Re: [arch-general] opinion request about Firefox add-ons

2016-01-31 Thread Attila
r, I'm not talking about the Google search engine, but about > "safe browsing" and other Google features used by Firefox. If you want to spend some time with reading: http://www.ghacks.net/2015/08/18/a-comprehensive-list-of-firefox-privacy-and-security-settings/ See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shutdown and reboot not working after last weekend update

2012-06-12 Thread Attila Vangel
by visudo (you can change the editor of it, just google it)), so that these commands can be executed without entering the password all the time... Maybe not the best thing still, but I guess it's OK with me. Regards, Attila 2012/6/12 Victor Silva vfbsi...@gmail.com: snip Folks after the last upgrade

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

2011-04-07 Thread Attila
fcrontab with a slightly different syntax. We could actually make cronie replace dcron. I agree with this instead i'm a fcron user. But because it is say so much often, is there really anyone who have something in /etc/cron.d? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Change Arch's default crond

2011-04-06 Thread Attila
only the size and the /etc/cron.d support is on the list. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Dropping Oracle OpenOffice

2011-03-09 Thread Attila
Sorry your your assist was too good :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] knotify4 is eating 90%+ of the CPU in gnome - can it be reniced or something?

2011-03-02 Thread Attila
be more the reason that it starts. But on the other side if i see your cpu load than deactivating could be even better.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kde4 loads kde3 parts -- is this a packaging issue?

2011-02-26 Thread Attila
and in /var/tmp. But starting with runlevel 3 and delete all kde things in both directories could never be wrong. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [trinity-devel] x86_64 kdesktop.kcrash [SOLVED - it is glibc]

2011-02-23 Thread Attila
of qcow. But the handling with virtualbox is easier so David see this only as an information and not as an suggestion. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] vi dependency mailx - why not mailx-heirloom?

2011-02-17 Thread Attila
if you can drive a jag? Okay, i'm not a dev, but mailx-heirloom provides mailx provides=('mailx') and therefore all shoould be fine. I myself ask me more why there is not conflicts array in the PKGBUILD of mailx-heirloom. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment

2011-01-20 Thread Attila
ata_id to another place. I think the biggest problem for writing a bugreport is that this happens very, very seldom. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] When will Arch switch to Upstart

2011-01-19 Thread Attila
(or a business date) to have the answer(s) if he is back than 12h be not very long.-) See you, Attila

[arch-general] is udev-164 a safe solution at the moment

2011-01-19 Thread Attila
with this because it is very seldom and therefore very hard to find out what is the problem. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kernel 2.6.37 BKL

2011-01-07 Thread Attila
At Samstag, 8. Januar 2011 01:17 Karol Babioch wrote: You shouldn't let this any gamer hear, although most of them are properly using windows for that ;). I don't think that using UDF with DVD-RAM is only important for gamer.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Testing kills shm and pts

2010-12-13 Thread Attila
,mode=1777 0 0 All my favorite browser (opera, firefox and chromium) have their cache inside of /tmp but i don't use a script for copying the profile. Good luck, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nilfs-utils moving in core

2010-12-07 Thread Attila
good reports about it be very attractice. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [extra] repository cleanup

2010-11-14 Thread Attila
NEW REPO: NULL 2010-11-12 libXYZ - OLD REPO: COMMUNITY NEW REPO: EXTRA Is there any change that this could realize without too much extra cost? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [extra] repository cleanup

2010-11-14 Thread Attila
Thanks a lot. I don't know about number 2 and 3 but this informations be very helpfull ( and more than i want but i said 'without too much extra cost' :) ). See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Opencl/Cuda headers

2010-11-12 Thread Attila
be chosen, through this installer option. And i can't find (vdpau.h and vdpau_x11.h) or (cuda.h, cudaGL.h, cudaVDPAU.h, cl.h, cl_gl.h, cl_platform.h) if i extract the NVIDIA installer. I think your plan is so good as before and the README be right. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

2010-11-11 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 11. November 2010 20:16 Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote: So, not a mail since a while. Can we replace dcron now? :) What i don't understand is this replace here because fcron (or incron) is only one pacman -S away. And i say this as an fcron user. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Replace dcron once again?

2010-11-11 Thread Attila
... which is not normal because some distributions ships only one cron and only this one could discuss about replacing. :) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] New nvidia driver - video mode not recognized - remove vga= from kernel line?

2010-10-30 Thread Attila
. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] New nvidia driver - video mode not recognized - remove vga= from kernel line?

2010-10-28 Thread Attila
of your bootloader. I don't have nomodeset but blacklist nouveau in one of the files from /etc/modprobe.d. This works too. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Screen goes black after installing latest nvidia driver

2010-10-25 Thread Attila
. Perhaps it would be better if people with this problem compare their configurations. take a look yourself: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=14 And where is one of this reports? Sorry, but posting no url would be better in this case.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Screen goes black after installing latest nvidia driver

2010-10-25 Thread Attila
glasses.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-08 Thread Attila
of an rpm based system with using RPMDELETE as the flag seems easier to find out such files. Is there a analog way possible for pacman? I never take a look after an update with pacman. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-08 Thread Attila
/scan_deleted_files.sh #!/bin/sh # list of deleted files echo 'COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE/OFFNODE NAME' lsof -n | grep ' DEL ' See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-07 Thread Attila
. I'm pretty sure that this could be much optimized, but i hope the idea is clear If you find something for this this would be very, very nice.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
misunderstood my lines: I can live perfectly that we the users do this by ourselves instead that the packaging comsumes more and more time. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
is your problem than this idea could be something for you: # cat /etc/cron.daily/pacman.updates #!/bin/sh { /usr/bin/pacman -Sy echo /usr/bin/pacman -Sup } | /usr/bin/mail -s $(hostname -s): Arch Updates YourUser No question, this is more simple than perfect. -) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
how much is the effort to realize such a luxury solution and is it this worth. That is why i never wrote a feature request instead i think this idea is very nice.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
or that it is unacceptable that we users do this by ourselves. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
stories about updates in archlinux which runs without a problem instead the list of packages was enormous. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Shouldn't pacman restart dovecot after update?

2010-08-03 Thread Attila
other rpm basesd distribution, do the same as archlinux with *.rpmsave and *.rpmnew files. As i said in the other posting, i don't think that any packager on this planet do mistakes with intent but they be even possible because we are all only humans. -) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-25 Thread Attila
this very simple answer. Anyway, you should direct your idea(s) to pacman-dev. I think it is too late to change it and still again if this helps the devs than it is okay for me. I start only this thread because at first i thought that i have overseen something in the config file. See yoou, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-24 Thread Attila
rm. For me this link is now a good help (and memory) to run namcap which i forgot in the most cases and therefore i found my peace with it. But i can understand the wish for a config variable if some don't need this. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-24 Thread Attila
-a $LOGFILE There is room to optimize it with test statements and so on.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-23 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 07:26 Allan McRae wrote: Or do you mean that a makepkg -c will clean elder invalid symlinks? This one. Is there a way to delete not only elder symlinks and the destination too? Could be very nice but is not a must.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-23 Thread Attila
? I start using a shell script for running makepg. At the moment i have no better idea to delete it. But for running namcap right after makepkg this symlink is an advantage. See you, Attila

[arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
PACKAGER=Attila sysad...@hunnen PKGEXT='.pkg.tar.gz' [/server/work is a cifs mount point] Have i overseen something in the makepkg.conf to control this or does no one have this problem ... or is this a new feature which have to be so? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
there. And i never install my own packages with pacman -U because i have my own repo on the server. Therefore i use pacman -S because than i can install it from my other pc too. Or do you mean that a makepkg -c will clean elder invalid symlinks? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2010 06:06 Dan McGee wrote: It is also a very helpful symlink for those of us that like to run namcap after building to check the package. That is an advantage ... because i forgot in the most cases to run it and now the motivation to do it is higher.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] makepkg creates symlink to the package file

2010-06-22 Thread Attila
help because you get remembered that there is a older package in your repo. At the end i must say that this symlink is not a problem for me and there be advantages too so i can live with it. So please don't see my points as criticism. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] mpfr-3.0.0-1, gcc-4.5.0-6 and libmpc-0.8.2-2

2010-06-12 Thread Attila
the step with the other distros. But this be only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev 157-1, initscripts 2010.06-1, mkinitcpio 0.6.5-1

2010-06-03 Thread Attila
this works in the rc.conf? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [signoff] udev 157-1, initscripts 2010.06-1, mkinitcpio 0.6.5-1

2010-06-03 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 3. Juni 2010 23:59 Thomas Bächler wrote: Actually, network rules are an exception, they still work. The removal of NAME= only applies to /dev nodes. Thanks for this information and this sounds better for me as my first understanding of it. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] This is the arch-general list - Was Burning From Command Line

2010-05-27 Thread Attila
be blamed alone? if you want to ban, he should not be only one. +100 and if you ban someone than you have to ban me because i'm the startpoint of this underthread ... a little cue in this case would be helpfull.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Burning From Command Line

2010-05-26 Thread Attila
, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-03 Thread Attila
you and Allan said is not a productive way. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-03 Thread Attila
/openSUSE_11.2/src This is only an information and not a feature request.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Firefox graphics licensed under MPL

2010-05-02 Thread Attila
and use system libs with a shared xulrunner too. So from my view you can ask them but i'm not an expert of it because i use my own package (kde integration). Perhaps this is more a problem for Debian than for archlinux. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Open Konsole Here ???

2010-03-19 Thread Attila
the konqueror as filemanger instead of dolphn than you can choose the shortcut by yourself. if you want another terminal than you can do this in the systemsettings under standard components. Have fun with it, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-19 Thread Attila
At Freitag, 19. Februar 2010 12:01 Heiko Baums wrote: Right, that's what NoUpgrade in pacman.conf does. ;-) Thanks for the smiley at the end because i was very silly (oder anderes gesagt die Leitung auf der ich stand ging mindestens zweimal um die Erde -) ). See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-18 Thread Attila
no one is thinking that it was simple mistake. That is all what i want to say and myself wouldn't have a problem with it. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-18 Thread Attila
/*' than the lib of every new or updated package will get installed with the '.pacnew' ending? Than there is no risk that is true and i'm wrong. Sorry for thinking too much complicated in this case. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pacman.conf: can I use wildcards?

2010-02-17 Thread Attila
don't know weeks or months later what i have done ... but this be more my self-critical 2c.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-02 Thread Attila
both are not so much different in our opinions (perhaps we should try it in german -) ) but instead of you i don't see the cache on my local disk as a backup. That is why i use own kernel packages to be on the safe side.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-02 Thread Attila
). I said only my opinion about this wish to have multiple kernel versions. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Multiple Kernels

2010-02-01 Thread Attila
. On the other side i think it is even worth to have an own kernel package and the PKGBUILD of kernel26 makes it very easy to do this. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-29 Thread Attila
to use install scripts to adjust the permissions after install. I must say that using install scripts is from my view for permissions or setcap even the better way because than i don't need to be root to create a package. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-29 Thread Attila
file. Thanks for the warning that is unsafe but how longer we discuss about doing the same with capabilities how more i like to stay with the gold old solution.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
/usr/bin/cdrecord If i do this than i cannot open '/dev/sg1' and therefore i will stay with my way instead it is obsolete. Thanks for the hint, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
into memory = cap_ipc_lock proc_priocntl Increase priority Nothing found. net_privaddrAllow ports 1024, needed for RSCSI cap_net_bind_service Is it really such a problem to stay with chmod 4710? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-28 Thread Attila
At Donnerstag, 28. Januar 2010 20:38 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: I did nothing about group, only root perms ;) Keep the group ;) Ah okay that is the difference. But is this really necessary because this way sounds like i have to know things what i never wants to know.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
a laywer and see what happens in reality inf front of a court instead of voting. This would be better for everybody of us than this kind of confrontation. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
you for cdrtools which i use now under linux and in the past under OS/2. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-27 Thread Attila
root:optical $n /bin/chmod -v 4710 $n; done /bin/echo done. Than the user has only to be in the group optical. It works but perhaps a expert should say if this is okay. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] An old, tiresome discussion: cdrtools vs cdrkit

2010-01-24 Thread Attila
blu-ray creation hard. My upstream bug report on their mailing list was completely ignored, for example [1]. This is another reason to stay with the original. Thanks for this information. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Quoting of E-mails

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
At Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010 06:27 Loui Chang wrote: I also find mutt's 'T' helps. It hides the quoted text. Very nice feature. Does anyone knows if this is possible in knode too? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] building x86_64 packages under qemu?

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
? http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Boot_from_virtio_block_device If you use disklabels in your vm (menu.lst, fstab) than you have only to change your start script. This helps a lot but sure it can't replace fast hardware. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] building x86_64 packages under qemu?

2010-01-12 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010 01:43 Damjan Georgievski wrote: he is not using kvm (and kvm will not make a virtual 64bit cpu on a 32bit guest) Thanks for this hint. I thought he is using kvm because the binary has the same name. This was a mistake of mine. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Kernel 2.6.32 Broken

2009-12-31 Thread Attila
to use an own kernel package for 2.6.31.x to have this as fallback and therefore better possibilies to find out why 2.6.32 don't works for you. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Xorg changes / DRM modules

2009-12-23 Thread Attila
issues in testing before we move stuff to core/extra. I believe that you and the other arch devs will gives all. Thanks for this work. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] kernel 2.6.32-1

2009-12-05 Thread Attila
for yourself. Second is that this discussions about what is the arch way here in public get a religious touch instead of what it has to be: First the arch devs should decides (and discuss) this and second the pragmatical way is even better than the academical way. Just only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
) and a big more condensed (X). I must say that the new version for the fonts looks better for me but this be only my 2c. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-02 Thread Attila
At Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009 10:51 Raghavendra Prabhu wrote: Qt 4.6 works fine for me And you you have a vertical LCD? But no problem if not because this sounds nice and i hope it will give KDE some speedup. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Qt 4.6.0

2009-12-01 Thread Attila
: http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=67031 I hope this will not be the same story.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] pam settings INSECURE

2009-11-18 Thread Attila
nullok /etc/pam.d/common-session: session requiredpam_limits.so session requiredpam_unix2.so session optionalpam_umask.so Perhaps it could be a good idea to compare what other distributions do and optimize the files from archlinux. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] kde4 tip - quicklaunch in your panel -- convenience at your fingertips!

2009-11-11 Thread Attila
dolphin could be good file manager but in comparison to it for me never.-) Just for the stats (and to say some positive thing too): Now at the moment the Perfomance of KDE4 is realy good. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-11-01 Thread Franczen Attila
2009/11/1 Celti celticmad...@gmail.com: I would love an invite, if someone has one to spare. Me too. I've been wanting to play with this ever since I saw the intro video about it. So if anyone has a spare invitation, please drop it to francz...@gmail.com Thanks in advance, Attila

Re: [arch-general] google wave

2009-11-01 Thread Franczen Attila
2009/11/1 Trav maw...@gmail.com: Sent nomination for both muhammad.a.qa...@gmail.com and francz...@gmail.com! Thank you, I really appreciate it. Attila

Re: [arch-general] DE

2009-09-10 Thread Attila
and i'm missing only little things. The wiki from archlinux says the most to get it run and it is absolute painless to give it a try. There is a blog (http://blog.lxde.org/) which has nice informations about it too. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] proportion between qoutes and lines

2009-09-08 Thread Attila
a suggestion from mine. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Maximum JFS file (not filesytem) size

2009-09-08 Thread Attila
star a try: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=27135 See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] introducing kernel26-lts

2009-08-26 Thread Attila
But i think this will only works if you start kdm from the inittab ... or better to say, i don't know if this will works in the other case. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Howto adjust font scaling in Arch? All fonts look a bit big and fat?

2009-08-24 Thread Attila
the content of /etc/fonts/conf.d incl. the file ~/.fonts.conf. Perhaps this gives you the answer but it is possible too that opensuse use another (and/or other patched) version of fontconfig. Good luck, Attila

Re: [arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-13 Thread Attila
would not recommend the general use of that Me too ... but for own packages with own risk it is enough.-) Thanks again, Attila

[arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-12 Thread Attila
with the full names if this is necessary. Comment: Thanks for the pacman support of splitting PKGBUILDs. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] '*' in PKGBUILD for the conflicts array

2009-08-12 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 12. August 2009 09:52 Allan McRae wrote: No, that will not work. Perhaps in the future? If not, no problem and i don't want to force you to say me a release date.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] GNOME 2.28 - changes ahead

2009-08-11 Thread Attila
at the moment? For 'oss' i get a exception on if i click on svn entries. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Latest updates messed up kdemod3 libjpeg.so.62?

2009-07-29 Thread Attila
this could be a very hard work. So from my view using the libjpeg6 from aur would be the best compromise. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-18 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009 19:27 Florian Pritz wrote: Get the old libjpeg package, extract it and copy the .so file to /usr/lib. Linking is a no-go. The best solution for working around seems this package from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28427 See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
be the best? 1. ln -s libjpeg.so  libjpeg.so.62 or 2. Stay with libjpeg 6b-6 and do ln -s libjpeg.so libjpeg.so.7 Comment: I still use my own kde3 packages and i'm not sure that i will found patches for them in the near future (or perhaps never). See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] emacs-cvs do not run after libjpeg updated

2009-07-15 Thread Attila
packages with the news gcc ... perhaps this is the reason why searching the web for patches is not my first option.-) See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 Beta - Rocks, still a bit rough, but very usable as a primary desktop

2009-06-24 Thread Attila
On Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 17:18 David Rosenstrauch wrote: Yes, mixing KDE4 and kdemod is not OK.  But KDE4 and kdemod3 (i.e., KDE3) can be installed side-by-side. And how can this be done if kdelibs do replace arts? Have i after this kdemod3 without sound? See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] KDE4.3 Beta - Rocks, still a bit rough, but very usable as a primary desktop

2009-06-24 Thread Attila
and you'll have sound. Thanks for the info and nice to know that i have the option to test kde4 with my real hardware instead of running it in a vm. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Fix or not fix? install scriptlets with user handling.

2009-05-30 Thread Attila
. But i don't want to say that you have to change this because for a single daemon i would say that this is possible but for a combination of them as you said this is too much work for a problem who could (and should) be solved from the user. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Fix or not fix? install scriptlets with user handling.

2009-05-29 Thread Attila
that in mind. Absoulutely +1 and i say only my opinion about the same thing. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Fix or not fix? install scriptlets with user handling.

2009-05-28 Thread Attila
is safe and if a daemon needs to restart than doing this is better as doing nothing. See you, Attila

Re: [arch-general] Fix or not fix? install scriptlets with user handling.

2009-05-28 Thread Attila
incompetent to recognize why the restart of his daemon fails after the update. So therefore from my view restarting has more advantages than doing nothing. See you, Attila

  1   2   >