45 AM, Timothée Ravier wrote:
> 2012/1/19 Magnus Therning :
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:58, Divan Santana wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>>>
>>> There is a quite a serious security problem.
>>>
>>> Is there a patch co
On 01/19/12 at 09:57am, Magnus Therning wrote:
>
> Yes indeed, that works. What the hell was that other article doing
> mentioning all those Fn-keys then?
>
> --
> Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
Just confirming that it works. I hope arch adds the patch to the repos so
On 01/19/2012 08:24 AM, fredbezies wrote:
> 2012/1/19 朱格宏
>
>> today,i upgrade gnome-shell to 3.2.2-1,but i found notify tray of bottom
>> doesn't work.
>> e.g:
>> open pidgin or deluge will add icon to notify tray and i can click it to
>> activate app,
>> but it does't work now when i upgrade gn
Hi,
a quick fix I developed for my Fedora 16 box:
1. Dump the xkb:
$ xkbcomp $DISPLAY xkb.dump
2. Make a backup
$ cp xkb.dump xkb.dump_orig
3. Remove all entries related to XF86ClearGrab and XF86Ungrab
4. Apply the XKB entries:
$ xkbcomp xkb.dump $DISPLAY
In case of any problems restore the origi
2012/1/19 Timothée Ravier :
> 2012/1/19 Magnus Therning :
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:58, Divan Santana wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>>>
>>> There is a quite a serious security problem.
>>>
>>> Is there a patch coming out soon?
>>>
2012/1/19 Magnus Therning :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:58, Divan Santana wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>>
>> There is a quite a serious security problem.
>>
>> Is there a patch coming out soon?
>> Does anyone yet know a workaround to th
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 08:58, Divan Santana wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> As per http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
>
> There is a quite a serious security problem.
>
> Is there a patch coming out soon?
> Does anyone yet know a workaround to this in the meanwhile?
> Can it be annou
56 matches
Mail list logo
