yuck.
if you just want to manage daemons running as your own user, su and
sudo shouldn't even be involved.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:05:35 +0100
Owain Sutton m...@owainsutton.co.uk wrote:
How about using /etc/rc.d/ scripts with 'su user' to start the
program as the relevant user (as per the
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:30:42 +0930
Ty ty...@eye-of-odin.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011, at 7:39 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
yuck.
if you just want to manage daemons running as your own user, su and
sudo shouldn't even be involved.
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:05:35 +0100
Owain Sutton m
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:19:47 +0700
An Nguyen an.nguyen.f...@gmail.com wrote:
Try these guys
supervisord
daemontools
:-)
those look neat. I wonder how they compare to each other and to
systemd (which is designed to deal with system- and user level
daemons as well)
Dieter
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 10:55:35 +0200
Philipp Überbacher hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Tom Gundersen's message of 2011-06-11 02:22:56 +0200:
Hi Magnus,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org
wrote:
1. As I read it, it's only blacklisting
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 10:53:31 +0300
Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 04/22/2011 07:23 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 21 Apr 2011 21:07:35 -0400
schrieb Kaiting Chenkaitocr...@gmail.com:
First of all the cronie in [community-testing] is compiled with
--enable-anacron. It installs
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 23:16:46 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
cron daemon, but no need for a default cron daemon. It's pretty the
same issue as with
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:45:29 -0400
Kaiting Chen kaitocr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On the other hand this issue could be solved in a different way
without any further discussions. There's a need for installing one
On Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:22:14 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that Arch would benefit from inducing SELinux as an option
because it expands the venues available for Arch Linux systems, I
also think that inclusion in base of SELinux requires a minimal
amount of maintenance
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 20:23:21 -0400
Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
Hey all,
A heads up for anyone using systemd, I've just pushed the latest tag
to [community-testing]. It's going to be hanging out there until we at
least see udev-167. More notably, there's been a fairly silly change
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:06:57 -0400
David Campbell davek...@archlinux.us wrote:
Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of 2011-03-27 10:01:35 -0400:
If I want to support GPT I will need decent utilities from upstream.
I know about parted and sgdisk but I need a toolset for:
- interactive
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 13:17:02 +0530
KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I wanted to share my views on this whole discussion. Many
people don't know the actual features and problems with individual
boot-loaders.
GRUB-Legacy
- Kinda KISS (actually syslinux is more KISS)
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:31:13 +0530
KESHAV P.R. skodab...@gmail.com wrote:
This is really question about users who do not care about what
bootloader they have in their system and simply select the 1st one in
the menu. Especially true in case of newbies (most of them).
I don't care if users
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 16:40:58 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
We used to have lots of patches in the kernel (between 5 and 15), so a
single -ARCH patch was created.
Now, the number of patches is fairly small and I am thinking maybe we
should go back to single patches.
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:07:02 +0100
Cédric Girard girard.ced...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
The mailinglist was down also, so reporting it here doesn't help that
much.
Understood. Won't do it again. ;-)
is that the
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:58:19 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
But regardless, this should support the Arch style runlevel.
maybe... in theory it's possible that in a month we switch to systemd as
official init system. this will probably not happen (soon), but just
saying.
I do
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:26:08 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.bewrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 10:58:19 -0600
Thomas S Hatch thatc...@gmail.com wrote:
But regardless, this should support the Arch style
On Thu, 3 Mar 2011 10:36:51 +0100
didier gaumet didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
The one reason of this problem I can think of is that being
absent-minded, I forgot about somehow failing to upgrade properly to
2.6.37 after having *successfully* installed 2.6.33 from the iso.
Please guys
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 20:16:22 +0100
didier gaumet didier.gau...@gmail.com wrote:
What puzzles me is to
find a 2.6.37 kernel installed by this image: if I am not wrong, 2.6.37
was out in 2011.01, eight months after the 2010.05 iso was out...
did you do a netinstall? that fetches the latest
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:58:23 +0100
Tom Willemsen tom.willem...@archlinux.us wrote:
well I think it would be best to have a table that shows for each value of
each criterion, the last succesful state (if known)
so, for example:
criterion last known state
Arch:
- i686
Hey Tom, what's the status?
If you have any questions, just let me know how I can help.
If you're not interested anymore, then let me know also, then I can search for
someone else :)
Dieter
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 20:44:22 +0100
Tom Willemsen tom.willem...@archlinux.us wrote:
Hey Dieter,
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 05:56:47PM +0100, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hey Tom, what's the status?
I'm very sorry, I haven't been able to get to it yet, I've only been
able to look at how django
anyone ever looked at http://netconf.alioth.debian.org/ ?
looks interesting. I know a bunch of us are working on network management
tools (like netcfg and replacements for it), but that one seems to have a good
philosophy and should be distro independent.
Dieter
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:47:51 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 10.02.2011 10:39, schrieb Tom Willemsen:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:40:24PM -0500, Kaiting Chen wrote:
Hey I might be able to do it. But it's not going to look pretty
because I'm not a designer. --Kaiting.
Note that I've been talking with Tom on Fosdem, and we already
privately mailed about this.
In a mail he asked why not let AIF create a textfile
automatically, then just submit that textfile to the webapp?
I think that's a good idea:
- less manual work for the user.
- no webform needed (but we
I gave an AIF (related) talk at Fosdem this year.
For more info, video and slides:
http://dieter.plaetinck.be/can_we_build_a_simple_cross-distribution_installation_framework.html
Dieter
Hi,
for Arch releng, we have recently started automatically building test builds
(http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/). These images are built from the archiso
and aif git repositories, and the current state of the repos.
The idea is that people can test these images, and once in a while, I will
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:21:28 +0200
Ionuț Bîru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 01/25/2011 11:14 PM, Jesse Juhani Jaara wrote:
ti, 2011-01-25 kello 22:13 +0100, Grzegorz Rumiński kirjoitti:
Hi lads,
Can I selectively install apackage from [testing] repo or do I
have to uncomment it in
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:12:06 +
Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org wrote:
It seems to be that
either someone uploads their entire addressbook to a random website
(doesn't seem like a clever idea) or else gives the website their
email password (very bad idea).
It's probably the easiest
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:32:16 +
Mauro Santos registo.maill...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess they do (or they should, never tried it myself) and I also
believe that they ask for the email's password before they can spam
mail everyone.
To add insult to injury some sites require (or used to
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:16:34 +0100
Jan Steffens jan.steff...@gmail.com wrote:
Arch's init system is completely ignorant of dependencies.
Depends on how you look at it, I guess.
I see the explicit ordering and backgrounding of daemons (done by the
user) in rc.conf as a (very crude) form of
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 13:20:58 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 19.01.2011 08:08, schrieb Allan McRae:
If we want to be really pedantic about dependencies, we should list
_ALL_ dependencies and not remove the ones that are dependencies of
dependencies.
Why don't we just
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:25:34 +1030
Ty John (sand_man) ty...@eye-of-odin.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 08:46 +, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
LinkedIn
General,
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
LOL major fail
Captain awesome!
Dieter
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:52:03 -0500
Matthew Gyurgyik pyt...@pyther.net wrote:
Hello Community,
Over the last few weeks I have been working on Syslinux support for
the installer. With the help Thomas and Dieter I am nearing the
completion of this project. As part of this project, I have
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:29:59 -0500
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm happy to announce that after a far-too-long wait, the latest
version of pkgtools is released! This version is a complete rewrite
from the ground up. The slow parts have been rewritten in C for a huge
while testing new images, I get this:
http://users.edpnet.be/dieter/vbox-or-kernel-or-mkinitcpio-bug.png
the error messages show up in google results and seem to be bugs in the
Linux swap code and/or drivers.
interestingly, at first aif/dialog/mkinitcpio/find just keep running,
but after a while
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:46:24 +0100
Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
while testing new images, I get this:
http://users.edpnet.be/dieter/vbox-or-kernel-or-mkinitcpio-bug.png
the error messages show up in google results and seem to be bugs in
the Linux swap code and/or drivers
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:56:24 -0500
Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com wrote:
I highly doubt that this was _ever_ a question of size in the repos.
More likely, It's a matter of time vs. gain for a small number of
volunteers. If you're a user who knows that they want a particular
exotic filesystem
On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 01:10:12 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
The problem is: If blkid finds more than one valid signature, it will
not return anything, and we will mistakenly believe that there is no
file system (and happily overwrite the drive). This part of
initscripts is
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:30:03 +0100
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Also the netinstall iso can only install from [core] as
far as I know.
not entirely correct, but that would be off-topic.
But on the other hand every filesystem related package has to be
removed from (base), while
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 15:06:10 -0500
Matthew Gyurgyik pyt...@pyther.net wrote:
Hello
I want to add extlinux support in AIF. However, unlike grub, where
grub-install takes care of everything, extlinux
requires /boot/syslinux to be created and some files
from /usr/lib/syslinux to be copied to
FWIW:
I've gone through the archives and found multiple threads about our
cron discussions.
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-September/
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-January
(esp.
On Tue, 02 Nov 2010 10:54:43 -0400
David Rosenstrauch dar...@darose.net wrote:
I work near Penn Station.
Let's take this off-list.
DR
Allright, cool that there are some people interested in meeting up!
I will contact you guys off-list.
If anyone else would like to join some fellow
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:24:36 -0500
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Guys,
For those that rely on OpenOffice, and for those that prepare
the packages, it's official, OpenOffice forked as of Sept. 28, 2010.
Here is the press release:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 12:20:29 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:05 PM, 甘露(Gan Lu) rhythm@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Mike Sampson m...@sambodata.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:28 PM, jesse jaara
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:44:52 +0200
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Latest kernel is in testing,
please signoff for both arches.
greetings
tpowa
Signoff i686 lvm/encrypt
this kernel fixes Alan's[1] big sata_sil breakage, making my system boot
again. ( see
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 16:07:30 +0200
Lukas Fleischer archli...@cryptocrack.de wrote:
Anyway, whats the rush? They will change eventually. There should
be no (or very few) $startdir/{src,pkg} in [core].
As I already said at the beginning:
Although this isn't really significant... I was
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 16:01:43 -0500
C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Philipp Überbacher
hollun...@lavabit.com wrote:
Excerpts from Dieter Plaetinck's message of 2010-09-08 21:47:40
+0200:
anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
anyone knows this? http://bugseverywhere.org/be/show/HomePage
the concept looks great, although i don't know anything about the
implementation/usage.
other then the advantages they list, I think something like this can be
useful for downstream-upstream communication. (ie someone reports a
bug in
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:52:12 +0800 (CST)
大熊 bear_...@163.com wrote:
I use xbindkeys under kde4 (start xbindkeys with kde's autorun), add
some hotkeys: win+a, win+c, win+h, win+j, ... When kde4.4, All are OK.
Few days ago I upgraded to kde4.5 , So something is wrong: When I
just enter desktop,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:02:43 +1100
joker-...@yandex.ru joker-...@yandex.ru wrote:
What do you think about it? Need to be in Arch?
During booting before starting daemons appears message:
Press I to enter interactive boot mode
Interactive boot allows to select action for each daemon
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:43:03 +0300
jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/3 Martín Cigorraga martosurf7...@gmail.com
Hi,
is possible to image my current Arch system into a USB pendrive and
use it from there?
Many thanks!
Martín
It is possible you will have to
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:00:09 -0500
David C. Rankin drankina...@suddenlinkmail.com wrote:
Well sometimes the stupid ones among us don't always catch
that dovecot is being updated when it is one of 73+ updates that take
place. But we 'do' always catch the failure to copy to sent --
later
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/3 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org
One way to solve it would be to add a fourth set of credentials :-)
For instance OpenID.
I never understood why there is a need for openid when there are client
ssl
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:58:15 +0100
Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 09:35, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be
wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:23:49 +0300
jesse jaara jesse.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/3 Magnus Therning mag...@therning.org
One way
On Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:58:00 +0200, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved
On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:08:50 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:31:47 +0200
schrieb Pierre Chapuis catw...@archlinux.us:
Just for information, the opposite point of view recently came up on
the suckless mailing-list:
On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 15:47:24 -0700
Alex Matviychuk alex...@gmail.com wrote:
I just spent some time setting up my new laptop with an SSD to use
NILFS2 as its root filesystem and I'm very pleased with the
performance.
In an effort to get better support for NILFS2 in arch I've added a
request
On Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:46:33 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
I don't think that nilfs-utils should be moved to the base group. I
agree with moving it to [core] but not to base, because base is
assumed to be installed on every computer and packages in the base
group are usually
fwiw in AIF I do something similar (see
http://github.com/Dieterbe/aif/blob/master/src/core/libs/lib-blockdevices-filesystems.sh#L457)
(but there i use a text file containing all mountpoints)
The interesting thing is, to find the order in which you should mount
or (or umount) blockdevices can be
So, what?
we better include ppp and not wvdial?
Dieter
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:16:58 +0800
Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2010 17:35, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
So, what?
we better include ppp and not wvdial?
No, it will definitely help if it's included - you just have to make
an exception and try to fit
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:22:39 -0600
jwbirdsong jwbirds...@jwbirdsong.homelinux.com wrote:
On 06/25/2010 11:54 PM, Nilesh Govindarajan wrote:
Hi,
Recently I've been going to my friends' house and installing arch
on their boxes. Some of them had high speed wireless dialup
internet (3.1
On Sat, 22 May 2010 02:04:41 +0200
Andre \Osku\ Schmidt andre.osku.schm...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:56 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:41:12 +0200
Andre \Osku\ Schmidt andre.osku.schm...@googlemail.com wrote:
just gives me
On Sat, 22 May 2010 12:51:39 +0200
Andre \Osku\ Schmidt andre.osku.schm...@googlemail.com wrote:
now i only wonder what would be the best way and place to save these
variables in the installed system ?
are you saying the target system should always use the proxies, for all
users?
maybe write
On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:19:18 +0200
Andre \Osku\ Schmidt andre.osku.schm...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello Arch,
is anyone using the arch installer with squid proxy ?
(or any other cache proxy)
i'm again so close my goal that it makes me nervous :)
- squid installed on the host machine,
On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:41:12 +0200
Andre \Osku\ Schmidt andre.osku.schm...@googlemail.com wrote:
just gives me the usage info, without any
errors... and also the Invalid URL scheme errors that i see in
tty7 are nowhere to find in /var/log/*
what i would do in a case like this is just
On Mon, 17 May 2010 00:25:24 +0200
Dries De Smet driesdes...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry if I caused anyone work over this, but I must have been
sleepy, I saw the link to the images, downloaded the first netinstall
I saw tested it, not realising it was the new image, but the one
from april
On Mon, 17 May 2010 23:55:57 +0200
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 17.05.2010 23:36, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 05:17:28PM +0200, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka final final images ;))
in which this should be fixed
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
Michael Towers larc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet driesdes...@gmail.com:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
HA, from usb stick, everything went fine. Just didn't detect
wireless with kernel 2.6.32, but
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:41:39 +0200
Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Sun, 16 May 2010 10:22:30 +0200
Michael Towers larc...@googlemail.com wrote:
2010/5/15 Dries De Smet driesdes...@gmail.com:
archlinux-2010.05.13-netinstall-i686.iso , installed on asus 1005
HA, from usb
Okay guys,
props to Thomas for finding out the problem with the initialization of
wireless cards.
I built new images, dated 2010.05.16 (aka final final images ;)) in
which this should be fixed, and which also come with updated core
packages, most notably kernel26-2.6.33.4-1
On Sun, 16 May 2010 23:28:24 +0800
Ng Oon-Ee ngoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Would like to help testing it out, but my weekend internet (home
connection) sucks, and by the time I get into the office it may be
done already. In any case, if that doesn't happen I'll try to get the
last two things
On Sun, 16 May 2010 20:12:32 +0200
Karol Babioch ka...@babioch.de wrote:
On Sunday 16 May 2010 17:17:28 Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
So right now, these two things are needed:
* confirmation that archlinux-2010.05.16-core-x86_64.iso boots fine.
* confirmation that wireless cards are properly
On Sat, 15 May 2010 10:04:40 +0300
Dmitry Korzhevin dkorzhe...@lsupport.net wrote:
14.05.2010 18:16, Dieter Plaetinck пишет:
new images are done.
version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos
new images are done.
version: 2010.05.13
these are the images I want to rename to an official 2010.05 release
after testing.
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/Changelog
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
how should they be tested?
for every file, that is:
archlinux-2010.05.13-core-dual.iso
On Sat, 08 May 2010 11:50:27 +0200
Mathieu Pasquet mathieu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/05/2010 21:53, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for
installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install.
I second that. I have met someone
On Fri, 7 May 2010 08:42:39 +0300
Nick Stepa hired...@gmail.com wrote:
Archlinux have rolling releases. You can use *netinstall*.iso for
installing new software or just do `pacman -Syu` after install.
updated images are good for support of new hardware, filesystems, ..
Dieter
On Sun, 02 May 2010 17:49:13 +0200
Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
This new kernel just exports some additional symbols for aufs2 which
was updated to a new snapshot. This should hopefully fix some issues
with the .33 kernel and aufs. Related aufs packages are: aufs2
On Wed, 5 May 2010 18:49:44 -0500
C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
any other ideas besides rollbacks and an original snapshot that btrfs
could be used for?
IIRC it supports data checksumming.
about the whole snapshot/volume naming thing: do what you think is best.
i cannot advise
in my opinion we need to let AIF/etc. integration mature along with
the FS itself. this way when BTRFS is marked stable the tools will
be ready as well and it will be a minor transition.
I could not say it better myself.
It always takes a while until the 'experimental' flag is removed in the
On Sun, 02 May 2010 12:55:19 +0200
Sven-Hendrik Haase s...@lutzhaase.com wrote:
On 02.05.2010 12:37, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/05/10 20:33, Caleb Cushing wrote:
why is it the new iso's never made the download page?
Because they were testing builds and never released...
Allan
Come
release team currently that means me.
yes, i'm working on new images.
see:
http://build.archlinux.org/isos/
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/2010-March/thread.html
progress is rather slow, but there is not so much work anymore, so
they'll come..
Dieter
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:12:15 +0200
Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote:
Am Fri, 2 Apr 2010 19:57:10 +0200
schrieb Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be:
well, if you use the old 2009.8 images which has the old aif, it
will indeed give problems when you install the latest packages
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 22:21:11 +0200
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
I have another question. The next installs will be 3 clones:
identical HW, same packages and configuration, they will run
the same SW at the same time (three audio computation servers,
each taking care of 64 channels). Is there any
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 18:38:34 +0200
f...@kokkinizita.net wrote:
Hello all,
I wanted to do a new install today, using netinstall
on an USB stick which has worked at least 5 times
before, the last time less than two weeks ago.
Things failed in the 'Configure System' phase, seems
I didn't
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:49:36 +
Damien Churchill dam...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2010 10:56, Damien Churchill dam...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2010 10:54, Ionut Biru biru.io...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/12/2010 12:51 PM, Damien Churchill wrote:
I was just wondering if there are
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:17:07 +
Damien Churchill dam...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2010 12:14, Dieter Plaetinck die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
you can also build your own iso's using archiso.
it's pretty easy, although you need archiso from git and you must
let it look in a repository
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:57:46 -0600
Dan McGee dpmc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:29 AM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
you could also try a netinstall cd and enable the testing repository
in /tmp/pacman.conf. IIRC aif (the installer) uses pacman
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 18:04:50 -0600
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with everyone else that's said it. This comes up often enough
but no one ever has a good workflow that works. I have seen nothing
proposed in this thread that is good. The ONLY thing gained is oh
neat, it's
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi vmlinuz...@yahoo.com.ar wrote:
In few days, I will start a new caeer math professor, I am really
very happy because it's something I always wanted to study, and
beyond that, I really like teaching.
Besides, I work as a teacher in a
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:33:16 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
So you want to do a templated installation something like that of
kickstart availalbe in Fedora, Redhat and CentOS.
It is possible using Arch Installation Framework but it is under
development and not meant for
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 23:07:07 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 22:33:16 +0530
Nilesh Govindarajan li...@itech7.com wrote:
So you want to do a templated installation something
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 21:18:26 +0800
Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/03/2010, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.de wrote:
Am Sonntag, 7. März 2010 12:03:08 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
2) svn-git migration is not trivial, since tools, the website, ..
will need to be adapted
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 14:49:01 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
1) We want to be able to see which PKGBUILD matches the package in the
repository. In SVN, we use copy - which is subversion's equivalent to
branching: By copying, you create a reference and all history of the
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:12:10 +0100
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys, i'm just trying to get grub2 support in archboot's setup.
Now i have found an irritating thing it seems it doesn't like xfs
and the ususal xfs_freeze hack
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:43:34 +0100
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010 22:12:10 +0100
Tobias Powalowski t.p...@gmx.de wrote:
Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Tobias Powalowski:
Hi guys, i'm just trying to get
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:02:53 -0600
Aaron Griffin aaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Dieter Plaetinck
die...@plaetinck.be wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:18:28 +0100
Jan de Groot j...@jgc.homeip.net wrote:
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:21 +0100, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
Just poked around with grub2 and kvm,
you really need the extra space, else it will fail to install.
creating partitions with cfdisk will also leave this
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 15:16:01 -0500
Daenyth Blank daenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 15:12, Evangelos Foutras
foutre...@gmail.com wrote:
For example, in a PKGBUILD I would write ${pkgname}_$pkgver,
because _ can be part of a variable name, but I'd much rather
prefer to
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:11:01 +0100
Thomas Bächler tho...@archlinux.org wrote:
Am 13.02.2010 21:57, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck:
For example, in a PKGBUILD I would write ${pkgname}_$pkgver,
because _ can be part of a variable name, but I'd much rather
prefer to use $pkgname-$pkgver, since
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
