On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:09 PM, David Benfell
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> But in a browser it can be disastrous. I would really like it to go
> away. Google isn't helping me. And the Arch Wiki mouse articles seem
> to be leading in a different direction. Can some
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Guillaume Brunerie
> wrote:
>> 2012/8/2 Ray Kohler :
>>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Scott Weisman wrote:
I should have added more details. I am using OpenBox on an X86_64 install.
Two dif
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 12:20 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> All,
>
> Downloading the archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso from
> http://cake.lib.fit.edu/archlinux/iso/2012.07.15/, the md5sums.txt files
> shows:
>
> a40c60ce93efb9dfd9a7353310fed35a archlinux-2012.07.15-netinstall-dual.iso
>
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> With the new virtualbox update I had to obtain virtualbox version in a
> script (and of course, virtualbox binary doesn't have a sane --version
> parameter...).
>
> Anyway, its pretty simple to pacman -Qi virtualbox | grep -e
> "^Version" | awk '
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:59:02 +0530
> Jayesh Badwaik wrote:
>
>> You are very correct, master documents should always be plain text. The
>> generated documents can be binary however. Also, there should be a fallback
>> system where the plain
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've seen that I have some very old packages installed:
>
> [gleira@guillelinux ~]$ pacman -Qi|grep "Fecha de instal"|grep 2009
> Fecha de instalación : sáb 26 dic 2009 00:07:06 CET
> Fecha de instalación : mié 04 mar 2009 08:46:
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Vitor Garcia wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:37:27 +0200
> Florian Pritz wrote:
>
>> Simple tests (building readline because it's small) with -j4 and -j8
>> on my i7-920 show that -j8 is around 20% faster than -j4. IIRC
>> wikipedia states that HT core can increase
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 12:59 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> Guys,
>
> Is there any way to check the number of cores on a machine to set the number
> of jobs within a PKGBUILD?:
>
> make -j'X'
>
> I have some dual-core and some quad-core boxes and the difference between -j2
> and -j4 on build time i
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 19/03/12 13:40, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> somtimes the installed size information is simply wrong.e
>>
>> $ pacman -Si thunderbird
>> Repository : extra
>> Name
hi,
somtimes the installed size information is simply wrong.e
$ pacman -Si thunderbird
Repository : extra
Name : thunderbird
Version: 11.0-1
..
Download Size : 15409.89 KiB
Installed Size : 7968.00 KiB
Architecture : x86_64
$ xz -l thunderbird-11.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.x
2012/3/18 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
> 2012/3/18 Auguste Pop :
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:01:52 +0800
>>>> 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>>&g
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:01:52 +0800
>> 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
>>> > I see, I just upgrade
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 07:01:52 +0800
> 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>
>> 2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
>> > I see, I just upgraded to 1.4.8 on 14 Feb 2012, The log must be
>> > generated by an former version of cronie. Now it seems all gone, an
2012/2/22 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) :
> 2012/2/22 Allan McRae :
>> On 22/02/12 12:24, 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) wrote:
>>> Due to /var/run now is a tmp filesystem, so the path /var/run/* should
>>> not be packaged anymore. Instead, rc.script should take care aware
>>> create needed /var/run stuff. Otherwise, t
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Alex Liu wrote:
> However, there exists a bottom posting script for Greasemonkey if you
> want to check that out.
> http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/35866
> An according lab feature has been suggested some time ago in the Gmail
> group, but as of no there has b
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Alex Ferrando wrote:
> On 21/11/11 01:46, Myra Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Caveats first:
>>
>> I know the package I'm referring to is from the aur -- the linux-pf
>> kernel.
>> I'm asking here rather than file a needless bug report for someone to have
>> to squash.
>> I a
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:24 PM, clemens fischer
wrote:
> On Tue-2011/10/25-14:56 clemens fischer wrote:
>
>> My system broke with udev-174-1. I have rules renaming eth* according
>> to their MACs for consistency, guarding against dependency on
>> order-of-detection, plus rules to customize a wla
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:48 PM, XeCycle wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> I found the package `emacs-goodies-el' quite useful when I was using
> Ubuntu, but Arch doesn't seem to have a equivalent package. I know I
> can install them myself, but it may be better to pack some of the most
> used into one p
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:33 PM, XeCycle wrote:
> Hi, I build Emacs from git quite frequently, about twice a month or so.
> However the PKGBUILD from AUR rebuilds everything each time, which takes
> too many time I think. Perhaps Emacs is small, but I think there should
> be a way to prevent too
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
wrote:
> On 08/27/2011 12:42 AM, Madhurya Kakati wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> My system tends to slow down a lot when I copy files to and from a pen
>> drive or even from one hard disk to another. Even my mouse cursor
>> slows down. The system becomes
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Samuel Baldwin
wrote:
> The topic says it all. I recently pacman -Syu'd and firefox has
> refused to start after this. I've tried rolling back to firefox 4 (and
> xulrunner 2) but I just get an error about XPCOM not loading.
>
> Trying to start firefox 6 just yield
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 5:10 PM, Joker-jar wrote:
> What you think about it? Or create additional package with this script, that
> depend from uml_utilities
>
what does it do? virtualbox is capable of creating bridged network
interfaces, as well as nat, host-only ones. and it is not an upstream
scr
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Philipp Überbacher
wrote:
> Excerpts from Auguste Pop's message of 2011-08-03 15:12:21 +0200:
>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos
>> wrote:
>> > On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> I'm aware that recently there has been so
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Wed, 3 Aug 2011 21:10:53 +0800
> schrieb Auguste Pop :
>
>> i thought there was a choosing phase before actually install a
>> language pack when upgrading. the default choice is alphabetically the
>> first, which
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Mauro Santos wrote:
> On 03-08-2011 07:41, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
>> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
>> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:09:06 +0200
> schrieb Jan de Groot :
>
>> As pacman will happily install multiple replacement packages, I would
>> suggest removing the provides= line from libreoffice-common and adding
>> replaces=libreoffice to the split
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Guillermo Leira wrote:
> If you run pacman -Ss libreoffice, you see that there seems to be a
> libreoffice group. But when you run pacman -S libreoffice, only
> libreoffice-common is installed...
>
i guess that's because libreoffice-common provides libreoffice. tr
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Hector Martinez-Seara wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm aware that recently there has been some changes in libreoffice
> package. The problem is that yesterday I updated my system and
> surprisingly only libreoffice-common was updated. By that I mean that
> I mean that not base, w
hi,
the binaray version of java has been in repo with the name jre and jdk
for a long time. i noticed that a split package of java-sun is now in
the community repo.
i don't know if java-sun is newly created or has been there also for a
long time. anyway, the -sun suffix is not appropriate as the
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:12 PM, Ionut Biru wrote:
> I've been criticized a lot because I choose poorly the name for guest
> additions.
>
> Right now the packages are like this:
>
> virtualbox-addtitions - contains the iso with guest additions for
> linux/windows/etc and is installed on host
> vi
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 12:09 PM, XeCycle wrote:
> Auguste Pop writes:
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:36 PM, XeCycle wrote:
>>> I need the documents of octave, but it's not in the current octave
>>> package, so I need to compile it manually after each upda
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:36 PM, XeCycle wrote:
> I need the documents of octave, but it's not in the current octave
> package, so I need to compile it manually after each update. However
> the compilation is very time and power consuming, it can drive my CPU to
> 100 degrees --- which is not ve
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> No. I was saying that only load-modules.sh/initscripts should parse
> the MODULES array directly (Oon-ee was suggesting that udev rules
> might rely on the MODULES array).
>
> Once we make this change, then blacklisting in rc.conf will become
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> I have not found any uses of the MODULES array like you describe (if
> they exist they should be considered bugs though, the MODULES array
> was not meant to be used in this way). However, if anyone knows of
> any, then please let me know.
>
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Bernardo Barros
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> There are rumors that the next version number of the Linux Kernel is
> going to be 3.0.
> Since we choosed 'kernel26' as the package name, we will have to
> modify it anyway.
> Why not just 'linux 3.0'? Just an idea.. since w
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> i wrote a very simple rc.d bash completion script. is there any chance
>> it can be used upstream?
>
> Thanks for your work!
>
> If you make a git patch (
i wrote a very simple rc.d bash completion script. is there any chance
it can be used upstream?
the script is uploaded to http://paste.pocoo.org/show/391283/
it is also copy-pasted here for your convenience:
#!/bin/bash
_rc.d_getdaemons ()
{
/usr/bin/find "$1" -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 -type
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Filip Filipov
wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 01:40, Steve Holmes wrote:
>
> in the gnomeShell cheat sheet[1] it is only written "Most keybindings can be
> viewed under the User Menu -> System Settings -> Keyboard -> Shortcuts",
> although I don't know what they c
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:38 AM, David C. Rankin
wrote:
> guys,
>
> I think the nautilus INSTALL file has a problem. The latest update resulted
> in:
>
> (3/3) upgrading nautilus [###] 100%
> /tmp/alpm_1J0ybD/.INSTALL: line 4: gtk-update-icon-cache: command not
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> Yaro Kasear wrote:
> > On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 20:45:32 Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
> >> This feature request: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23747
> >>
> >>
> >> Greg
> >
> > Is this some sort of configuration utility for Xorg?
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Dennis Beekman wrote:
> I suspected as much when both packages seemed to work :-)
> but can we change the Libre Office packages to depend upon JRE instead ?
> Openjdk6 is missing a lot of functionality such as browser support, JRE
> would be a better choice..
>
b
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Piyush P Kurur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 05:57:02PM +0800, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>
>> by gmail, do you mean the gmail web interface or the gmail mail
>> service?
>
&g
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 4:49 PM, SanskritFritz
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Matthew Gyurgyik wrote:
>>
>>> 2. Next time, please create a new mail, instead of replying to an existing
>>> thread and changing the topic
>>>
>>
>> W
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Jan de Groot wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 12:06 +0800, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> relinking python is a bad idea, but imho, explicitly envoking python3
>> when packaging it not.
>> using python to install python3 packages is like linking to
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> On 11/04/11 10:48, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Aaron DeVore
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I recently started creating/maintaining packages for the AUR. One
>>> request I've run up against is allowing users to relink
>>> /usr/bi
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 04/10/2011 07:04 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
>>>
>>> Or you could just save yourself the hassle and just switch over to
>>> XFCE, awesomewm, the
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> Or you could just save yourself the hassle and just switch over to
> XFCE, awesomewm, the possibilities are endless. More productive than
> pining over a DE that's now officially dead (dying).
>
xfce depends on gtk2. when gnome3 hits the repo, i
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote:
> I installed vim-peaksea from the AUR the other day and couldn't use
> it, because it installed in /usr/share/vim/colors/peaksea.vim. This
> seems a fairly standard directory, but its not in runtimepath on a
> fresh install (AFAIK).
>
> Checked out
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:00 PM, Wieland Hoffmann
wrote:
> On 30.03.2011 16:16, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> If you already have wavpack installed, simply recompile the package
>> from abs would have wavpack support included.
>
> But it wouldn't depend on "wavpack&qu
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Kyle wrote:
> Having recently migrated from Ubuntu, I notice that while Ubuntu's Sox
> package didn't support encoding to mp3, it did support Wavpack encoding and
> decoding, whereas in Arch, it supports mp3 encoding, but Wavpack seems to be
> unsupported. Am I mis
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:34 PM, John Albright wrote:
> Hello. I just installed Arch last weekend and have gotten KDE and
> NetworkManager installed. I'm able to connect to unprotected and
> WPA-protected wireless networks, but when I try to use a WEP-protected one,
> the NetworkManager applet ke
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:58 AM, 郑文辉 wrote:
> Hey,guys
>
> I have several thoughts about perl packages packing standards.
>
> First,It seems to me that renaming spamassassin to
> perl-mail-spamassassin which following the cpan perl packages naming
> standard is better.May be we can add a feature t
2011/2/27 Sebastian Köhler :
> On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 07:04:11 +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> You would have got a message about a pacsave file being created.
>
> Which I responded to with a "mv /etc/sylog-ng.conf.pacsave
> /etc/syslog-ng.conf"
> because there was no indication that the conf file is
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I'm using arch on an old laptop with only 128MB RAM. I had problems
> compressing the initcpio image with lzma, it always failed allocating
> memory. The following one-line patch allowed me to set my own compression
> l
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> --- /sbin/mkinitcpio.orig 2010-10-06 03:23:00.966415649 +0300
> +++ /sbin/mkinitcpio 2011-02-26 19:11:36.309682053 +0200
> @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
> status=0
> if [ -n "${GENIMG}" ]; then
> echo -n ":: Generating image '${GE
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 12:41 PM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
>> of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
>>
Hi,
I am not aware of the package until I saw it listed on the home page
of Archlinux today. Just out of curiosity, I skimmed the contents of
the package and find out that they are mainly html files. Shouldn't it
be "any" rather than i686/x86_64? Should I file a bug report or this
is just my ignor
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 16:43, John K Pate wrote:
>>
>>> > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=systemd&do_Search=Go
>>>
>>> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?O=0&K=systemd-arch-units-git&do_Search=Go
>>>
>>
>> http://aur.archlinux.org/pa
Hi,
The ibus-table package in community repository has several "python2
fix" sed lines in PKGBUILD. However, the dependency of ibus-table
includes python-pyenchant, which is a python3 package. Should we
change the dependency into python2-pyenchant?
Thank you for your attention.
Best Regards,
Hi,
LZO compression has quicker compression and bigger compressed file. As
the kernel load time is the sum of the time loading the compressed
image and the time of decompressing the image, I am not sure if LZO
compression is better than traditional gzip compression on a i686 or
x86_64 system where
the package you mentioned is orphaned and marked out-of-date. i think
you can simply adopt and update it. change the PYTHON variable in
Makefile to python2 and several shebang lines in .py files may solve
the breakage. of course, you need to change the dependency from python
to python2.
> Date: Fr
thon3 thoughts
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Message-ID: <4cdce8bc.4080...@isaac.cedarswampstudios.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> On 11/12/10 01:51, Auguste Pop wrote:
>> ...
>> I hope python3 won't die this way,
Hi,
Firstly, I want to state clearly that I am 100% supportive to the
python3 transition which took part in Archlinux a month ago.
I installed libreoffice from extra today to replace go-openoffice. And
all of a sudden, python is no longer required by any package at all. I
checked the dependencies
Thank you for pointing out the slash thing for me. I was not aware of
this. The updated files are cat below.
Best Regards,
$ cat PKGBUILD
# Contributor: Jason Chu
# Contributor: Tom Newsom
# Contributor: Auguste
pkgname=xboard
pkgver=4.4.4
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A graphical user interfaces for che
oard long outdated, new pkgbuild
> attached
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 5 November 2010 03:21, Auguste Pop wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The xboard package in
Hi,
The xboard package in extra has been long outdated and orphaned. I
have attached my own PKGBUILD which includes an .desktop file to ease
the use.
Can any maintainer just update it?
Thank you for your kind attention.
Best Regards,
;iso-8859-15"
>
> Am 21.10.2010 13:38, schrieb Auguste Pop:
>> For instance,
>> /usr/lib/evince/3/backends/libdjvudocument.so from evince package
>> links to /usr/lib/libdjvulibre.so.21, which would be removed if I
>> update the system to allow djvulibre to replace
Hi,
The package djvulibre now conflicts and provides libdjvu, and libdjvu
disappeared from the repository.
However, judging by the files they provide and the PKGBUILD cached in
my abs directory, I don't think they are the same thing. djvulibre
does not provide the dynamic linked library as libdjv
y is sage-mathematics so huge?
> To: General Discussion about Arch Linux
> Message-ID:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Auguste Pop wrote:
>>> Hi,
&
Hi,
I just noticed that there is a sage-mathematics package in community
repository and tried to install it and found out that the package is
really huge.
I understand that sage is always shipped in a gigantic bundle, but the
arch package is considerably larger than official packages provided
for
i tried to add myself into the sudo group to avoid possible future
problems and found out that sudo group does not even exist.
i will just ignore this and keep granting sudoer privilege by user.
after a recent update, i found out that telepathy-butterfly is broken.
/usr/lib/telepathy/telepathy-butterfly, running manually from a
console, complains about requiring papyon >= 0.5.0, while to he
package state it requires papyon >= 0.4.9. but there is NO papyon
0.5.0 out there according to the
Hi,
I am new to archlinux and just tried to install xboard this afternoon
and found out that the package is labeled orphan. I updated the
PKGBUILD (attached) and made a successful installation. Any TU would
like to adopt the package? The difference between the original
PKGBUILD and my PKGBUILD is
73 matches
Mail list logo
