Check "Notify of new comments" at
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt/ , so next time you don't
need to ask a stupid question about an official unsupported tool
anymore, at an AUR unrelated mailing list, since the yaourt comments
nowadays are misused as a forum, it's impossible to miss even t
On 02/29/2016 07:59 PM, David C. Rankin wrote:
> I'll keep playing with it. I've been through the BIOS (there are about 50
> settings for RAM/ECC alone, most have 'Auto' setting). I'll double-check there
> as well. The box was apparently working fine before it came to me (I don't
> know
> how long
Most of us actually build our AUR packages ourselves.
Best regards,
Jonathan Villatoro
El feb 29, 2016 8:26 PM, "Marshall Neill"
escribió:
>
> OK, fill me in. What are they using then. I see a lot of posts about
yaourt not working, so I guess I assumed wrongly.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 02/
On 02/29/2016 09:25 PM, Marshall Neill wrote:
> OK, fill me in. What are they using then. I see a lot of posts about
> yaourt not working, so I guess I assumed wrongly.
Some people don't use the AUR at all.
Those who do have a number of AUR helpers to consider, assuming they
don't simply use
OK then, you have my apologies for going off the handle and assuming
something that I shouldn't have.
Guess I learned to eat some humble pie today.
Again, my apologies.
On 02/29/2016 08:23 PM, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 02/29/2016 09:17 PM, Marshall Neill wrote:
No I am not, but, yaourt c
OK, fill me in. What are they using then. I see a lot of posts about
yaourt not working, so I guess I assumed wrongly.
On 02/29/2016 08:19 PM, Jason Ryan wrote:
On 29/02/16 at 08:17pm, Marshall Neill wrote:
After all yaourt is used by most everyone…
Patently false.
/J
On 02/29/2016 09:17 PM, Marshall Neill wrote:
> No I am not, but, yaourt crashes with package-query issue.
> Now, am I wrong for asking.
> After all yaourt is used by most everyone and it would seem to me that a
> simple yaourt -S alsi, a simple program with no real dependencies, would
> install
On 29/02/16 at 08:17pm, Marshall Neill wrote:
After all yaourt is used by most everyone…
Patently false.
/J
--
http://jasonwryan.com/
GPG: 7817 E3FF 578E EEE1 9F64 D40C 445E 52EA B1BD 4E40
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
No I am not, but, yaourt crashes with package-query issue.
Now, am I wrong for asking.
After all yaourt is used by most everyone and it would seem to me that a
simple yaourt -S alsi, a simple program with no real dependencies, would
install and not crash.
package-query seems to be the issue h
On 02/29/2016 08:54 PM, Marshall Neill wrote:
> This is what I fail to understand; How did this get out of testing when
> obviously something is broke?
Are you seriously suggesting it is the Arch Linux AUR developers who are
responsible for making sure every single AUR helper in existence
support
On Monday, 29 February 2016 19:54:54 IST Marshall Neill wrote:
> This is what I fail to understand; How did this get out of testing when
> obviously something is broke?
AUR does not promise any stability, unlike core and extra packages.
--
Cheers
Jayesh Badwaik
On 02/29/2016 07:30 PM, P. A. López-Valencia wrote:
> There is no problem there. Arch's default kernel configuration supports
> up to and including 32 cores.
>
>> >The reason I ask is it always hangs after it says Booting Kernel
>> > (immediately
>> > after decompress). When I memtest the me
This is what I fail to understand; How did this get out of testing when
obviously something is broke?
On 02/29/2016 07:10 PM, Rafael Fontenelle wrote:
2016-02-29 21:03 GMT-03:00 Jayesh Badwaik :
Hi,
I am no longer to view any AUR packages using either packer or yaourt. Is
anybody else fa
El 29/02/2016 a las 6:44 p. m., David C. Rankin escribió:
> All,
>
>This may be a stupid question. If so I apologize. Do I have to do anything
> different to boot the arch install media on a board with 4 Opteron 8360
> processors (16 core total), or should the kernel just handle however many
On Monday, 29 February 2016 22:10:00 IST Rafael Fontenelle wrote:
> yaourt 1.7 is (or should be) compatible with package-query 1.8. A new
> version of yaourt will follow in a few days :)
Thank you. I guess I will be using pacaur for a few days then.
--
Cheers
Jayesh Badwaik
2016-02-29 21:03 GMT-03:00 Jayesh Badwaik :
> Hi,
>
> I am no longer to view any AUR packages using either packer or yaourt. Is
> anybody else facing the same problems?
>
> $ yaourt -Ss visit
> community/visitors 0.7-4
> A very fast web log analyzer
> $
>
>
> --
> Jayesh Badwaik
>
The mainta
On 02/29/2016 07:03 PM, Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am no longer to view any AUR packages using either packer or yaourt. Is
> anybody else facing the same problems?
>
> $ yaourt -Ss visit
> community/visitors 0.7-4
> A very fast web log analyzer
> $
>
>
Update package-query and an
I saw the same thing earlier today. cower and pacaur were working, however.
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Jayesh Badwaik
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am no longer to view any AUR packages using either packer or yaourt. Is
> anybody else facing the same problems?
>
> $ yaourt -Ss visit
> community/visito
Hi,
I am no longer to view any AUR packages using either packer or yaourt. Is
anybody else facing the same problems?
$ yaourt -Ss visit
community/visitors 0.7-4
A very fast web log analyzer
$
--
Jayesh Badwaik
All,
This may be a stupid question. If so I apologize. Do I have to do anything
different to boot the arch install media on a board with 4 Opteron 8360
processors (16 core total), or should the kernel just handle however many cores
there are?
The reason I ask is it always hangs after it says
20 matches
Mail list logo
