[arch-general] pacman question - missing files (repost)

(Reposting in plain text - so sorry - been using thunderbird which automatically does that for mail lists - now with it's impending demise I am trying other mailers - like evolution ... ) I've seen this behavior a couple of times now. Here's what happened today. After installing systemd and

Re: [arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 20:05 +0200, Bruno Pagani wrote: > Le 08/06/2016 à 20:03, Genes Lists via arch-general a écrit : > > > When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous > > kernel > > ... > > That’s expected, and in fact the same thing happens

[arch-general] DKMS question around removal of kernel modules

When I install a new kernel, I notice that DKMS removes previous kernel modules as well as adding them to the new kernel. In the real old days these were not removed at all - so removal is a good thing. The issue is that the old kernel is still running and until machine is rebooted the modules

Re: [arch-general] [pacman-dev] Please make the colourised output exactly like that of "pacman-color"

On 03/24/2016 09:06 PM, Xavion wrote: Hi Allan, I have become old and grumpy since then! .. Quick comment on color - it might be helpful to have a toggle to switch from dark to light terminals. ls uses an environment variable to permit changing the color map - that may be overkill - but

Re: [arch-general] NOTE: Intel users: don't install lastest Xorg 1.18.2 update. Whole desktop freeze after while of using.

On 03/13/2016 08:34 AM, David Strobach wrote: ... I was affected serious issue from lastest Xorg update 1.18.2 (current in testing). Whole desktop freeze. Keyboard and mouse not working. Only pressing while power btn shutdown device. Reverting to 1.18.1 is safe. ... I confirm I have the same

Re: [arch-general] Yahoo mail problems (was [aur-general] No notification for out-of-date package)

This may be part of the problem. The arch mail server is passing thru contributers DKIM signatures leading to list mail being DKIM invalid. You domain has DKIM signed mail and therefore suffers this problem For example, looking at your last message. The message from you to the list is DKIM

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

Fixed in 4.4-3 - thank you Tobias! gene

[arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

There is a bug with the PKGFILE which is too aggressive copying files with names containing Kconfig. Consequence is upon install attempt: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) /usr/lib/modules/4.4.0-1-ARCH/build/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 exists in both

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

Work around for users is just to ignore the bad package until its fixed: pacman -Syu --ignore linux-docs g

Re: [arch-general] linux 4.4 bad package - wont install

FYI - same problem with linux-docs-4.4-2-x86_64 package.

Re: [arch-general] Firefox without signature checking

On 01/02/2016 03:32 PM, Ben Oliver wrote: On 2 January 2016 at 20:17, Kyle Terrien wrote: This sounds like something for the AUR. I do not agree with this move from Mozilla and it would be interesting to see the interest in such a package. Agree - AUR. Arch

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] PHP 7

On 12/31/2015 04:42 PM, Sebastiaan Lokhorst wrote: Make sure the following lines in /etc/php/php-fpm.d/www.conf are uncommented and pointing to the right user/group: ;listen.owner = http ;listen.group = http That fixed it!! Thank you.

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] PHP 7

I'm having trouble with nginx after this update. This is just getting the top level page which is simple php. Any suggestions to get nginx working again - or an update to nginx? php 7.0.1-2 php-fpm 7.0.1-2 nginx - 1.8.0-2 2015/12/31 16:05:01 [crit] 476#0: *5 connect() to

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] PHP 7

On 12/31/2015 05:32 PM, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo wrote: ... not for me :( i have already uncoment that options and no works probably silly to say .. but did you restart the php-fpm service and the webserver?

Re: [arch-general] plasma 5 crashing

On 12/29/2015 09:44 AM, Mike Cloaked wrote: For anyone having this kind of problem some additional useful info might be obtained by running the suggested commands in the page at http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/glxinfo/ - and getting at some ... Sure - graphics is using intel i915 % glxinfo

[arch-general] plasma 5 crashing

Fully updated from testing repo. Since update to plasma 5.5 I am getting periodic crashes of plasmashell -trace back below. Seems to be connected with dri/swrast_dri.so. i915 graphics so not sure why swrast_dri is called - but then again not sure what that does exactly (sounds like software

Re: [arch-general] pacman Conflicts with plasma-framework update

On 12/12/2015 06:21 PM, Genes Lists wrote: ... error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) plasma-framework: ... Fixed by kapptemplate-15.08.3-3 thanks! g

[arch-general] pacman Conflicts with plasma-framework update

... error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) plasma-framework: /usr/share/kdevappwizard/templates/qml-plasmoid.tar.bz2 exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. This file is already owned by: # pacman -oQ

Re: [arch-general] Xorg 1.18.0 enters [testing].

On 11/13/2015 07:44 AM, Laurent Carlier wrote: Xorg 1.18.0 is entering [testing] with the following changes: - You can now choose between xf86-input-evdev and xf86-input-libinput. Might be helpful to add to the announce briefly explaining how one 'can now choose' between them - and to say

[arch-general] sddm crashing with plasma

Anyone else seeing this - started after systemd 226 update. It starts sometimes - most often crashes on warm reboot - cold reboot seems more likely to work. Feels like a threading bug (missing mutex somewhere, or a barrier or something). Symptom: Reboot - sddm won't start. Log:

Re: [arch-general] kservice-5.14.2 broken

This has been patched and works fine now (5.14.2-2) Thank you! gene

[arch-general] kservice-5.14.2 broken

This update breaks plasma - kbuildsycoca5 runs exits and restarts in an infinite loop. Fix is to downgrade to kservice-5.14.0-1 Gene

[arch-general] Kernel NULL pointer and crash - raid bug in 4.1.6 - and fix

I (and others) have enocuntered a pretty nasty raid bug that crashes the machine running current 4.1.x stable. It seems a commit is available but not yet in 4.1.6. (commit 49895bcc7e566ba455eb2996607d6fbd3447ce16) Seems like it is in 4.2 tho. Not sure it's worth patching 4.1.6 with this if

Re: [arch-general] FS mount for google drive

On 06/13/2015 07:46 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: Hi, I was looking for a way to mount google drive as a FS, and found [1] and [2]. Totally unfamiliar with any of these - however since google deprecated[1] OAuth 1.0 (in 2012) in favor of OAuth 2.0 - I'd recommend ensuring any app you choose

Re: [arch-general] systemd 220 crypt swap

On 05/26/2015 05:08 AM, Carsten Mattner wrote: That's not really the same thing, is it? Is the key random (one-time)? Nope it's not the same thing. That's what I meant by 'for comparison' :) ...

Re: [arch-general] systemd 220 crypt swap

On 05/25/2015 11:37 AM, Carsten Mattner wrote: I had to downgrade to systemd 219 because 220 fails to stop or enable luks crypt swap partition. ... /etc/crypttab: cswap /dev/sda3 /dev/urandom swap,cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256,size=256 ... For comparison, I have no issues at all with 220 -

Re: [arch-general] at times when booting system-logind fails and system hangs

On 04/29/2015 05:40 PM, Javier Vasquez wrote: I haven't identified under which circumstances, when booting the system hangs, and the only thing that can be related to that is the message: Failed to start Login Service ... Yes I have seen this but only on one of my computers (laptop, wireless

Re: [arch-general] postfix 3.0.0-3 in testing wont start

Just noticed this. The error complains about this missing file: /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-script the reason is it has the wrong path it should be /usr/lib/postfix/bin/postfix-script So where does postfix need to be fixed to get the correct path in? Thanks.

Re: [arch-general] postfix 3.0.0-3 in testing wont start

On 03/19/2015 07:51 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: [2015-03-19 19:36:35 -0400] Genes Lists: fatal: /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-script: No such file o $ /usr/lib/postfix/bin/postfix-script This script must be run by the postfix command. Do not run directly. Yah sorry i wasn't clear - that is the error

Re: [arch-general] postfix 3.0.0-3 in testing wont start | Solution

On a clean machine which had not been running postfix previously - i installed and started postfix with default configs without error. This suggested something changed in the configs which I missed somehow. Looking in configs it is clear that the variable daemon_directory has changed and

[arch-general] postfix 3.0.0-3 in testing wont start

FYI After updating to this new version - there is an error: fatal: /usr/lib/postfix/postfix-script: No such file o Which is absolutely correct - that file does not exist. Downgrading back to 3.0.0-2 works around the issue. Gene

[arch-general] opendmarc / opendkim - suggestion

opendkim is in community repo. dmarc and dkim are now in broad use by the major internet mail companies (google, yahoo, microsoft, etc). If a maintainer is willing, it would makes sense to move opendmarc from AUR to community as well. For those who may not know, while dkim

[arch-general] filesystem-2015.02 package errors from symlinks

I use symlinks for some directories (e.g. /srv/http and /var/spool/mail are sym links to dedicated disks) When i update the filesystem package I get this error: error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) filesystem: /srv/http exists in filesystem filesystem: /var/spool/mail

Re: [arch-general] filesystem-2015.02 package errors from symlinks [SOLVED]

Answering my own posting. Switching from sym link to bind mount makes everything work. This seems to be the needed behaviour now with pacman 4.2 anyway.

Re: [arch-general] error: key A6234074498E9CEE could not be looked up remotely

On 02/11/2015 10:06 PM, mick wrote: The last few days when I try to update (pacman -Syyu) I get the following:- .. error: key A6234074498E9CEE could not be looked up remotely error: required key missing from keyring error: failed to commit transaction (unexpected error) Errors occurred, no

Re: [arch-general] pacman security when importing new keys?

1 little observation - i had a network blackout (traveling) just as was asking me to ok the import. pacman exited. When i reconnected and tried again - i did not get a Y/n prompt to import - i just get error. The only way I found to proceed with any update after that was to change the key

[arch-general] PAM/crond crashes with glibc 2.21-1

Fully updated from testing repo. Bug filed: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/43738 After this glibc update I am now getting: crond[952]: PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/security/pam_unix.so): /usr/lib/libpthread.so.0: symbol __getrlimit, version GLIBC_PRIVATE not defined in file

Re: [arch-general] PAM/crond crashes with glibc 2.21-1

On 02/08/2015 10:34 AM, Troy Engel wrote: On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Genes Lists li...@sapience.com wrote: As pointed out in the bug report - this may well be goofy-user-error(). I had not rebooted after the glibc update (standard practice). Rebooting now and will report back

[arch-general] strange behaviour after 3.18.6 kernel update

I have one server which does internal mail and nfs - which went weird after about a day on the new kernel. I remote admin via ssh - symptom on the terminal was many commands failed in bad ways. Though 'ls' seemed to be fine. e.g. vi - gave input/output error. journalctl -lf

Re: [arch-general] strange behaviour after 3.18.6 kernel update

Forgot to note - fsck indicated no issues on reboot - I was worried about disk problems on root partition.

[arch-general] NFS server broke after reboot - *urgent* need help

I have a problem where nfs failed. 2 units fail to start rpc-statd.service nfs-server.service. - rpc-statd: systemctl status rpc-statd rpc.statd[736]: Version 1.3.2 starting rpc.statd[736]: Flags: TI-RPC rpc.statd[736]: Running as root. chown

Re: [arch-general] NFS server broke after reboot - *urgent* need help

On 01/31/2015 04:28 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote: On 01/31/2015 10:14 PM, Genes Lists wrote: This was original thread: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-June/036617.html So I tried the same commands - specifically: systemctl restart proc-fs-nfsd.mount systemctl

Re: [arch-general] NFS server broke after reboot - *urgent* need help

On 01/31/2015 05:09 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote: First, in case it's relevant: DON'T PANIC! Ha ha good advice ... :) Secondly, I mentioned journalctl -u, not systemctl. There may be relevant stuff in there that isn't mentioned by systemctl status (due to cutoff). yes I did look thru

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/03/2014 03:08 AM, Armin K. wrote: Yes. Go ahead and file a bug report in arch bug tracker. Existing bug report is here: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/42633 [1] [1] I somehow failed to find this in my search before creating a duplicate -its really obvious so how I missed it I

Re: [arch-general] stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd / php-fpm also failing same way

Other services are also failing with missing /run directories - this is not limited to stunnel it seems. I notice that php-fpm.service is also failing the same way - there may be others. For what it's worth - systemd 217-3 does not fix the issue. I suspect there may be other services

[arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

I posted about stunnel failing after systemd update - then I found that php-fpm has same problem - issue of course only shows up after a boot when /run is re-created. Now I have found that mariadb won't start either - same reason - missing /run/mysqld directory (so cannot create

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/02/2014 08:07 PM, Armin K. wrote: systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup Thanks - here's what I get on machine A (the mysql server): systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup ● systemd-tmpfiles-setup.service - Create Volatile Files and Directories Loaded: loaded

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/02/2014 08:12 PM, Genes Lists wrote: On 11/02/2014 08:07 PM, Armin K. wrote: systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup Thanks - here's what I get on machine A (the mysql server): A couple more machines: This one is mail server: # systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

/start On 11/02/2014 08:15 PM, Genes Lists wrote: On 11/02/2014 08:12 PM, Genes Lists wrote: On 11/02/2014 08:07 PM, Armin K. wrote: systemctl status systemd-tmpfiles-setup Thanks - here's what I get on machine A (the mysql server): A couple more machines: This one is mail server

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/02/2014 08:22 PM, Armin K. wrote: .. Maybe this patch would help? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/tree/0001-units-don-t-order-journal-flushing-afte-remote-fs.ta.patch It fixes a dependency for a service which starts before systemd-tmpfiles-setup as I see. Yah looks

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/02/2014 08:31 PM, Armin K. wrote: This got renamed to nfs-idmapd.service Yeh the new one was started but I had neglected to disable rpc-idmapd. Remove the mentioned files manually from /etc/systemd/system hierarchy and enable the new ones and see if you're lucky. I have

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

On 11/02/2014 08:22 PM, Armin K. wrote: .. Maybe this patch would help? http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/systemd.git/tree/0001-units-don-t-order-journal-flushing-afte-remote-fs.ta.patch It fixes a dependency for a service which starts before systemd-tmpfiles-setup as I see. Yah looks

Re: [arch-general] several missing /run/xxx after systemd update in testing

This seems to be the 'right' commit upstream from Lennart: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=919699ec301ea507edce4a619141ed22e789ac0d

Re: [arch-general] stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd

On 10/30/2014 02:08 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:17:19 -0700 Patrick Burroughs (Celti) celticmad...@gmail.com wrote: ... Shouldn't that rather be handled by a tmpfiles.d snippet, and not in the service file? .. Yes, tmpfiles is the correct way of handling this and there is

Re: [arch-general] stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd

On 10/30/2014 08:27 AM, Christian Hesse wrote: Possibly /var/run is no longer linked to ../run? You should change the path in /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/stunnel.conf from /var/run/stunnel to /run/stunnel. I did check that and /var/run is indeed linked to /run.

Re: [arch-general] stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd

On 10/30/2014 12:04 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: Hi there, tmpfiles.d is not the right approch: There is the RuntimeDirectory keyword for unit files to manage that directory. See http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.exec.html for details. The advantage of this keyword is that

[arch-general] stunnel 5.06-1 vs systemd

I noticed this today after the systemd update and after I rebooted - stunnel package fails to create /run/stunnel and so stunnel.service won't start as it cannot chroot to /var/run/stunnel. stunnel was updated for me on 10/21 from 5.03 to 5.06. Machine has been rebooted since then - so it

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changes to microcode updates

On 10/23/2014 06:34 PM, Jody Allen wrote: ... Is anyone only having one core updated? I get this: dmesg | grep microcode [0.00] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0x29, date = 2013-06-12 [0.344194] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x10, revision=0x29 [0.344203]

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Changes to microcode updates

For info - I have tried to get it working in refind and failed. I added a second initrd line in the boot stanza in refind.conf. But the firmware was not updated. I added to refind sourceforge report[1], perhaps Rod will respond. [1]

[arch-general] testing/ca-certificates-utils problem installing

Packahe testing/ca-certificates-utils seems to have a packaging problem: ... :: Starting full system upgrade... :: Replace ca-certificates-java with testing/ca-certificates-utils? [Y/n] ... (7/7) loading package files [] 100% (7/7) checking for file conflicts

[arch-general] Virtualbox 4.3.16 vs Windows 7 VM crash

My Win 7 VM (64bit on 64bit host) crashes under 4.3.16. It works again after rolling back to 4.3.14. Ifound some noise on the net with others having similar issues (e.g. https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7t=63607) For now I am back to 4.3.14. gene

Re: [arch-general] linux kernel 3.17 and virtualbox

On 09/02/2014 06:29 PM, Genes Lists wrote: Quick heads up - virtualbox needs couple fixes which are not yet in upstream 4.3.14 in order to compile against 3.17. Good news - The fixes are in 4.3.16 Bad news - Win 7 VM crashes under 4.3.16 ... (see my other post) gene

[arch-general] linux kernel 3.17 and virtualbox

Quick heads up - virtualbox needs couple fixes which are not yet in upstream 4.3.14 in order to compile against 3.17. There are patches here: https://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?p=296650#p296650 The patch file I used was : virtualbox-alloc_netdev.diff.txt I have tested the module

Re: [arch-general] systemd 215 + filesystem 2014.07-1 = problems booting? [RESOLVED]

systemd 215-2 is now in testing; this now ensures the /etc/os-release link is present. Best I can tell either having the link or rebuilding initramfs resolves the issue.

[arch-general] systemd 215 + filesystem 2014.07-1 = problems booting?

Anyone else having trouble booting with testing repo and systemd 215 + filesystem 2014.07-1 as per thie forum post? https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=183796

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

More problems - could really use some help on this one. Rebooted the server today after full update (testing) - now ALL nfs clients get Input/Output error on any symbolic link - regular files are fine. Server/client both: nfs-utils 1.3.0-2 rpcbind 0.2.1-5 On any client (this is an

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

One more piece of info: If on the client - I create a new symbolic link - it is fine on both client and server. On Client: # ln -s testing.db.tar.gz JUNK # ls -l JUNK 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Jun 28 20:24 JUNK - testing.db.tar.gz Same back on the NFS server ... #

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

Rebooted server a second time (prev clients were rebooted first) - and now all clients are happy. Odd no?

Re: [arch-general] systemd 214, journal problem

I had same issue with systemd 214 and kernel 3.15. For me,it was resolved with 3.15.1 kernel (which had some capabilities and audit fixes - not sure they were cause, but 3.15.1 fixed it for me). If you're running 3.15.1 or 3.15.rc2 and still have the issue then it is likely not same issue

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

On 06/18/2014 09:17 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: After running this update - my nfs server won't run at all - I get this error: systemctl status nfs-server ● nfs-server.service - NFS server and services Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/nfs-server.service; enabled) Active: failed

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

On 06/20/2014 04:16 PM, Genes Lists wrote: ... ..rpc.nfsd[872]: rpc.nfsd: writing fd to kernel failed: errno 11(...ed) More strangeness - after a while I tried loading all the pieces by hand - and suprisingly that worked. Then after that, the systemd nfs-server service works if re-started

[arch-general] [arch-dev-public] nfs-utils-1.3.0 enters [testing]

This is probably unlikely but I'll ask. Is it possible that something that nfs needed (but missing from systemd service file) had not actually come up yet but several minutes later it was up and then nfs was able to start? Thought I'd ask. gene/

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [Draft] MariaDB 10.0 enters [extra]

Still having same problem fully updated on testing repo: postmap: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.18: no version information available (required by postmap) Any suggestions to fix?

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [Draft] MariaDB 10.0 enters [extra]

On 05/17/2014 08:40 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: Hi guys, New MariaDB is sitting in [testing] for a while now. It's temporarily This does trigger this warning in postfix's postmap program: postmap: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.18: no version information available (required by postmap)

[arch-general] KDE update and baloo

After the update to 4.13 - i have baloo sucking up cpu cylces. I did go to the desktop search and add every single file system/directory to the 'dont scan' list. So there should be nothing left to scan. Didn't help - it's still running 2 hours later ... anyone know how to stop this selfish

Re: [arch-general] KDE update and baloo

On 04/17/2014 10:37 AM, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: Is it with KDE PIM? I remember a discussion in the release ML that baloo was somewhat broken in PIM. I dunno if that was fixed or not. No not using PIM. I killed off all the baloo processes - short term fix.There really should be an off button on

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Linux 3.14 in [testing]

On 04/03/2014 04:10 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 03.04.2014 05:24, schrieb Evangelos Foutras: ... Has anyone else experienced hangs in Firefox with the latest kernel? None that I can remember. I use firefox only lightly - however I too have not noticed any problems with 3.14 from rc1

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Linux 3.14 in [testing]

On 04/01/2014 06:44 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Okay, pushed everything to [testing] and [community-testing]. This may just be a mirror sync issue but I am seeing this: pacman -Syu ... looking for inter-conflicts... error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies) ::

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Linux 3.14 in [testing]

On 04/01/2014 08:51 PM, Genes Lists wrote: ... looking for inter-conflicts... Next 2 machines I updated from testing worked fine - neither has bumblebee - but they both have virtualbox ... scratching head ...

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] Trimming down our default kernel configuration

On 03/28/2014 09:12 AM, Daniel Micay wrote: ... Security needs to be simple, predictable and well understood. It needs to be provably correct and easily audited. SELinux is none of these things. I don't really understand why a distribution striving for simplicity would ever enable it. I

Re: [arch-general] Incremental update for TeXLive 2013

On 03/12/2014 05:23 PM, Rémy Oudompheng wrote: Hello, I am going to push updated TeXLive packages to [extra]. Thank you! I also posted this to forum: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1391778#p1391778 I got this error on update: texlive: recreating all formats... luatex:

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [kde-unstable] 4.13

Thanks for putting this up - much appreciated. Testing this now - I didn't see any significant visual changes and don't see much behavioural diffs either other than desktop search. However I had nepomuk turned off (I have zero need or interest in any global search) - for the life of me

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

On 02/20/2014 11:33 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: Hi all, I'm working on packaging the systemd 209 release, and I expect to have Good news. My problems ith 209 resolved after updating to 210. thank you!

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

On 02/21/2014 04:24 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 20.02.2014 17:33, schrieb Dave Reisner: Hi all, I'm working on packaging the systemd 209 release, and I expect to have pkgrel=1 into [testing] in a few hours, barring any unforseen problems. It's a huge release (nearly 2000 commits since 208),

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

On 02/21/2014 11:30 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: HandleLidSwitch=suspend LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no This means that logind will initiate a suspend on LID closed *except* when something inhibits it - for example, KDE inhibits logind from suspending. Thanks I meant to put

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

On 02/21/2014 11:40 AM, Genes Lists wrote: On 02/21/2014 11:30 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: HandleLidSwitch=suspend LidSwitchIgnoreInhibited=no This means that logind will initiate a suspend on LID closed *except* when something inhibits it - for example, KDE inhibits logind from suspending

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

To be sure I rebopted - and still have same problem - no suspend on lid close - logs just say lid close / lid open as before. so the event is recognized but no suspend. Anything else I can try short of going back to systemd 208?

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] systemd 209 in [testing]

One final piece of info - with systemd 209 the KDE menu under 'leave' is missing sleep/hibernate buttons. Putting back 208, the buttons come back.

[arch-general] Thank you

Over the last 2 weeks I have replaced 3 fedora servers with Arch - and want to say thank you . That's the last of my fedora machines now and I am all Arch and they are all working really well. The new boxes are haswell UEFI and boot using refind. Setting this up was straightforward with

Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [HEADSUP] Arch boot splash

On 12/22/2013 03:22 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: Am 22.12.2013 03:11, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: Anyways, I am planning to replace gummiboot by syslinux in archiso. (but ... Given the state of syslinux on EFI (fails to load some kernels entirely for some people) and its lack of features

[arch-general] virtualbox CPU issue / upstream has fix

I am seeing the same problem as reported (and fixed in 4.3.3 [1] ) of 100% CPU with Virtualbox 4.3.2. Any chance of getting the fix in the arch testing repo? [1] https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/12300 Thanks gene

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra]

On 10/12/2013 11:58 PM, Genes Lists wrote: On 10/12/2013 11:43 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: You did, of course, file bug reports for all those issues, so that they will be fixed in the upcoming release. Yep: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325945 Yesterday all passwords were

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra]

On 10/17/2013 08:14 AM, Genes Lists wrote: Yesterday all passwords were deleted or no longer visible/used by the applet. I can still see previous passphrases in the directory: ~/.kde4/share/apps/networkmanagement/secrets Since nothing in that dir is recently dated I would assume

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra]

Unfortunately, upstream say this will happen for anyone not using kwallet (like me) as files are no longer supported - its kwallet only now. gene

[arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra]

Sorry hit reply and forgot to change to arch-general - resending as I am not permissioned on arch-dev-public. Original Message Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra] Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:43:20 -0400 From: Genes Lists li...@sapience.com

Re: [arch-general] Fwd: Re: [arch-dev-public] Plasma-NM plasmoid moved to [extra]

On 10/12/2013 11:43 PM, Gaetan Bisson wrote: You did, of course, file bug reports for all those issues, so that they will be fixed in the upcoming release. Yep: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=325945

Re: [arch-general] kernel 3.11 and virtualbox kernel module

On 09/03/2013 01:50 AM, Tobias Powalowski wrote: ... Please send a link to the patch. greetings tpowa Sure not problem - I just made this patch of what I used: http://www.sapience.com/bugs/vboxsf-fix-3.11.patch This is to patch /usr/src/vboxguest-4.2.16/vboxsf/dirops.c Gene

Re: [arch-general] kernel 3.11 and virtualbox kernel module

Forgot to give the upstream link: https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/47588/vbox/trunk/src/VBox/Additions/linux/sharedfolders/dirops.c

Re: [arch-general] kernel 3.11 and virtualbox kernel module

This may be relevant too but i did not experience a problem that I was aware of. https://www.virtualbox.org/changeset/47484/vbox

[arch-general] kernel 3.11 and virtualbox kernel module

Heads up - noew that 3.11 is out, there is a patch in upstream virtualbox which is not in vbox 4.2.16 that is necessary otherwise the kernel modules wont compile for 3.11 kernel. The file needing fixing is /usr/src/vboxguest-4.2.16/vboxsf/dirops.c I am happy to send the required patch

<    1   2   3   >